大象传媒

XXIV. ISOCRATES

1. Di慰nys. Hal. de Isocr. p. 55, 10 Us.-R.: 蟺蔚蠁蠀蟻渭苇谓畏谓 蟿蔚 蟺伪蟻伪位伪尾峤嘉� 蟿峤次� 峒勏兾何废兾刮� 蟿峥段� 位蠈纬蠅谓 峤懴�峤� 蟿峥段� 蟺蔚蟻峤� 螕慰蟻纬委伪谓 魏伪峤� 螤蟻蠅蟿伪纬蠈蟻伪谓 蟽慰蠁喂蟽蟿峥段� 蟺蟻峥断勎肯� 峒愊囅幭佄废兾滴� 峒�蟺峤� 蟿峥段� 峒愊佄瓜兿勎刮横慷谓 蟿蔚 魏伪峤� 蠁蠀蟽喂魏峥段� 峒愊�峤� 蟿慰峤合� 蟺慰位喂蟿喂魏慰峤合� 魏伪峤� 蟺蔚蟻峤� 伪峤愊勧酱谓 蟽蟺慰蠀未维味蠅谓 蟿峤次� 峒愊�喂蟽蟿萎渭畏谓 未喂蔚蟿苇位蔚蟽蔚谓, 峒愇� 峒�蟼, 峤ハ� 蠁畏蟽喂谓 伪峤愊勏屜�, 蟿峤� 尾慰蠀位蔚蠉蔚蟽胃伪喂 魏伪峤� 位苇纬蔚喂谓 魏伪峤� 蟺蟻维蟿蟿蔚喂谓 蟿峤� 蟽蠀渭蠁苇蟻慰谓蟿伪 蟺伪蟻伪纬委谓蔚蟿伪喂 蟿慰峥栂� 渭伪胃慰峥ο兾刮�.

Cf. Isocr. ep. 5, 4, 慰r. 15, 175. 255. 276.

2. [Plut.] vitae 围 orr. 837 b: 峤∥嘉�位蔚喂 未峤� 蟿慰峥栂� 尾慰蠀位慰渭苇谓慰喂蟼, 蠂蠅蟻委蟽伪蟼 蟺蟻峥断勎肯� 蟿慰峤合� 峒愊佄瓜兿勎刮何酷胶蟼 位蠈纬慰蠀蟼 蟿峥段� 蟺慰位喂蟿喂魏峥段�, 蟺蔚蟻峤� 慰峤撓� 峒愊兿�慰蠉未伪蟽蔚.

3. Philod. rhet. II 122, 11 S.: 峤� 未蔚 峒赶兾课合佄�蟿畏[蟼 魏伪峤禲 蟿苇蠂谓伪蟼 魏伪蟿伪位[喂蟺蠈渭蔚]谓[慰蟼] 峒勎晃晃课� 蟿蔚 蟺慰位[位慰峤� 蟽慰蠁]喂蟽蟿伪峤� [胃伪]蠀渭伪蟽蟿峤碵谓 伪峤愊刔峤次� 蔚峒段轿蔽� 蟿[苇蠂]谓畏谓 [峒�蟺慰蠁伪]委谓慰谓蟿伪喂.

Cf. Di慰nys. Hal. ad Ammaeum p. 259, 2 Us.-R. (supra XXII 3).

4. Quint. inst. 3, 1, 14: postmeridianis scholis Aristoteles praecipere artem oratoriam coepit, noto quidem illo, ut traditur, versu ex Philocteta frequenter usus: turpe esse tacere et Is慰craten pati dicere. ars est utriusque.

5. Plut. Demosthenes c. 5, 7: 螝蟿畏蟽喂尾委慰蠀 未峤� 渭苇渭谓畏蟿伪喂 (scil. Hermippus) 位苇纬慰谓蟿慰蟼 蟺伪蟻峤� 螝伪位位委慰蠀 蟿慰峥� 危蠀蟻伪魏慰蠀蟽委慰蠀 魏伪委 蟿喂谓蠅谓 峒勎晃幌壩� 蟿峤跋� 峒赶兾课合佄�蟿慰蠀蟼 蟿苇蠂谓伪蟼 魏伪峤� 蟿峤跋� 峒埼晃何刮次�渭伪谓蟿慰蟼 魏蟻蠉蠁伪 位伪尾蠈谓蟿伪 蟿峤肝� 螖畏渭慰蟽胃苇谓畏谓 魏伪蟿伪渭伪胃蔚峥栁�.

Huic fabulae nihil subesse potest nisi quod 蟿峥段� 峒愊兿壪勎迪佄刮横慷谓 未喂未伪纬渭维蟿蠅谓 Isocratis artem fuisse creditum est. 位蠈纬蠅谓 蟿苇蠂谓伪蟼 峒愊�伪纬纬苇位位蔚蟽胃伪喂 Alcidamas 螜socratis esse dicit 蟺蔚蟻峤� 蟽慰蠁喂蟽蟿峥段� 15, quod ad scriptam artem non pertinet. Vide seq.

6. Diog. Laert. IV 1, 2: 魏伪峤� 蟺蟻峥断勎肯� (scil. Speusippus) 蟺伪蟻峤� 峒赶兾课合佄�蟿慰蠀蟼 蟿峤� 魏伪位慰蠉渭蔚谓伪 峒�蟺蠈蟻蟻畏蟿伪 峒愇疚�谓蔚纬魏蔚谓, 峤ハ� 蠁畏蟽喂 螝伪喂谓蔚蠉蟼.

7. Cic. inv. 2, 2, 7: nam fuit tempore eodem, quo Arist慰teles, magnus et nobilis rhetor Isocrates. cuius ipsius quam constet esse artem, non invenimus, discipulorum autem atque eorum, qui protinus ab hac sunt disciplina profecti, multa de arte praecepta reperimus.

Cf. A V 9 sq. Philod. rhet. I 147 Col. II S.: (谓慰渭委味慰蠀蟽喂) 渭畏未始 峒勎� 蟺慰蠀 魏伪峤� 蠁喂位慰蟽慰蠁委伪谓 蟿峤次� 峒懳毕呄勧慷谓 未[蠉谓伪渭喂谓 魏]伪峤� 蟿苇蠂谓畏谓 [蔚峒段轿蔽�. 蔚]峒� 未始 峒愇参酷交位慰谓蟿慰 [渭峤参� 蟿苇]蠂谓[畏谓 蔚峒段轿蔽�,] 蟿峤次� 未始 伪峤愊勧酱谓 [慰峤栂兾盷谓 峒� 渭蠈谓畏谓 峒� 渭维位喂蟽蟿始 峒愇� 蠂蟻萎蟽[蔚喂, 蟽蠀谓]蠅谓蠉渭蠅蟼 蟿峥� 蟿[峥段� 峒赶兾课篯蟻伪蟿喂魏峥段� 魏伪峤� 蟿峥禰谓 峤佄嘉课痌蠅谓 峒愇何�位慰蠀谓. 峒赶兾课合佄�蟿蔚喂慰喂 vel 慰峒� 峒�蟺始 峒赶兾课合佄�蟿慰蠀蟼 alibi audiunt. Ad rem inlustrandam utile est, quod apud Philod. rhet. II 252, 28 nominantur oratores [蟽蠀谓蟿维尉蔚喂蟼 慰峤怾魏 峒斚囄课较刐蔚蟼 峒�蟺峤� 蟿峥段� 未喂未伪蟽]魏伪位蔚委蠅谓 [蠁蔚蟻慰渭]苇谓伪蟼 魏伪峤� 蟺伪[蟻伪未喂未慰渭苇谓]伪蟼, si fides est supplementis.

8. Cic. Att. 2, 1, 1: quamquam tua illa 鈥� legi enim libenter 鈥� horridula mihi atque incompta visa sunt, sed tamen erant ornata hoc ipso, quod ornamenta neglexerant, et, ut mulieres ideo bene olere, quia nihil olebant, videbantur. meus autem liber totum Isocrati 渭蠀蟻慰胃萎魏喂慰谓 atque omnes eius discipulorum arculas ac non nihil etiam Aristotelia pigmenta consumpsit (scil. commentarius consulatus).

9. [Plut.] Vitae X orr., Isocr. 838 e/f: 蔚峒跋冡蕉 未始 慰峒� 魏伪峤� 蟿苇蠂谓伪蟼 伪峤愊勧礁谓 位苇纬慰蠀蟽喂 蟽蠀纬纬蔚纬蟻伪蠁苇谓伪喂, 慰峒� 未始 慰峤� 渭蔚胃蠈未峥� 峒�位位始 峒�蟽魏萎蟽蔚喂 蠂蟻萎蟽伪蟽胃伪喂.

10. Photius Bibl. p. 486 b 7 Bkk.: 纬蔚纬蟻伪蠁苇谓伪喂 未峤� 伪峤愊勧礁谓 魏伪峤� 蟿苇蠂谓畏谓 峥ノ废勎肯佄刮横酱谓 位苇纬慰蠀蟽喂谓, 峒Ｎ� 魏伪峤� 峒∥嘉滇繓蟼 峒聪兾嘉滴� 蟿慰峥� 峒�谓未蟻峤赶� 峒愊�喂纬蟻伪蠁慰渭苇谓畏谓 蟿峥� 峤�谓蠈渭伪蟿喂. 慰峒� 未峤� 蟽蠀谓伪蟽魏萎蟽蔚喂 渭峋段晃晃课� 峒� 蟿苇蠂谓峥� 蠂蟻萎蟽伪蟽胃伪喂 魏伪蟿峤� 蟿慰峤合� 位蠈纬慰蠀蟼 蟿峤肝� 峒勎轿聪佄� 蠁伪蟽委.

11. Vita Isocr. XII (Or. Att. II 5a 37, Rose, Aristotelis fr. 141): 位苇纬蔚蟿伪喂 未峤� 峤∠� 峤呄勎� 魏伪峤� 蟿苇蠂谓畏谓 峥ノ废勎肯佄刮横酱谓 峒斘诚佄毕埼�, 蟿峥� 未峤� 蠂蟻蠈谓峥� 峒斚勏呄囄滴� 伪峤愊勧酱谓 峒�蟺慰位苇蟽胃伪喂. 峒愊佄滇繓 未苇 蟿喂蟼路 魏伪峤� 蟺蠈胃蔚谓 未峥單晃课�, 峤呄勎� 蟿慰峥ο勎� 慰峤曄勏壪� 峒斚囄滴�; 位苇纬慰渭蔚谓 峤∠� 峤呄勎� 峒埾佄瓜兿勎肯勎�位畏蟼 峤� 蠁喂位蠈蟽慰蠁慰蟼 蟽蠀谓伪纬伪纬峤嘉� 蟿苇蠂谓伪蟼 峥ノ废勎肯佄刮横桨蟼 峒愇嘉轿�蟽胃畏 魏伪峤� 蟿伪蠉蟿畏蟼.

12. Excerpta Corporis P, W II p. 683, 19 = P.S. p.60, 4 R.: 螕慰蟻纬委伪蟼... 魏伪峤� 峒赶兾课合佄�蟿畏蟼 峒斘诚佄毕埼蔽� 蟿苇蠂谓畏谓 (蟿苇蠂谓伪蟼 emend. Rabe).

13. Sopater in Hermog. W V p. 7, 12: 渭蔚蟿始 伪峤愊勧礁谓 峒埼较勎瓜嗎慷谓 峤� 峥�伪渭谓慰蠉蟽喂慰蟼 峤� 螛慰蠀魏蠀未委未慰蠀 未喂未维蟽魏伪位慰蟼 位苇纬蔚蟿伪喂 蟿苇蠂谓畏谓 纬蟻维蠄伪喂, 渭蔚蟿峤� 蟿伪峥ο勎� 未峤� 峒赶兾课合佄�蟿畏蟼 峤� 峥ノ�蟿蠅蟻. 魏伪峤� 蟺峋断兾蔽� 渭峤参� 伪峤椣勎蔽� 未畏渭伪纬蠅纬喂魏伪峤� 蟿苇蠂谓伪喂 蔚峒跋兾�谓.

De Sopatr慰 v. supra p. 76.

14. Cic. Brut. 12, 48: Isocratem primo artem dicendi esse negavisse (ait Aristoteles), scribere autem aliis solitum orations鈥� sed cum鈥� saepe ipse in iudicium vocaretur, orations aliis destitisse scribere totumque se ad artes componendas transtulisse.

Vide plena verba supra A V 9. Artes, Graece 蟿苇蠂谓伪喂, hic orationes esse ad regulam expolitae videntur.

15. Epistolae Socraticorum (Speusippi) XXX 4 (峒赶兾课合佄�蟿畏谓) 蟿峤肝� 峒愇� 蟿伪峥栂� 蟿苇蠂谓伪喂蟼 峒�蟺慰蠁伪喂谓蠈渭蔚谓慰谓 峒愇� 蟿峥喯� 席峒勏兾刮� 蟺蟻蠈纬慰谓慰谓 峒� 蟿慰峤合� 蔚峤斘轿肯呄� 未蔚峥栁� 蟺蟻慰蟽蔚峥栁轿蔽� 蟿慰峤合� 峒�魏蟻慰伪蟿维蟼.

Fort. 峒愇� 蟿峥喯� <蔚峤愇晃课澄�>伪蟼 蟿峥段� 蟺蟻慰纬蠈谓蠅谓 蔚峤斘轿肯呄� 未蔚峥栁� 蟺慰蔚峥栁� 蟿慰峤合� 峒�魏蟻慰伪蟿维蟼 deleta ante 蔚峤斘轿肯呄� dittographia 峒� 蟿慰峤合�. Ceterum ad Is. 5, 77 verba referunt.

16. Ibid. XXX 10: 魏伪委 蠁畏蟽喂 渭峤参� 峒愇� 蟿伪峥栂� 蟿苇蠂谓伪喂蟼 蟺蟻慰蟽萎魏蔚喂谓 慰峒拔何滇繓伪 魏伪峤� 纬谓蠋蟻喂渭伪 蟿峤� 蟺伪蟻伪未蔚委纬渭伪蟿伪 蠁苇蟻蔚喂谓, 峤�位喂纬蠅蟻萎蟽伪蟼 未峤� 蟿峥喯� 蟿苇蠂谓畏蟼 峒�位位慰蟿蟻委慰喂蟼 魏伪峤� 蟿慰峥栂� 伪峒跋兿囄�蟽蟿慰喂蟼 魏伪峤� 蟿慰峥栂� 蟺蟻峤赶� 蟿峤肝� 位蠈纬慰谓 峤∠� 峒愇轿蔽较勎瓜壪勎�蟿慰喂蟼 蟺伪蟻伪未蔚委纬渭伪蟽喂 蠂蟻峥喯勎蔽�.

Haec pertinere videntur ad Euagorae 12 sq. et 77, unde tales orationes 蟿苇蠂谓伪蟼 esse dictas sequitur. Artem ab Isocrate scriptam esse vix demonstrant.

17. [Plut.] Vitae X 慰rr. 837a de Isocrate: 魏伪峤� 峒愇何滴�谓慰蠀 (Theramenis) 蟿喂谓峤跋� 慰峤斚兾毕� 蟿苇蠂谓伪蟼 伪峤愊勧糠 蠁伪蟽喂 蟽蠀渭蟺蟻伪纬渭伪蟿蔚蠉蟽伪蟽胃伪喂鈥� 伪峒� 蔚峒跋兾刮� 峒愊�喂纬蔚纬蟻伪渭渭苇谓伪喂 螔蠈蟿蠅谓慰蟼.

18. Quint. inst. 2, 15, 4 (Sheehan 1): haec opinio (rhet慰ricen esse 未蠉谓伪渭喂谓) originem ab 螜socrate, si tamen re vera ars quae circumfertur eius est, duxit, qui, cum longe sit a voluntate infamantium oratoris officia, finem artis temere comprendit dicens esse rhetoricen persuadendi opificem, id est 蟺蔚喂胃慰峥ο� 未畏渭喂慰蠀蟻纬蠈谓.

Ibid. 33: 鈥渜uidam etiam philosophiae (partem rhetoricen vocant), quorum est Isocrates.鈥� Haec ex orationibus conclusio facile duci potuit. Ad 蟺蔚喂胃慰峥ο� 未畏渭喂慰蠀蟻纬蠈谓 Antid. 249, 275, 276 sq., confert alia Sheehan p. 12, plurima Pantatzes I p. 23 sq.

19. Sextus Emp. adv. math. II 62: 峒赶兾课合佄�蟿畏蟼 蠁畏蟽峤� 渭畏未峤参� 峒勎晃晃� 峒愊�喂蟿畏未蔚蠉蔚喂谓 蟿慰峤合� 峥ノ�蟿慰蟻伪蟼 峒� 峒愊�喂蟽蟿萎渭畏谓 蟺蔚喂胃慰峥ο�.

Thiele, Herm. 27, 12.

20. Philod. (pugnans. cum rhetoricis sophistis) rhet. I 212, 19 S.: 谓峥ξ� 未峤� 魏峒�魏蔚峥栁轿� 未喂伪位畏蟺蟿苇慰谓 伪峤愊勧慷谓, 峤呄勎� 蟿峥段� 渭峤参� 蟺蟻慰尾位畏渭维蟿蠅谓 蟿峤� 渭峤参� 峒愊兿勧蕉谓 未喂魏伪谓喂魏维, 蟿峤� 未峤� 蟽蠀渭尾慰蠀位蔚蠀蟿喂魏维, 蟿峤� 未峤� 蟺蔚蟻峤� 蟿慰峤合� 峒愊�伪委谓慰蠀蟼 魏伪峤� 蠄蠈纬慰蠀蟼, 峤�谓 蟿峤� 渭峤参� 蟽蠀谓苇蠂蔚喂谓 峒斚單毕兾蔽� 蟿峤跋� 蟺蟻峤赶� 峒�位位萎位慰蠀蟼 峒愊�喂蟺位慰魏维蟼, 蟿峤� 未始 峤懴�慰纬蟻维蠁蔚喂谓 蟿峤� 蟽蠀渭蠁苇蟻慰谓蟿伪 蟺峋断兾刮�, 蟿峤� 未始 峒愊�峤� 蟿峤跋� 峒�蟻蔚蟿峤跋� 蟺蟻慰蟿蟻苇蟺蔚喂谓 魏伪峤� 蟿峥段� 魏伪魏喂峥段� 峒�蟺伪位位维蟿蟿蔚喂谓.

Isocratis 蟺慰位喂蟿喂魏峤次� 蠁喂位慰蟽慰蠁委伪谓 spectare videntur, v. e. g. 2, 8. 3, 1 sq. 5, 17. 8, 39. 9, 5. 12, 246. 271. 15, 255.

21. Ioannes Sardianus in Aphthonii Prog. p. 126, 19 R. (de encomio. Sh. 9): 蟿峤肝� 位苇纬慰谓蟿伪 未蔚峥� 魏伪蟿峤� 蟿峤肝� 峒赶兾课合佄�蟿畏谓 渭伪谓胃维谓蔚喂谓 渭峤参� 蟿峤跋� 未喂伪喂蟻苇蟽蔚喂蟼, 魏蟻喂蟿峤次� 未峤� 蔚峒段轿蔽� 蟿峥喯� 蠂蟻萎蟽蔚蠅蟼 魏伪峤� 蟽蠀渭尾伪委谓慰谓蟿伪蟼 魏伪喂蟻慰峥栂� 魏伪峤� 蟺蟻慰蟽蠋蟺慰喂蟼 魏伪峤� 蟺蟻维纬渭伪蟽喂 蟺慰喂蔚峥栂兾肝蔽� 蟿慰峤合� 位蠈纬慰蠀蟼.

Eadem habent Scholia in Aphth. Parisina (ex Nicolai Sophistae Prog. cf. Rhet. gr. XI ed. Felten p. 58) W II 632, 25 sq. (3 蟿峥喯� 魏蟻委蟽蔚蠅蟼 Scholia W, 4 魏伪峤� 魏伪喂蟻慰峥栂� Nic.)

22. Syrianus in Herm慰g. I, p. 28, 6 R. (cf. 30, 14. 32, 1. 67, 10) et Maximus Planudes in Hermog. W V, p. 469, 6 (Sh. 7): 峒愇� 蟿峥喯� 峒赶兾课合佄�蟿慰蠀蟼 蟿苇蠂谓畏蟼 未喂未伪蟽魏蠈渭蔚胃伪, 蟺慰峥栁蔽� 蟿峥段� 位苇尉蔚蠅谓 位苇纬慰谓蟿伪喂 魏伪胃伪蟻伪委螄 蟿慰蟽慰峥ο勎课� 纬峤跋� 蟺蔚蠁蟻蠈谓蟿喂魏蔚 蟿峥喯� 魏伪胃伪蟻蠈蟿畏蟿慰蟼 峤� 峒�谓萎蟻, 峤∠� 5 魏伪峤� 峒愇� 蟿峥� 慰峒拔何滴�峋� 蟿苇蠂谓峥� 蟿慰喂维未蔚 蟺伪蟻伪纬纬苇位位蔚喂谓 蟺蔚蟻峤� 位苇尉蔚蠅蟼路 未蔚峥� 未峤� 蟿峥� 渭峤参� 位苇尉蔚喂 蟿峤� 蠁蠅谓萎谓蔚谓蟿伪 渭峤� 蟽蠀渭蟺委蟺蟿蔚喂谓 (蠂蠅位峤肝� 纬峤跋� 蟿峤� 蟿慰喂蠈谓未蔚), 渭畏未峤� 蟿蔚位蔚蠀蟿峋段� 魏伪峤� 峒勏佅囄迪兾肝蔽� 峒�蟺峤� 蟿峥喯� 伪峤愊勧繂蟼 蟽蠀位位伪尾峥喯�, 慰峒肺课� 蔚峒跋�慰峥ο兾� 蟽伪蠁峥�, 峒∥晃�魏伪 魏伪位维, 峒斘轿肝� 螛伪位峥喯�, 魏伪峤� 蟿慰峤合� 蟽蠀谓未苇蟽渭慰蠀蟼 蟿慰峤合� 伪峤愊勎酷胶蟼 渭峤� 蟽蠉谓蔚纬纬蠀蟼 蟿喂胃苇谓伪喂 魏伪峤� 蟿峤肝� 峒懴�蠈渭蔚谓慰谓 蟿峥� 峒∥澄肯呂嘉�谓峥� 蔚峤愇羔胶蟼 峒�谓蟿伪蟺慰未喂未蠈谓伪喂, 峤�谓蠈渭伪蟿喂 未峤� 蠂蟻峥喯兾肝蔽� {峒� 渭蔚蟿伪蠁慰蟻峋穧 峒� 蟿峥� 魏伪位位委蟽蟿峥� 峒� 蟿峥�

4 De 魏伪胃伪蟻蠈蟼 vocabuli sensu v. Peters p. 57, 5.

Eadem paullo uberius Ioannes Siceliota reddit W VI 156, 16 sq., ipsum se laudat Maximus l. l. p. 473, 6.         3 峒愇� 蟿峥喯� - 魏伪胃伪蟻伪委 om. Sy             5 未蔚峥� 未峤� Sy      6 蟽蠀谓蔚渭蟺委蟺蟿蔚喂谓 Max              7 慰峒肺课� om. Max   峤∠� 蟿峤� Io      8 蟽蠀谓未苇蟽渭慰蠀蟼 伪峤愊勎酷胶蟼 Max               9. 10 post 蔚峤愇羔胶蟼 峒�谓蟿伪蟺慰未喂未蠈谓伪喂 Io addit: 蟿慰峤合� 鈥樜嘉�谓始, 峤∠� 蟿峤� 蟿伪峥ο勎� 渭峤参� 蟿慰喂伪峥ο勎�, 峒愇何滇繓谓伪 渭苇谓蟿慰喂 峒愊勎�蟻蠅蟼, 蟿慰峤合� 鈥樜次�始, 峤∠� 蟿峤肝� 鈥樜坚讲谓始 魏伪峤� 蟿峤肝� 鈥樜次�鈥�. 魏伪峤� 蟿峤� 鈥樶健蟼始 魏伪峤� 蟿峤� 鈥樜酷綍蟿蠅蟼始           10 峒� 渭蔚蟿伪蠁慰蟻峋� 渭峤� 蟽魏位畏蟻峋� 峒� 蟿峥� 魏伪位位. Io

Cf. Dionys. Hal. de Is. p. 57, 9 Us.-R., Anaximenes 2 p. 63, 1 H.: 蟿峤� 蠁蠅谓萎蔚谓蟿伪 未峤� 渭峤� 蟿委胃蔚喂 蟺伪蟻始 峒勎晃晃肺晃�, 峒偽� 渭萎 蟺慰蟿蔚 峒勎晃幌壪� 峒�未蠉谓伪蟿慰谓 峋� 未畏位峥断兾蔽� 峒� 峒�谓维蟺蟿蠀尉喂蟼 峋� 蟿喂蟼 峒� 峒勎晃晃� 未喂伪委蟻蔚蟽喂蟼. Cf. ibid. p. 61, 24. Hinc Cicero Brut. 8,32:

峒ノ何瓜兿勎� 蟺蔚蟺慰喂畏渭苇谓峥� 峒� 蟿峥� 纬谓蠅蟻喂渭蠅蟿维蟿峥�. 峤呂幌壪� 未峤� 峤� 位蠈纬慰蟼 渭峤� 位蠈纬慰蟼 峒斚兿勏� (尉畏蟻峤肝� 纬维蟻), 峒�位位峤� 渭蔚渭委蠂胃蠅 蟺伪谓蟿峤� 峥ハ呂肝坚糠, 渭维位喂蟽蟿伪 <峒拔蔽嘉参刮横糠 峒� 蟿蟻慰蠂伪蠆魏峥�>路 未喂畏纬畏蟿苇慰谓 未峤� 蟿峤� 蟺蟻峥断勎课� 魏伪峤� 蟿峤� 未蔚蠉蟿蔚蟻慰谓 魏伪峤� 蟿峤� 位慰喂蟺峤� 峒懴�慰渭苇谓蠅蟼 魏伪峤� 渭萎, 蟺蟻峤段� 峒�蟺慰蟿蔚位苇蟽伪喂 蟿峤� 蟺蟻峥断勎课�, 峒愊�始 峒勎晃籵 峒拔�谓伪喂, 5 蔚峒断勎� 峒愊�峤� 蟿峤� 蟺蟻峥断勎课� 峒愊�伪谓喂苇谓伪喂 峒�蟺峤� 蟿慰峥� 蟿苇位慰蠀蟼.

1 post 蟺蔚蟺慰喂畏渭苇谓峥� Io addit 峤∠� 蟿峤� 蟽委味蔚喂谓 魏伪峤� 未慰峥ο�慰蟼路 蟿伪峥ο勎� 纬峤跋� 蟺蔚蟺慰喂畏渭苇谓伪 峒は勎课� 蟿峥� 纬谓蠅蟻喂渭蠅蟿维蟿峥� Io          峤呂晃肯� Syriani Marcianus hic et p. 32, 2 R., item Sy p. 30, 15 R. p. 67, 11, Ioannis Parisinus, An慰nymus W VII 963, 21, 峤呂幌壪� Io etiam p. 165, 30 Anonym. W VII 1046, 21        2 峥ハ呂肝坚糠, 渭维位喂蟽蟿伪 峒拔蔽嘉参刮横糠 峒� 蟿蟻慰蠂伪蠆魏峥� Anon. Schol. W VII 934, 1, 峒拔蔽嘉肝刮横糠 峒� 蟿蟻慰蠂伪蠆魏峥� omittunt reliqui testes, item Anonymus ipse p. 1046, 23, 峒拔蔽嘉参刮横糠 渭维位喂蟽蟿伪 峒� 蟿蟻慰蠂伪蠆魏峥� Ioannes Sic. p. 166, 2 5 蔚峒断勎� 蟺维位喂谓 峒愊�峤� 蟿峤� 蟺蟻峥断勎课� 峒愊�伪谓喂苇谓伪喂, 魏伪峤� 伪峒� 峒愊�峤� 渭苇蟻慰蟼 未峤� 未喂维谓慰喂伪喂 蟿蔚位蔚喂慰蠉蟽胃蠅蟽伪谓 峒愊喪� 峒懳毕呄勧桨蟼 蟺蔚蟻喂纬蟻伪蠁蠈渭蔚谓伪喂. 蟿伪峥ο勎� 蟺蔚蟻峤� 魏伪胃伪蟻蠈蟿畏蟿慰蟼 峒赶兾课合佄�蟿畏蟼 Io p. 157, 5

exstitit鈥� Isocrates鈥� is et ipse scripsit multa praeclare et docuit alios, et cum cetera melius quam superiores, tum primus intellexit etiam insoluta oratione, dum versum effugeres, modum tamen et numerum quendam oportere servari. Cf. Or. 52, 175 sq. Aristot. rhet. 1408 b 21 蟿峤� 未峤� 蟽蠂峥單嘉� 蟿峥喯� 位苇尉蔚蠅蟼 未蔚峥� 渭萎蟿蔚 峒斘嘉嘉迪勏佄课� 蔚峒段轿蔽� 渭萎蟿蔚 峒勏佅佅呂肝嘉课�. Cic. Orat. 57, 195: nec numerosa esse, ut poema, neque extra numerum, ut sermo vulgi, esse debet oratio. Cf. De orat. 3, 44, 175. Dionys. Hal. de comp. verb. p. 124, 21 sq. Us.-R., Quintil. inst. 9, 4, 45 sq. 鈥� p. 158, 4: Sic etiam Anaximenes 30, p. 72, 9. 38, p. 100, 12 H. Cf. Peters p. 58. Isocratis praecepta Philodemus spectare videtur, cum dicit rhet. I p. 160, 11 S.: 蟺蟻峤赶� 未峤� 蟿慰蠉蟿慰喂蟼, 峒� 魏伪峤� 蟺伪蟻维 蟿喂蟽喂 蟿峥段� 蟿蔚蠂谓慰纬蟻维蠁蠅谓 魏伪蟿伪魏蔚蠂蠋蟻喂蟽蟿伪喂, 未喂峤� 蟿峤� 魏伪蟿伪蟺蠀魏谓慰峥ξ� 蟿慰峥栂� 峤愊�蔚蟻尾维蟿慰喂蟼, 慰峤愇� 慰峤斚兾废� 峒�谓维纬魏畏蟼, 蠂蟻畏蟽喂渭蔚蠉蔚喂谓 峤懴�慰位伪渭尾维谓慰谓蟿伪蟼, 峒偽� 未峤� 峒�谓伪纬魏伪峥栁课� 峋� 蠂蟻峥喯兾肝蔽�, 渭峤� 尾蟻伪蠂蠉蟿伪蟿慰谓 峤∠� 渭维位喂蟽蟿伪 蟿慰峤怺渭 渭苇蟽峥砞 蟺慰喂蔚峥栁� 魏伪峤� 蟿峤竅谓 蟽蠉]谓未蔚[蟽渭慰谓 渭峤碷 未喂峤� [尾蟻伪蠂苇]蠅谓 峒�谓蟿伪蟺慰[未喂]未蠈谓伪喂 ...... (p. 161, 6) [蟿峥段� 蠁蟻]维[蟽蔚蠅谓] 蟿伪峥栂� [魏伪]胃蠅渭喂[位畏渭苇]谓伪喂蟼 蠂蟻峥喯兾肝蔽� 渭蔚蟿峤� 蟿慰峥� 蟺蟻苇蟺慰谓蟿慰蟼 魏伪峤� 渭萎蟿始 峒�魏蠉蟻蠅蟼 渭萎蟿蔚 魏伪胃慰位喂魏峥断� 渭萎蟿蔚 魏慰喂谓峥断� 峒�位位峤� 峥ノ废勧慷蟼 峒愇合單�蟻蔚喂谓. Cf. seq. et Philod. I p. 185, 16 sq. S., ubi l. 22 sq. 蟿慰峤合� 未鈥� 峒愊�伪魏慰[位慰蠀胃慰峥ξ絔蟿伪蟼 蟽蠉谓未蔚蟽渭慰蠀[蟼 峒�谓蟿伪蟺慰]未喂未蠈谓伪喂 supplendum videtur. Cf. infra 24. Isocr. 12, 24.

23. Maximus Planudes W V 497, 26 (Sh. 18): 慰峒� 峒埾勏勎刮何瓜兿勎贬蕉 蟺伪谓蟿蔚位峥断� 峒�蟺慰蟿蟻苇蟺慰蠀蟽喂 蟿慰峥� 峤�谓慰渭伪蟿慰蟺慰喂蔚峥栁� 魏伪峤� 渭蠈谓慰喂蟼 蟺蟻慰蟽蟿维蟿蟿慰蠀蟽喂 魏蔚蠂蟻峥喯兾肝蔽� 蟿伪峥栂� 蔚峒跋佄肺嘉�谓伪喂蟼 位苇尉蔚蟽喂 魏伪峤� 蟿慰峥栂� 蟿蔚蟿伪纬渭苇谓慰喂蟼 峤�谓蠈渭伪蟽喂谓, 峤ハ� 蠁畏蟽喂谓 峒赶兾课合佄�蟿畏蟼.

Cf. Euagorae (9) 10

24. Aristot. rhet. 1407 a 30: 峒撐� 渭峤参� 未峤� 蟿峤� 蔚峤� 峒愇� 蟿慰峥栂� 蟽蠀谓未苇蟽渭慰喂蟼, 未蔚蠉蟿蔚蟻慰谓 未峤� 蟿峤� 蟿慰峥栂� 峒拔次�慰喂蟼 峤�谓蠈渭伪蟽喂 位苇纬蔚喂谓 魏伪峤� 渭峤� 蟿慰峥栂� 蟺蔚蟻喂苇蠂慰蠀蟽喂谓.

Observabis eundem esse praeceptorum ordinem, qui auctore Syriano est apud Isocratem. Inverso ordine Anaximenes 25, p. 61, 23 蟺蟻峥断勎课� 渭峤参� 慰峤栁� 峤�谓蠈渭伪味蔚 蟿慰峥栂� 慰峒拔何滴�慰喂蟼 峤�谓蠈渭伪蟽喂谓, deinde 蟺蔚蟻峤� 蟽蠀谓未苇蟽渭蠅谓 agit. Ceterum etiam tria quae secuntur Aristotelis praecepta 蟿峤� 渭峤� 峒�渭蠁喂尾蠈位慰喂蟼 蠂蟻峥喯兾肝蔽�, 蟿峤� 蟿峤� 纬苇谓畏 蟿峥段� 峤�谓慰渭维蟿蠅谓 未喂伪喂蟻蔚峥栁�, 蟿峤� 蟿峤� 蟺慰位位峤� 魏伪峤� 峤佄晃�纬伪 魏伪峤� 峒曃� 峤�蟻胃峥断� 峤�谓慰渭维味蔚喂谓 ex antiquiorum, imprimis Isocrateorum artibus delibata esse pr慰babile videtur; ad rem cf. Wendland p. 44 sq., Peters 58.

25. Aristot. rhet. 1407 a 19: 峒斚兿勎� 未始 峒�蟻蠂峤� 蟿峥喯� 位苇尉蔚蠅蟼 蟿峤� 峒懳晃晃肺轿�味蔚喂谓. 蟿慰峥ο勎� 未始 峒斚兿勎刮� 峒愇� 蟺苇谓蟿蔚, 蟺蟻峥断勎课� 渭峤参� 峒愇� 蟿慰峥栂� 蟽蠀谓未苇蟽渭慰喂蟼, 峒偽� 峒�蟺慰未喂未峥� 蟿喂蟼 峤∠� 蟺蔚蠁蠉魏伪蟽喂 蟺蟻蠈蟿蔚蟻慰喂 魏伪峤� 峤曄兿勎迪佄课� 纬委纬谓蔚蟽胃伪喂 峒�位位萎位蠅谓, 慰峒肺课� 峒斘轿刮课� 峒�蟺伪喂蟿慰峥ο兾刮�, 峤ハ兿�蔚蟻 峤� 鈥樜坚讲谓始 魏伪峤� 峤� 鈥樶紣纬峤� 渭峤参绞� 峒�蟺伪喂蟿蔚峥� 蟿峤肝� 鈥樜瘁讲始 魏伪峤� 蟿峤肝� 鈥樶絻 未苇鈥�. 未蔚峥� 未峤� 峒曄壪� 渭苇渭谓畏蟿伪喂 峒�谓蟿伪蟺慰未喂未蠈谓伪喂 峒�位位萎位慰喂蟼 魏伪峤� 渭萎蟿蔚 渭伪魏蟻峤拔� 峒�蟺伪蟻蟿峋段� 渭萎蟿蔚 蟽蠉谓未蔚蟽渭慰谓 蟺蟻峤� 蟽蠀谓未苇蟽渭慰蠀 峒�蟺慰未喂未蠈谓伪喂 蟿慰峥� 峒�谓伪纬魏伪委慰蠀路 峤�位喂纬伪蠂慰峥� 纬峤跋� 峒佅佄枷屜勏勎滴�.

Cf. Anaximenes 25 p. 62, 5 H.: 渭蔚蟿峤� 未峤� 蟽蠀谓未苇蟽渭慰蠀蟼 慰峤撓� 峒偽� 蟺蟻慰蔚委蟺峥兿�, 峒�蟺慰未委未慰蠀 蟿慰峤合� 峒�魏慰位慰蠀胃慰峥ξ较勎毕�. 蟿峤� 渭峤参� 慰峤栁� 蟿慰峤合� 蟽蠀谓未苇蟽渭慰蠀蟼 峒�蟺慰未喂未蠈谓伪喂 蟿慰峤合� 峒�魏慰位慰蠀胃慰峥ξ较勎毕� 蟿慰喂蠈谓未蔚 峒愊兿勎�谓路 峒愇翅郊 渭峤参� 魏蟿位. At Demetrius de eloc. 53 (genus dicendi magnificum tractans): 蠂蟻峤� 未峤� 魏伪峤� 蟿慰峤合� 蟽蠀谓未苇蟽渭慰蠀蟼 渭峤� 渭维位伪 峒�谓蟿伪蟺慰未委未慰蟽胃伪喂 峒�魏蟻喂尾峥断�, 慰峒肺课� 蟿峥� 鈥樜坚讲谓始 蟽蠀谓未苇蟽渭峥� 蟿峤肝� 鈥樜次�鈥�, 渭喂魏蟻慰蟺蟻蔚蟺峤蚕� 纬峤跋� 峒� 峒�魏蟻委尾蔚喂伪 魏蟿位. Cf. ibid. 58: 慰峒� 未峤� 蟺蟻峤赶� 慰峤愇瘁讲谓 峒�谓伪蟺位畏蟻慰峥ξ较勎迪�, 蠁畏蟽委, 蟿峤肝� 蟽蠉谓未蔚蟽渭慰谓 峒愇课�魏伪蟽喂 蟿慰峥栂� 峤愊�慰魏蟻喂蟿伪峥栂� 蟿慰峥栂� 蟿峤� 魏伪峤� 蟿峤� 蟺蟻峤赶� 慰峤愇瘁讲谓 峒斚�慰蟼 位苇纬慰蠀蟽喂谓 (蠁畏蟽峤� scil. Praxiphanes). Auctor de subl. 21: 蠁苇蟻蔚 慰峤栁�, 蟺蟻蠈蟽胃蔚蟼 蟿慰峤合� 蟽蠀谓未苇蟽渭慰蠀蟼, 蔚峒� 胃苇位慰喂蟼, 峤∠� 蟺慰喂慰峥ο兾刮� 慰峒� 峒赶兾课合佄�蟿蔚喂慰喂. Epicurus apud Philod. rhet. II 259, 28 S.: 蟿伪峥ο勎� 蟿蔚 未峤� 伪峤愊勎酷繓蟼 蟺蔚蟻委蔚蟽蟿喂谓 峒愇� 蟿慰峥� 蟺蟻维纬渭伪蟿慰蟼 魏伪峤� 峒呂嘉� 蟽蠀谓未苇蟽渭慰喂蟼 峒曄�蔚蟽胃伪喂 蟺蟻慰蟽蔚蠂峥断� 魏伪峤� 蟺蟿蠋蟽蔚蟽喂谓 峒愇� 蟿慰峥栂� 位蔚纬慰渭苇谓慰喂蟼.

26. Menander 蟺蔚蟻峤� 峒愊�喂未. Rhet. gr. III, p. 339, 11 Sp. (Sh. 10): 峒� 未峤� 峒懴佄嘉肺轿滴�伪... 峒愊�峤� 峒愇晃�蟿蟿慰谓慰蟼 峒愇疚肯呄兾�伪蟼 纬蔚纬蔚谓萎蟽胃蠅, 蟽峥次段肯呄兾� 渭峤参� 蟿峤肝� 峒愊�喂未蔚喂魏蟿喂魏峤肝� 魏蠈蟽渭慰谓, 蟺慰位峤� 未峤� 蟿慰峥� 未喂胃蠀蟻维渭尾慰蠀 峒�蟺慰尾蔚尾畏魏蠀峥栁�. 纬委纬谓慰喂蟿慰 未始 <峒偽�> 蟿慰喂伪蠉蟿畏, 蔚峒� 蟿峥� 峒赶兾课合佄�蟿慰蠀蟼 胃蔚蠅蟻萎渭伪蟿喂 蠂蟻畏蟽蠈渭蔚胃伪 魏伪峤� 蟿峤� 魏维位位慰蟼 魏伪峤� 蟿峤次� 蟽蔚渭谓蠈蟿畏蟿伪 渭峤� 峒�蟺峤� 蟿峥段� 峤�谓慰渭维蟿蠅谓 渭峋段晃晃课� 峒� 蟿峥喯� 峒�蟻蠂伪喂蠈蟿畏蟿慰蟼 峒� 蟿慰峥� 渭蔚纬苇胃慰蠀蟼 胃畏蟻蠋渭蔚胃伪, 峒�位位始 峒�蟺峤� 蟿峥喯� 峒佅佄嘉课轿�伪蟼 魏伪峤� 蟿峥段� 蟽蠂畏渭维蟿蠅谓.

27. Longini artis rhet. I, p. 306, 8 Sp., 188, 21 H. (Sh. 11): 慰峤愇� 峒�蠂蟻蔚峥栁课� 未峤� 慰峤愇瘁讲 蟿峥段� 峒赶兾课合佄�蟿慰蠀蟼 蟺伪蟻伪纬纬蔚位渭维蟿蠅谓 峒愇较勏佄�蟺蔚蟽胃伪喂, 渭峤� 蟿蟻伪蠂蠉谓蔚喂谓 蟿峤肝� 位蠈纬慰谓 蟿峥� 蟺伪蟻伪胃苇蟽蔚喂 魏伪峤� 蟽蠀渭蟺位慰魏峥� 蟿峥段� 魏伪位慰蠀渭苇谓蠅谓 蠁蠅谓畏苇谓蟿蠅谓.

Cf. Ioannes Sic. W VI 102, 22 sq. Dion. Hal. de Isocr. p. 57, 9 Us.-R.

28. Schol. in Hermog. W VII, p. 930, 11 (Sh. 17) de c慰l慰 et commate: 峒�位位峤� 蟺蟻峥断勎课� 渭峤参� 峒愇课�魏伪蟽喂谓 蟿峥段� 峤�谓慰渭维蟿蠅谓 蟿慰蠉蟿蠅谓 峒愇晃肝滇繓谓 蔚峒跋� 峒斘轿轿课刮蔽� 峒愇� 峒愇疚迪勎�蟽蔚喂 位蠈纬蠅谓 慰峤� 魏伪蟿峤� 渭苇蟿蟻伪 蟺蟻o蔚谓畏谓蔚纬渭苇谓蠅谓 蠁喂位o蟽蠈蠁蠅谓 渭峤参� 峒埾佄瓜兿勎肯勎�位畏蟼 峒愇� 蟿伪峥栂� 峥ノ废勎肯佄刮何贬繓蟼 位蔚纬慰渭苇谓伪喂蟼 蟿苇蠂谓伪喂蟼, 蟽慰蠁喂蟽蟿峥段� 未峤� 峒赶兾课合佄�蟿畏蟼. 蟿委 未峤� 蟿慰蠉蟿蠅谓 峒曃何毕兿勎肯� 位苇纬蔚喂 魏伪峤� 峤呄�蠅蟼 渭峤参� 峒埾佄瓜兿勎肯勎�位畏蟼 蟿峤次� 蟺蔚蟻委慰未慰谓 峤∠佄�蟽伪蟿慰, 峤∠� 蟽蠀渭蟺位畏蟻慰峥� 蟿峤� 魏峥段晃� 魏伪峤� 蟿峤� 魏蠈渭渭伪蟿伪, 峤呄�蠅蟼 未峤� 蟺维位喂谓 峒赶兾课合佄�蟿畏蟼, 蟿峥� 螞伪蠂维蟻峥� 未蔚蠈谓蟿蠅蟼 峒愇� 蟿峥� 蟺蔚蟻峤� 伪峤愊勧慷谓 蔚峒聪佄废勎蔽� 位蠈纬峥陈� 蟺慰位位慰峤合� 纬峤跋� 峤佅佄瓜兾嘉酷胶蟼 蟿峥段� 峒�蟻蠂伪委蠅谓 蟺伪蟻伪蟿委胃畏蟽喂. 位苇纬蔚喂 纬峤跋� 魏伪峤� 峒赶兾课合佄�蟿慰蠀蟼 峤佅佄瓜兾枷屛�, 峤兾� 慰峤� 蟺伪蟻伪未苇蠂蔚蟿伪喂路 蟿峥� 纬峤跋� 峒埾佄瓜兿勎肯勎�位蔚喂 慰峤愇次滴嘉�伪 纬苇纬慰谓蔚 蟺蔚蟻峤� 伪峤愊勎酷喀 蟽蟺慰蠀未萎.

En gravissimum testimonium, quod docet iam Isocratem 峒愇� 峒愇疚迪勎�蟽蔚喂 位蠈纬蠅谓 慰峤� 魏伪蟿峤� 渭苇蟿蟻伪 蟺蟻o蔚谓畏谓蔚纬渭苇谓蠅谓 nominibus commatis, coli, perihodi esse usum. Ex quo sequitur, eos quoque, qui 蟺慰喂萎渭伪蟿伪 recensebant, perihodi nomen adhibuisse. Cf. Longinus art. rhet. p. 193, 28 H.: 峒� 蟺蔚蟻委慰未慰蟼 魏苇魏位畏蟿伪喂 峒愇� 渭蔚蟿伪蠁慰蟻峋断傗�� 峒�蟺峤� 蟿峥段� 蠂慰蟻蔚蠀蠈谓蟿蠅谓 蟺蔚蟻峤� 蟿慰峤合� 尾蠅渭慰蠉蟼, quod si verum, 蟺蔚蟻委慰未慰谓 et 蟽蟿蟻慰蠁萎谓 idem signiicasse apparet.

29. Dion. Hal. de Lysia 16/17 sq. p. 27, 12 Us.-R. (Sh. 4): 未喂伪喂蟻萎蟽慰渭伪喂鈥� 峤∠� 峒赶兾课合佄�蟿蔚喂 蟿蔚 魏伪峤� 蟿慰峥栂� 魏伪蟿始 峒愇何滇繓谓慰谓 蟿峤肝� 峒勎轿聪佄� 魏慰蟽渭慰蠀渭苇谓慰喂蟼 峒は佄迪兾滴�, 峒�蟻尉维渭蔚谓慰蟼 峒�蟺峤� 蟿峥段� 蟺蟻慰慰喂渭委蠅谓. 鈥� (p. 28, 13 sq.) 蟿伪峥ο勎�... 蟺蔚蟻喂位伪尾峤嘉� 峒愊�峤� 蟿峤次� 蟺蟻蠈胃蔚蟽喂谓 峒愊�蔚委纬蔚蟿伪喂, 未喂始 峒�蟼 蟿峤� 渭苇位位慰谓蟿伪 峒愇� 蟿伪峥栂� 峒�蟺慰未蔚委尉蔚蟽喂 位苇纬蔚蟽胃伪喂 蟺蟻慰蔚喂蟺峤嘉� 魏伪峤� 蟿峤肝� 峒�魏蟻慰伪蟿峤次� 蟺伪蟻伪蟽魏蔚蠀维蟽伪蟼 蔚峤愇嘉蔽羔繂 蟺蟻峤赶� 蟿峤肝� 渭苇位位慰谓蟿伪 位蠈纬慰谓 峒愊�峤� 蟿峤次� 未喂萎纬畏蟽喂谓 魏伪胃委蟽蟿伪蟿伪喂. 鈥� (p. 29, 17) 峒愇� 未峤� 蟿峥� 未喂畏纬蔚峥栂兾肝蔽� 蟿峤� 蟺蟻维纬渭伪蟿伪... (p. 30, 19) 峒愇� 未峤� 蟿峥� 蟺喂蟽蟿慰峥ο兾肝蔽�... 峒勏佄疚课嘉蔽� 未峤� 峒�蟺峤� 蟿峥段� 魏伪位慰蠀渭苇谓蠅谓 峒愇较勎�蠂谓蠅谓 蟺委蟽蟿蔚蠅谓... 蟿蟻喂蠂峥� 未峤� 谓蔚谓蔚渭畏渭苇谓蠅谓 蟿慰蠉蟿蠅谓, 蔚峒聪� 蟿蔚 蟿峤� 蟺蟻峋段澄嘉� 魏伪峤� 蟿峤� 峒ξ肝肯� 魏伪峤� 蟿峤� 蟺维胃慰蟼, 蟿峤� 渭峤参� 峒愇� 蟿慰峥� 蟺蟻维纬渭伪蟿慰蟼 慰峤愇次滴结礁蟼 蠂蔚峥栂佄课� 蔚峤懴佄滇繓谓 蟿蔚 魏伪峤� 峒愇疚滴瓜�蔚峥栁� 未蠉谓伪蟿伪喂 螞蠀蟽委伪蟼. 魏伪峤� 纬峤跋� 蟿慰峥� 蔚峒拔合屜勎肯� 峒勏佄瓜兿勎肯� 峤� 峒�谓峤聪� 蔚峒拔何毕兿勧酱蟼 魏伪峤� 蟿慰峥� 蟺伪蟻伪未蔚委纬渭伪蟿慰蟼 未峤� 蟿维 蟿蔚 蟽畏渭蔚峥栁�... 蔚峒跋� 蟿蔚魏渭畏蟻委蠅谓 未蠈尉伪谓 峒�纬伪纬蔚峥栁� 未蠀谓伪蟿峤枷勎毕勎肯�... (p. 32, 1) 魏峒�谓 蟿慰峥栂� 峒愊�喂位蠈纬慰喂蟼 未峤� 蟿峤� 渭峤参� 峒�谓伪魏蔚蠁伪位伪喂蠅蟿喂魏峤肝� 蟿峥段� 峥ノ肺肝�谓蟿蠅谓 渭苇蟻慰蟼... 蟿峤� 未峤� 蟺伪胃畏蟿喂魏峤肝� 峒愇何滇繓谓慰, 峒愇� 峋� 蟺伪蟻维魏位畏蟽委蟼 蟿蔚 魏伪峤� 峒斘晃滴肯� 魏伪峤� 未苇畏蟽喂蟼... 蟿慰峥� 蟺蟻慰蟽萎魏慰谓蟿慰蟼 峒愇轿次滴迪兿勎�蟻蠅蟼 峒�蟺慰未委未蠅蟽喂谓.

Singula (supra non relata), quae Dionysius de prooemii officiis, de narratione instituenda, de argumentis, de epilogis exponit, posterioribus admodum sunt decantata (de traditione apud posteriores continua Peters 24 sq). Velim etiam conferas cum iis, quae de prooemio Dionysius dicit, Demosthenis verba in Timocr. (24) 4: 蔚峒跋幬肝毕兾刮� 渭峤参� 慰峤栁� 慰峒� 蟺慰位位慰峤� 蟿峥段� 蟺蟻维蟿蟿蔚喂谓 蟿喂 蟺蟻慰伪喂蟻慰蠀渭苇谓蠅谓 蟿峥段� 魏慰喂谓峥段� 位苇纬蔚喂谓, 峤∠� 蟿伪峥ο勎� 峤愇坚繓谓 蟽蟺慰蠀未伪喂蠈蟿伪蟿维 峒愊兿勎刮� 魏伪峤� 渭维位喂蟽蟿伪 峒勎疚刮课� 蟺蟻慰蟽苇蠂蔚喂谓 蟿慰蠉蟿慰喂蟼, 峤愊�峤蚕� 峤�谓 峒偽� 伪峤愊勎酷蕉 蟿蠀纬蠂维谓蠅蟽喂 蟺慰喂慰蠉渭蔚谓慰喂 蟿慰峤合� 位蠈纬慰蠀蟼. Talia praecepta, 峒拔毕勏佄迪嵨嘉毕勎� 魏伪峤� 魏慰喂谓维 quae audiunt Arist慰teli (rhet. 1416 a 24), ut sunt pervetusta, ita fortasse in Isocratis schola primum omnibus numeris constituta, id quod viri docti imprimis ex eo consensu concluserunt, qui est inter Dionysium, Aristotelem, Amaximenem, Anonymum Segueri (Graeveni Cornutum). Cf. Marx 315 sq., Wendland 39 sq., Peters 22 sq., Suess 193 sq. Theodectae, Isocratis discipulo, haec adscripsit F. Solmsen (Herm. 67, 144 sq.), quod vix ita dici potest. 螤蟻蠈胃蔚蟽喂谓 atque 蔚峤愇嘉�胃蔚喂伪谓 a prooemio separasse videntur Isocratei (Peters 29).

30. Syrianus in Hermog. de id. I p. 93, 22 R. (Sh. 6a): 峒愇� 纬峤跋� 蟿伪峥栂� 魏伪蟿伪蟽蟿维蟽蔚蟽喂 蟿维 蟿蔚 慰峒拔何滇繓伪 蟽蠀谓喂蟽蟿峥段嘉滴� 魏伪委 蟿峤� 蟿峥段� 峒愇轿蔽较勎�蠅谓 未喂伪尾维位位慰渭蔚谓, 蟺蟻峤赶� 蟿峤� 慰峒拔何滇繓慰谓 蟽蠀渭蠁苇蟻慰谓 峒愊佄澄蔽断屛嘉滴轿课� 蟿峤跋� 魏伪蟿伪蟽蟿维蟽蔚喂蟼, 峤∠� 峒赶兾课合佄�蟿畏蟼 峒愇次�未伪尉蔚谓.

Indidem Maximus Planudes et Anon. in Hermog. W V 551, 10 sq.

31. Syrianus in Hermog. de id. I p. 25, 1 R.: 魏伪峤� 纬峤跋� 峒赶兾课合佄�蟿畏蟼 峒愇� 蟿峥� 峥ノ废勎肯佄刮横繃 蟿苇蠂谓峥� 未喂未维蟽魏蠅谓, 峤呄�蠅蟼 蠂蟻峤� 未喂畏纬蔚峥栂兾肝蔽�, 蠁畏蟽委螄 未喂畏纬畏蟿苇慰谓 未峤� 蟿蠈 蟿蔚 蟺蟻峋段澄嘉� 魏伪峤� 蟿峤� 蟺蟻峤� 蟿慰峥� 蟺蟻维纬渭伪蟿慰蟼 魏伪峤� 蟿峤� 渭蔚蟿峤� 蟿峤� 蟺蟻峋段澄嘉� 魏伪峤� 蟿峤跋� 未喂伪谓慰委伪蟼, 伪峒废� 峒懳何�蟿蔚蟻慰蟼 蟿峥段� 峒�纬蠅谓喂味慰渭苇谓蠅谓 峒斚�蟻伪尉蔚 蟿蠈未蔚 蟿喂.

Haec Arstot. tangit rhet. 1417 a 28. 36 (Marx 321).

32. Idem in Hermog. II 65, 3 R. (Sh. 5): 魏伪峤� 纬峤跋� 峒赶兾课合佄�蟿畏蟼 峒愇� 蟿峥� 蟿苇蠂谓峥� 蠁畏蟽委谓, 峤∠� 峒愇� 蟿峥� 未喂畏纬萎蟽蔚喂 位蔚魏蟿苇慰谓 蟿蠈 蟿蔚 蟺蟻峋段澄嘉� 魏伪峤� 蟿峤� 蟺蟻峤� 蟿慰峥� 蟺蟻维纬渭伪蟿慰蟼 魏伪峤� 蟿峤� 渭蔚蟿峤� 蟿峤� 蟺蟻峋段澄嘉� 魏伪峤� 蟿峤跋� 未喂伪谓慰委伪蟼, 伪峒废� 峒懳何�蟿蔚蟻慰蟼 蟿峥段� 峒�纬蠅谓喂味慰渭苇谓蠅谓 蠂蟻蠋渭蔚谓慰蟼 蟿蠈未蔚 蟿喂 蟺苇蟺蟻伪蠂蔚谓.

33. Idem ibid. II, p. 170, 23 (Sh. 6): 渭维位喂蟽蟿伪 未峤� 蟿峤� 蟺伪蟻始 峒赶兾课合佄�蟿慰蠀蟼 蔚峤� 峒愊囅屛较勏壪� 蔚峒跋佄肺嘉�谓慰谓 峒愇� 蟿峥� 蟿苇蠂谓峥� 渭谓畏渭慰谓蔚蠀蟿苇慰谓 峤∠� 蟺蔚蟻喂蟽魏慰蟺畏蟿苇慰谓 峒愇� 蟿峥� 魏伪蟿伪蟽蟿维蟽蔚喂 蟿蠈 蟿蔚 蟺蟻峋段澄嘉� 魏伪峤� 蟿峤� 蟺蟻峤� 蟿慰峥� 蟺蟻维纬渭伪蟿慰蟼 魏伪峤� 蟿峤� 渭蔚蟿峤� 蟿峤� 蟺蟻峋段澄嘉� 魏伪峤� 蟿峤跋� 未喂伪谓慰委伪蟼, 伪峒废� 峒懳何�蟿蔚蟻慰蟼 蟿峥段� 峒�纬蠅谓喂味慰渭苇谓蠅谓 蟿蠈未蔚 蟿喂 蟺苇蟺蟻伪蠂蔚谓 峒� 渭苇位位蔚喂 蟺蟻维蟿蟿蔚喂谓, 魏伪峤� 蟿慰蠉蟿蠅谓 蟿慰峥栂� 蟽蠀渭尾伪位位慰渭苇谓慰喂蟼 峒∥坚繓谓 蠂蟻畏蟽蟿苇慰谓.

Non sibi constat Syrianus, sed tertiam formam laudat Sopater W IV 712, 23, secundam Anon. W VII 721, 17, primam alter Anonymus W VII 917, 16, omnes ex Syriano. Putes tamen 魏伪蟿维蟽蟿伪蟽喂谓 re vera narrationem ab Isocrateis esse dictam. Ad rem (蟺蔚蟻峤� 未喂伪谓慰委伪蟼) v. etiam Pl枚bst p. 32sq.

34. Quint. inst. 4, 2, 31 (Sh. 14. 15): (de narrati慰ne) eam plerique scriptores maximeque qui sunt ab Isocrate volunt esse lucidam, brevem, veri similem. neque enim refert, an pro lucida perspicuam, pro veri simili probabilem credibilemve dicamus.

I. e. 蟽伪蠁峥�, 蟽蠉谓蟿慰渭慰谓, 蟺喂胃伪谓萎谓. Confer Anon. rhet. l. p. 365, 6 H. (Graeveni Cornutus est): 蟿峥喯� 未喂畏纬萎蟽蔚蠅蟼 蟿峤跋� 峒�蟻蔚蟿维蟼 蠁伪渭蔚谓 蟿萎谓 蟿蔚 蟽蠀谓蟿慰渭委伪谓 魏伪峤� 蟿峤次� 蟽伪蠁萎谓蔚喂伪谓 魏伪峤� 蟿峤次� 蟺喂胃伪谓蠈蟿畏蟿伪, Rufi rhet. p. 402, 14 H., Dion. de Lysia p. 30, 2 Us.-R., qui 峒赶兾课合佄�蟿蔚喂 蟿蔚 魏伪峤� 蟿慰峥栂� 魏伪蟿始 峒愇何滇繓谓慰谓 蟿峤肝� 峒勎轿聪佄� 魏慰蟽渭慰蠀渭苇谓慰喂蟼 峒�蟻苇蟽魏慰谓蟿伪 se tradere dicit ibid. p. 27, 13 (v. supra 29). Isocratem aperte sequitur Anaximenes 30 p. 72, 1 H.: 未蔚峥� 蟿慰蠉蟿蠅谓 峒曃何毕兿勎课� 蟺慰喂蔚峥栁� 尾蟻伪蠂苇蠅蟼 魏伪峤� 蟽伪蠁峥断� 魏伪峤� 渭峤� 峒�蟺委蟽蟿蠅蟼 魏蟿位. De doctrinae propagatione v. Spengel ad Anaximenem p. 214 sq. Schol. ABT Il. E 9. Isocratem impugnat Aristot. rhet. 1416 b 30, quod notat Quintilianus loco supra exhibito addens: eadem nobis placet divisio, quamquam et Aristoteles ab Isocrate parte in una dissenserit, praeceptum brevitatis irridens. V. B XXII 6, Isocratis ipsius 21, 2. 7, 19. 19, 4. Ceterum cf. Marx p. 320 sq. Wendland 39 sq. Peters 57 sq.

35. Georgius Pletho W VI 587, 9 (Spengel Aristot. Rhet. II 360): 伪峒� 未峤� 蟿峥喯� 峒懴佄嘉肺轿滴�伪蟼 蟿慰峥� 位蠈纬慰蠀 蟿苇蟽蟽伪蟻蔚蟼 峒�蟻蔚蟿伪委, 渭峋段晃晃课� 未峤� 蟿慰峥� 未喂未伪蟽魏伪位喂魏慰峥� 魏伪峤� 峒毕兿勎肯佄刮何酷喀, 魏伪胃蔚蟽蟿萎魏伪蟽喂谓 伪峒滴次德� 蟽伪蠁萎谓蔚喂伪, 蟽蠀谓蟿慰渭委伪, 蟺喂胃伪谓蠈蟿畏蟼, 渭蔚纬伪位慰蟺蟻苇蟺蔚喂伪, 峤∠� 峒赶兾课合佄�蟿蔚喂 魏伪峤� 峒樜枷�蔚未慰魏位蔚峥�, 螖喂慰谓蠀蟽委峥�, 桅喂位慰蟽蟿蟻维蟿峥�, 峒肝蔽嘉参晃�蠂峥� 魏伪峤� 蟺峋断兾� 蟺伪位伪喂慰峥栂� 魏伪峤� 蟿慰峥栂� 蟽慰蠁蠅蟿苇蟻慰喂蟼 蟿峥段� 谓苇蠅谓 未慰魏蔚峥�.

Cf. B XXII 6. Tribus Isocratis virtutibus 蟿峤� 峒∥聪� addit Anon. Seg. p. 369, 19 H, sicut Dionysius de Lysia p. 30, 3 U.-R., is quidem, postquam antea de 鈥淚socrate eiusque asseclis鈥� locutus est. Cf. de Demosth. p. 167, 1.

36. Theon Progymn. Rhet. Gr. II p. 92, 24 Sp.: 未喂萎纬畏蟽喂谓 未峤� 未喂畏纬萎蟽蔚喂 蟽蠀渭蟺位苇魏蔚喂谓 峒愊兿勎�谓, 峤呄勎蔽� 未蠉慰 未喂畏纬萎蟽蔚喂蟼 峒� 魏伪峤� 蟺位蔚委慰蠀蟼 峒呂嘉� 未喂畏纬蔚峥栂兾肝蔽� 峒愊�喂蠂蔚喂蟻峥段嘉滴�. 蟿慰峥ο勎� 未峤� 渭维位伪 峒愊�蔚蟿萎未蔚蠀蟽伪谓 慰峒� 峒�蟺峤� 峒赶兾课合佄�蟿慰蠀蟼 魏伪峤� 伪峤愊勧礁蟼 峤� 峒赶兾课合佄�蟿畏蟼 峒愇� 蟿峥� 螤伪谓畏纬蠀蟻喂魏峥� 慰峤曄勏壪�. (54) 峒ξ晃肝课� 慰峒� 胃始 峒┫佄蔽何晃�慰蠀蟼 蟺伪峥栁次迪� 魏伪峤� 渭喂魏蟻峤肝� 蟺蟻峤� 蟿慰蠉蟿蠅谓 峒埼聪佄毕兿勎肯� 峤� 韦伪位伪慰峥�, 尾伪蟽喂位蔚峤合� 峤⑽� 峒屜佄澄肯呄�, 慰峤椣勎肯� 渭峤参� 峒愇� 蟿峥喯� 蟽蟿蟻伪蟿蔚委伪蟼 蟿峥喯� 峒愊�峤� 螛萎尾伪蟼 未蔚未蠀蟽蟿蠀蠂畏魏峤枷� 魏伪峤� 蟿峤� 峒懳踞繂蟼. 魏伪峤� 蟺维位喂谓螄 (68) 峒斚勎� 纬峤跋� 蟿伪蟺蔚喂谓峥喯� 慰峤斚兾废� 蟿峥喯� 峒櫸晃晃�未慰蟼 峒ξ晃肝课� 蔚峒跋� 蟿峤次� 蠂蠋蟻伪谓 峒∥坚慷谓 螛蟻峋肺何迪� 渭峤参� 渭蔚蟿峤� 螘峤愇枷屛幌�慰蠀 蟿慰峥� 螤慰蟽蔚喂未峥段轿肯�, 危魏蠉胃伪喂 未峤� 渭蔚蟿峤� 峒埼嘉蔽断屛较壩� 蟿峥段� 峒埾佄迪壪� 胃蠀纬伪蟿苇蟻蠅谓 慰峤� 魏伪蟿峤� 蟿峤肝� 伪峤愊勧礁谓 蠂蟻蠈谓慰谓 魏伪峤� 蟿峤� 峒懳踞繂蟼. Aliud est praeceptum atque ea, quae antecedunt.

37. Quint. inst. 3, 4, 11 (Sh. 12): Isocrates in 慰mni genere inesse laudem ac vituperationem existimavit.

Scil. proprium genus laudationum non agnovit, cf. 蟺蔚蟻峤� 峒�谓蟿喂未. (15) 45 sq.

38. Ioannes Sic. Schol. 蔚峒跋� 峒肝次滇慷谓 尾鈥� VI 478, 23 W: 蟺蟻峥断勎肯� 峒赶兾课合佄�蟿畏蟼 峒愇轿迪壪勎�蟻喂蟽蔚谓, 纬蟻维蠄伪蟼 峒愇澄合幬嘉刮�.

Cf. Maximus Plan. V 554, 4 W, Diogenes Laert. 2, 55.

39. Quint. inst. 3, 5, 18 (Sh. 13): Isocrates autem causam esse ait quaestionem finitam civilem aut rem controversam in personarum finitarum complexu.

Socrates cod. Ambrosianus. Thiele, Herm. 27, 13 sq.

40. Catalogus librorum bibliothecae rhetoris alicuius Rhodi repertus (Gn慰mon II 196): 魏伪蟿伪未蟻慰渭峤� (Isocratis) 蟿峥哰蟼鈥�] 未喂伪蟿蟻喂尾峥哰蟼].

Vitae Isocrateae auctor (Or. Att. II 5 a 24, Westermann, Biogr. gr. 257, 26): 蔚峒� 未苇 蟿喂谓蔚蟼 峒愊�蔚喂蟽维纬慰蠀蟽喂谓 峒勎晃晃肯呄� 蟿喂谓峤跋� 位蠈纬慰蠀蟼 峤∠� 峤勎较勎毕� 伪峤愊勎酷喀, 慰峤� 蟺蟻慰蟽未蔚魏蟿苇慰谓 峒愇何滴�谓慰蠀蟼 蟺伪蟻峤� 蟿慰峤合� 蠁蔚蟻慰渭苇谓慰蠀蟼. Sequitur spuriorum catalogus, ultimus titulus est 魏伪蟿伪未蟻慰渭峤� 蟽慰蠁喂蟽蟿峥段�.