XXX. EUBULIDES 1. Philod. rhet. I p. 84, 31 sq.:鈥 蟿峤 未峤 未峤 渭峤 [魏伪蟿始] 峒怺蟺喂蟽蟿萎渭畏谓 蟺蔚蟻伪委[谓蔚蟽胃伪委] 蟿[喂谓伪]蟼 蟿峥段 峥ノ废勎肯佄刮横慷谓 位蠈纬蠅谓 [峒位位始 峒愇枷蔚喂蟻委]峋 魏伪峤 蟽蟿慰蠂伪蟽渭峥 [蟺峥断俔 未蔚峥 蟺维位喂谓 位伪尾蔚峥栁; 慰[峤 纬]峤跋 伪峤愊勏 纬蔚 蟿慰峥ο勎 未[萎蟺慰蠀 谓慰]蔚峥栁 未蔚峥 蟽畏渭伪委谓蔚蟽胃伪喂 魏伪蟿峤 蟿峤次 位苇尉喂谓 蟿伪蠉蟿畏谓, 蟿峤 渭峤 蟽蠀位位慰纬喂蟽渭慰峤合 未喂伪位蔚魏蟿喂魏慰峤合 峒斚囄滴刮 伪峤愊勎肯嵪. 慰峤 纬峤跋 蟿喂谓峤蚕 蟿慰峥蟿慰 蟺蔚蟺]蠈谓胃伪蟽喂谓 峒位[位]峤 [蟺维谓]蟿蔚蟼, 蠂蠅蟻峤断 蟿慰峥 峒[蟺伪喂未蔚蠉]蟿峥 蟽蠀谓伪蟻苇蟽魏蔚喂谓 蟿慰峥ο勎 位委伪谓. [螘峤怾尾慰蠀位委未峥 纬慰峥ξ 峒愇澄何蔽籟蔚峥 蟺]慰蠀 魏伪蟿伪蠁蟻慰谓慰峥ξ絒蟿喂] 蟿峥段 [渭]峤 蟽蠀位位慰纬喂蟽渭慰峤篬蟼] 峒愊囅屛较勏壩 位蠈纬蠅谓路 [渭]伪谓胃维[谓]蔚喂谓 纬峤癧蟻] {蟿慰蠉蟿蠅谓} 魏伪峤 峒勎轿迪 蟿慰[蠉蟿蠅]谓 峒∥坚径蟼 蟿峤 蟺蟻维纬渭伪蟿维 [蠁畏蟽喂]谓. 1 -尾慰蠉位喂未喂 Eubulidem dialecticum, Demosthenis, ut aiunt, magistrum (sic etiam Philod. II 206, 9), Aristotelis detrectatorem (Natorp, RE VI 870), de oratoris opere praecepta edidisse ex Philodemi verbis apparet. Diog. Laert. II 10 (4), 108: 蟿峥喯 未始 E峤愇何晃滴次肯 未喂伪未慰蠂峥喯 峒愊兿勎 魏伪峤 螘峤愇肝肯呂晃次废 峤 螠喂位萎蟽喂慰蟼, 峤兿 魏伪峤 蟺慰位位慰峤合 峒愇 未喂伪位蔚魏蟿喂魏峥 位蠈纬慰蠀蟼 峒犗佅勎废兾, 蟿蠈谓 蟿蔚 蠄蔚蠀未蠈渭蔚谓慰谓 魏伪峤 蟿峤肝 未喂伪位伪谓胃维谓慰谓蟿伪 魏伪峤 峒ㄎ晃合勏佄蔽 魏伪峤 峒愇澄何滴何蔽幌呂嘉嘉轿课 魏伪峤 蟽蠅蟻委蟿畏谓 魏伪峤 魏蔚蟻伪蟿委谓畏谓 魏伪峤 蠁伪位伪魏蟻蠈谓. 蟺蔚蟻峤 蟿慰蠉蟿慰蠀 蠁畏蟽委 蟿喂蟼 蟿峥段 魏蠅渭喂魏峥段 (Mein. IV 618, 51)路 慰峤懴佄瓜兿勎刮横礁蟼 未始 E峤愇参肯呂晃次废 魏蔚蟻伪蟿委谓伪蟼 峒愊佅壪勧慷谓 魏伪峤 蠄蔚蠀未伪位维味慰蟽喂谓 位蠈纬慰喂蟼 蟿慰峤合 峥ノ勎肯佄毕 魏蠀位委蠅谓 峒蟺峥單晃甘 峒斚囅壩 螖畏渭慰蟽胃苇谓慰蠀蟼 蟿峤次 峥ハ壪慰蟽蟿蠅渭蠀位萎胃蟻伪谓. 峒愥看魏蔚喂 纬峤跋 伪峤愊勎酷喀 魏伪峤 螖畏渭慰蟽胃苇谓畏蟼 峒魏畏魏慰苇谓伪喂 魏伪峤 峥ハ壪喂魏蠋蟿蔚蟻慰蟼 峤⑽ 蟺伪蠉蟽伪蟽胃伪喂. 峤 未峤 E峤愇参肯呂晃次废 魏伪峤 蟺蟻峤赶 峒埾佄瓜兿勎肯勎晃肺 未喂蔚蠁苇蟻蔚蟿慰 魏伪峤 蟺慰位位峤 伪峤愊勧礁谓 未喂伪尾苇尾位畏魏蔚 (cf. Euseb. Praep. ev. 15, 2. Athen. 354 c. Themist. XXIII p. 285 c).
|
XXX. Eubulides 1. Philodemus, On Rhetoric: How are we to interpret the claim that some rhetorical speeches are completed not through knowledge but by experience and intuition? We should not, at any rate, think that this way of putting it signifies the lack of dialectical syllogisms, since the latter is common to all speeches, not just a few, independently of the fact that this situation is especially liked by the uneducated. So he berates Eubulides for despising discourse that lacks syllogisms, for, he says, we understand matters just as well without them. It is clear from Philodemus鈥 words that the dialectician Eubulides, said to be Demosthenes鈥 teacher (so also Philod. 2.206.9) and a disparager of Aristotle (Natorp, RE VI 870), published teachings on the orator鈥檚 craft. Diog. Laert. 2.10 (4), 108: 鈥極ne of Euclides鈥 successors is Eubulides of Miletus, who interrogated many kinds of speech in dialectic, the lying one, the fallacious one, Electra, the wrapped-in one, the Sorites, the fallacy of the Horns, the bald one. One of the comedians writes the following (Mein. 4.618.51
The eristic sophist Eubulides, interrogating Horns, Rolling along the rhetors with with false and lazy speeches, Ran away with Demosthenes鈥 petty trick-heavy wordiness. It is likely that Demosthenes too listened to him and stopped dealing in petty trickery. Eubulides also had his differences with Aristotle and slandered him a great deal鈥 (cf. Euseb. Praep. ev. 15.2; Athen. 354 c; Themist. 23 p. 285 c). |