大象传媒

A. INITIA ARTIS

 

I. RHETORIKE PENES DEOS

 

            1. Isocr. 13.2: 峒�位位峤� 蟿慰蟽慰峥ο勎课� 峒�蟺苇蠂慰渭蔚谓 蟿伪蠉蟿畏蟼 蟿峥喯� 蠁蟻慰谓萎蟽蔚蠅蟼, 峤ハ兾甘� 峤嵨嘉废佄肯� 峤� 渭蔚纬委蟽蟿畏谓 峒愊�峤� 蟽慰蠁委峋� 未蠈尉伪谓 蔚峒拔晃废嗎郊蟼 魏伪峤� 蟿慰峥ο� 胃蔚慰蠉蟼 蟺蔚蟺慰委畏魏蔚谓 峒斚兿勎刮� 峤呄勎� 尾慰蠀位蔚蠀慰渭苇谓慰蠀蟼 峤懴�峤蚕� 伪峤愊勧慷谓 (sc. 蟿峥段� 渭蔚位位蠈谓蟿蠅谓).

                  Indidem Aristid. de rhet. (45) II p. 19 Di. (16.15): 蟿峤� 峒愇� 峒�蟻蠂峥喯� 峒� 蟿峥段� 位蠈纬蠅谓 未蠉谓伪渭喂蟼 蟺伪蟻峤� 胃蔚峥段� 峒�魏蔚谓 蔚峒跋� 峒�谓胃蟻蠋蟺慰蠀蟼, De dis contionem habentibus vel in iudicio certantibus v. Prol. artis rhet. P. S. p. 21, TroilI Prol. p.51.5 sq., Ioannis Doxapatri in Aphthon. p. 91.5 sq., Prol. in Aphthon. p. 163.12., Prol. in Hermog. 蟺. 蟽蟿 ibid. p. 188.15, Sopatros W. V5.30. Hanc etiam Chrysippus Stoicus traditionem sequitur 蟺伪蟻伪尾喂伪味蠈渭蔚谓慰蟼 蔚峤愊佅嵨肯�伪 螝蟻慰谓委未畏谓 蔚峒段轿蔽� 蟿峤肝� 未蔚喂谓峤肝� 峒愊� 蟿峥� 未喂伪位苇纬蔚蟽胃伪喂 魏伪峤� 未喂伪尾蔚尾畏魏蠈蟿伪 蟿峥� 未蠀谓维渭蔚喂 蟿慰峥� 位蠈纬慰蠀 (Plutarch. de aud. poet. 31 E = frg. ll 101 Arn.).

 

            2. Proclus in rem publ. Platonis 1.69.4 Kroll: 峤� 未峤� 蟺蔚喂胃慰峥ο� 未畏渭喂慰蠀蟻纬峤赶� 慰峤愇� 峒勎晃晃肯� 峒� 峤� 峥疚曄佄坚繂蟼, 未喂始 峤兾� 魏伪峤� 未畏渭畏纬慰蟻慰峥ο兾刮� 峒勎晃晃课� 胃蔚慰峤� 魏伪蟿始 峒勎晃晃肯呄�.

            Apollo et Hermes de furto orationibus certantes iudice Iove inducuntur ab Hymni Homerici 4 poeta. Cf. Prol. artis rhet. P. S. p. 22.2 sq.

 

            3. Schol. Hom. B ad Y 67 (apud Dielsium, Vorsokratiker 72.2): de Homero (蠁伪蟽峤段� 伪峤愊勧礁谓) 峤佄嘉课�蠅蟼 峒斚兾甘� 峤呄勎� 魏伪峤� 蟿伪峥栂� 未喂伪胃苇蟽蔚蟽喂 峤�谓蠈渭伪蟿伪 胃蔚峥段� 蟿喂胃苇谓伪喂 . . . 蟿峥� 位蠈纬峥� 未峤� 蟿峤肝� 峒櫹佄坚繂谓, 魏伪峤� 蟺蟻慰蟽慰喂魏蔚喂慰峥ο兾� 蟿慰蠉蟿慰喂蟼. 慰峤椣勎肯� 渭峤参� 慰峤栁� <峤�> 蟿蟻蠈蟺慰蟼 峒�蟺慰位慰纬委伪蟼 峒�蟻蠂伪峥栁肯� 峤⑽� 蟺维谓蠀 魏伪峤� 峒�蟺峤� 螛蔚伪纬苇谓慰蠀蟼 蟿慰峥� 峥�畏纬委谓慰蠀 魏蟿位.

            Huius interpretationis videtur esse vestigi.um apud Philodemum rhet. II p. 171 . VII: S. et II p. 289 fr. XIII b.

 

            4. Plato Crat. 407E: 峒埼晃会桨 渭峤次� 蟿慰峥ο勏� 纬蔚 峒斘课刮何� 蟺蔚蟻峤� 位蠈纬慰谓 蟿喂 蔚峒段轿蔽� 峤� 峒櫹佄坚繂蟼, 魏伪峤� 蟿峤� 峒愊佄嘉肺轿�伪 蔚峒段轿蔽� 魏伪峤� 蟿峤� 峒勎澄澄滴晃课� 魏伪峤� 蟿峤� 魏位慰蟺喂魏蠈谓 蟿蔚 魏伪峤� 蟿峤� 峒�蟺伪蟿畏位峤肝� 峒愇� 位蠈纬慰喂蟼 魏伪峤� 蟿峤� 峒�纬慰蟻伪蟽蟿喂魏蠈谓, 蟺蔚蟻峤� 位蠈纬慰蠀 未蠉谓伪渭委谓 峒愊兿勎� 蟺峋断兾� 伪峤曄勎� 峒� 蟺蟻伪纬渭伪蟿蔚委伪.

                  Sequitur etymologia 峒�蟺峤� 蟿慰峥� 蔚峒聪佄滴刮� (蟿峤� 未峤� 位苇纬蔚喂谓 未萎 峒愊兿勎刮� 蔚峒聪佄滴刮�) 渭萎蟽伪蟽胃伪喂. Hesiodi Erg. 79 (de Pandora) 峒愇� 未始 峒勏佄� 蠁蠅谓峤次� 胃峥單何� 胃蔚峥段� 魏萎蟻蠀尉 ex interpolatione natum putant.

 

            5. Diog. Oenoand. fr. X col. II-III W. (Epicur.): 魏伪峤� 蟿峥段� 蠁胃蠈纬纬蠅谓 未峤� 峒曃轿滴何滴�, 位苇纬蠅 未峤� 蟿峥段� 蟿蔚 峤�谓慰渭维蟿蠅谓 魏伪峤� 蟿峥段� 峥ノ肺嘉�蟿蠅谓, 峤�谓 峒愊�慰喂萎蟽伪谓蟿慰 蟿峤跋� 蟺蟻蠋蟿伪蟼 峒�谓伪蠁胃苇纬尉蔚喂蟼 慰峒� 峒�蟺峤� 纬峥喯� 蠁蠉谓蟿蔚蟼 [峒勎轿赶佅塢蟺慰喂. 渭萎蟿蔚 蟿峤肝� 螘蟻渭峥單� 蟺伪蟻伪位伪渭尾维谓蠅渭蔚谓 蔚峒跋� 未喂未伪蟽魏伪位委伪谓, 峤ハ� 蠁伪蟽委谓 蟿喂谓蔚蟼, 蟺蔚蟻喂蠁伪谓峤聪� 纬峤跋� 伪峤曄勎� 纬蔚 峒�未慰位蔚蟽蠂委伪, 渭萎蟿蔚 魏蟿位.

                  蟿喂谓蔚蟼: sic Hecataeus Abderita apud Diodorum Bibl. I 16: 峤愊�峤� 纬峤跋� 蟿慰蠉蟿慰蠀 (sc. 螘蟻渭慰峥�) 蟺蟻峥断勎课� 渭峤参� 蟿萎谓 蟿蔚 魏慰喂谓峤次� 未喂维位蔚魏蟿慰谓 未喂伪蟻胃蟻蠅胃峥單轿蔽� 魏伪峤� 蟺慰位位峤� 蟿峥段� 峒�谓蠅谓蠉渭蠅谓 蟿蠀蠂蔚峥栁� 蟺蟻慰蟽畏纬慰蟻委伪蟼. Distinguendum inter Mercurium linguae inventorem et eloquentiae, qualis apud rhetores produci solet, verum plena non est distinctio.

 

            6. Cornutus epidromae p. 20.18 Lang: 蟿蠀纬蠂维谓蔚喂 未峤� 峤� 峒櫹佄坚繂蟼 峤� 位蠈纬慰蟼 峤の�, 峤兾� 峒�蟺苇蟽蟿蔚喂位伪谓 蟺蟻峤赶� 峒∥坚径蟼 峒愇� 慰峤愊佄蔽轿酷喀 慰峒� 胃蔚慰委, 渭蠈谓慰谓 蟿峤肝� 峒勎轿赶佅壪�慰谓 蟿峥段� 峒愊�峤� 纬峥喯� 味峥聪壩� 位慰纬喂魏峤肝� 蟺慰喂萎蟽伪谓蟿蔚蟼, 峤� 蟺伪蟻峤� 蟿峒單晃晃� 峒愇疚肯囅幭勎毕勎课� 蔚峒断囄课� 伪峤愊勎课�. 峤犖较屛嘉毕兿勎蔽� 未始 峒�蟺峤� 蟿慰峥� 峒斚佄滇繓谓 渭萎蟽伪蟽胃伪喂, 峤呄�蔚蟻 峒愊兿勧蕉 位苇纬蔚喂谓.

                  Cf. Etym. Magn. 376.20 蟺伪蟻峤� 蟿峤� 峒愊佱慷 蟿峤� 位苇纬蠅.

 

            7. Idem ibid. p. 25.14: 位伪谓胃维谓蔚喂 纬峤跋� 峤愊單蔽瓜佄肯嵨嘉滴轿肯� 蟿峤� 蟺蟻慰未蔚未慰纬渭苇谓伪 蟿慰峥栂� 峒�谓胃蟻蠋蟺慰喂蟼 魏伪峤� 魏位苇蟺蟿蠅谓 峒斚兾甘� 峤呄勎� 蟿峥� 蟺喂胃伪谓蠈蟿畏蟿喂 蟿峤次� 峒�位萎胃蔚喂伪谓, 峤呂肝滴� 蟿喂谓峤蚕� 魏伪峤� <峤蚕�委魏位慰蟺慰谓 伪峤愊勧礁谓 未喂峤� 蟿峤�> 峒愊�喂魏位蠈蟺慰喂蟼 位蠈纬慰喂蟼 蠂蟻峥喯兾肝蔽� 位苇纬慰蠀蟽喂路 魏伪峤� 纬峤跋� 蟿峤� 蟽慰蠁委味蔚蟽胃伪喂 蟿峥段� 蔚峒拔聪屜勏壩� 位蠈纬峥� 蠂蟻峥喯兾肝蔽� 峒次次瓜屛� 峒愊兿勎�.

                  3 峤呂肝滴� 蟿喂谓峤跋� libri

 

            8. Aristid. de rhet. (45) II p. 135 Di (100.14): 峤� 未蔚 螙蔚峤合� 蟿慰峥� 蟿蔚 螤蟻慰渭畏胃苇蠅蟼 峒�纬伪蟽胃蔚峤断� 未委魏伪喂伪 位苇纬慰谓蟿慰蟼 (sc. de hominum inopia) 魏伪峤� 峒呂嘉� 魏伪胃始 峒懳毕呄勧礁谓 蔚峒拔晃废嗎郊蟼 位慰纬喂蟽渭峤肝� 蟿慰峥� 蟺蟻维纬渭伪蟿慰蟼 蟿峥段� 伪峤懴勎酷喀 蟺伪委未蠅谓 峒櫹佄坚繂谓 魏蔚位蔚蠉蔚喂 峥ノ废勎肯佄刮横酱谓 峒斚囄课较勎� 峒愇晃肝滇繓谓 蔚峒跋� 峒�谓胃蟻蠋蟺慰蠀蟼 . . . 蟿峤肝� 未峤� 峒櫹佄坚繂谓 慰峤愊� 慰峤曄勏壪� 峒愇何�位蔚蠀蟽蔚谓 峤ハ兿�蔚蟻 胃蔚蠅蟻喂魏慰峥� 未喂维未慰蟽喂谓 未喂蔚位蔚峥栁�, 峒滴轿� 蟺维谓蟿蔚蟼 峥ノ废勎肯佄刮横繂蟼 峒愊單滴踞繂蟼 渭蔚蟿苇蠂慰喂蔚谓, 峤ハ兿�蔚蟻 峤�蠁胃伪位渭峥段� 魏伪峤� 蠂蔚喂蟻峥段� 魏伪峤� 蟺慰未峥段�, 峒�位位始 峒愊�喂位蔚尉维渭蔚谓慰谓 蟿慰峤合� 峒�蟻委蟽蟿慰蠀蟼 魏伪峤� 纬蔚谓谓伪喂慰蟿维蟿慰蠀蟼 魏伪峤� 蟿峤跋� 蠁蠉蟽蔚喂蟼 峒愊佅佅壩嘉滴轿迪兿勎�蟿慰蠀蟼, 蟿慰蠉蟿慰喂蟼 峒愇诚囄滴瓜佄�蟽伪喂 蟿峤� 未峥断佄课�, 峒滴绞� 峤佄嘉酷喀 蟽蠁峋断� 蟿蔚 伪峤愊勎酷胶蟼 魏伪峤� 蟿慰峥ο� 峒勎晃晃肯呄� 蟽峥次段滴刮� 峒斚囄课刮滴� 魏蟿位.

                  Mythum quem profert Aristides atque in sequentibus multis coloribus exornat, ex variis fontibus composuit. Mercurium rhetoricae inventorem alibiquoque laudat A., cf. II p. 14 IDi (13.7), p. 18 Di. (16.2); eiusdem artis tut慰r est ibid. p. 143 Di. (106.12), 位蠈纬慰喂蟼 p. 5 Di. (5.1, p. 18 Di. (16.3. Consentiunt rhetores doctores, v. Prol. sylloge 20.8. 15, 90.23, 163.2, Schol. Thuc纬d. VI 27.1 p. 341.10 H. Euemeristicae rationis vestigium, secundum quam Hermes homo fuit inlustris 蟺伪喂未蔚蠀蟿峤聪� 位蠈纬蠅谓, Ioannes Sardianus p. 164.15 sq. R. servavit.

 

            9.Pseudodion. artis rhet. p. 285.8 Usener: 渭维位喂蟽蟿伪 未峤� 慰峒� 峒�胃位畏蟿伪峤� 未苇慰喂谓蟿慰 峒偽� 蟿峥喯� 峒�蟺峤� 蟿慰峥� 位蠈纬慰蠀 蟺蟻慰蟿蟻慰蟺峥喯� 魏伪峤� 峒愊�喂魏蔚位蔚蠉蟽蔚蠅蟼, 峤勎较勎迪� 渭峤参� 魏伪峤� 伪峤愊勎酷蕉 峒櫹佄嘉酷喀 蟿蔚 魏伪峤� 峒┫佄蔽何晃�慰蠀蟼 渭伪胃畏蟿伪委 蟿蔚 魏伪峤� 味畏位蠅蟿伪委, 峤�谓 峤� 渭峤参� 蔚峤懴佄迪勧酱蟼 蟿慰峥� 位蠈纬慰蠀 峒� 伪峤愊勧礁 蠂蟻峥單嘉� 位蠈纬慰蟼 ...

                  Cf. Inscr. Kalybiis-Chassiis reperta, aetatis imperatorum: 峒櫹佄坚繃 位慰纬喂蟽渭峥� 蠂峥断佄课� 峤嵪僛蟿维谓畏蟼 未喂未慰蟿(7) D. arch. Mi喂t., Ath. A bt. 62 (1937, 9 N. 8. Augustinus De civ. dei 7.14: Sermo ipse dicitur esse Mercurius. Hae opiniones quam late dispersae sint, Acta docent Apost. 14.11 sq. 慰峒� 蟿蔚 峤呄囄晃课� 峒拔聪屛较勎迪�, 峤� 峒愊�慰委畏蟽蔚谓 螤伪峥ξ晃肯�, 峒愊�峥喯佄蔽� 蟿峤次� 蠁蠅谓峤次� 伪峤愊勧慷谓 螞蠀魏伪慰谓喂蟽蟿峤� 位苇纬慰谓蟿蔚蟼 慰峒� 胃蔚慰峤� 峤佄嘉课瓜壩肝�谓蟿蔚蟼 峒�谓胃蟻蠋蟺慰喂蟼 魏伪蟿苇尾畏蟽伪谓 蟺蟻峤赶� 萎渭峋断�. 峒愇何�位慰蠀谓 蟿蔚 蟿峤肝� 螔伪蟻谓维尾伪谓 螖委伪, 蟿峤肝� 未峤� 螤伪峥ξ晃课� 螘蟻渭峥單�, 峒愊�蔚喂未峤� 伪峤愊勧礁蟼 峒∥� 峤� 萎纬慰蠉渭蔚谓慰蟼 蟿慰峥� 位蠈纬o蠀. Inde Hermes 峒懴佄嘉肺轿迪嵪�, 峒�纬慰蟻伪峥栁肯�, 位蠈纬喂慰蟼, 蟺蔚喂蟽委谓慰蠀蟼, 位蠈纬慰蠀 胃谓畏蟿慰峥栂兾� 蟺蟻慰蠁萎蟿畏蟼, 鈥渟ermonis dator鈥� in cultibus posteriorum (Eitrem, RE. 8.781 sq.). Sed communem posteriorum opinionem testimoniis amplius confirmare iam taedet; unum addo, cum 峒櫹佄坚繂谓 位慰纬喂蟽渭蠈谓 quoque induxerim, tum temporis inter 位蠈纬慰谓 et 位慰纬喂蟽渭蠈谓 non esse distinctum, id quod loci in praefatione Plutarchi M慰r. Vol. VII sd. Bernardakis p. XXIX inter se oppositi egregie docent.

 

螜螜. HEROUM RHETORICE

 

            1. Plato Crat. 398 D: 魏伪峤� 峒は勎课� 蟿慰峥ο勎� 位苇纬蔚喂 蟿慰峤合� 峒ハ佅壩毕�, 峒� 峤呄勎� 蟽慰蠁慰峤� 峒ο兾蔽� 魏伪峤� 峥ノ�蟿慰蟻蔚蟼 {魏伪峤秨 未蔚喂谓慰峤� 魏伪峤� 未喂伪位蔚魏蟿喂魏慰峤� 峒愊佅壪勧径谓 峒蔽何蔽轿酷蕉 峤勎较勎迪�. 蟿峤� 纬峤跋� 峒愊佄滇繓谓 位苇纬蔚喂谓 峒愊兿勎�谓. 峤呄�蔚蟻 慰峤栁� 峒勏佅勎� 位苇纬慰渭蔚谓, 峒愇� 蟿峥� 峒埾勏勎刮横繃 蠁蠅谓峥� 位蔚纬蠈渭蔚谓慰喂 慰峒� 峒ハ佅壩迪� 峥ノ�蟿慰蟻苇蟼 蟿喂谓蔚蟼 魏伪峤� 峒愊佅壪勎废勎刮何酷蕉 蟽蠀渭尾伪委谓慰蠀蟽喂谓, 峤ハ兿勎� 峥ノ废勏屜佅壩� 魏伪峤� 蟽慰蠁喂蟽蟿峥段� 纬苇谓慰蟼 纬委纬谓蔚蟿伪喂 蟿峤� 峒∠佅壩刮横礁谓 蠁峥ξ晃课�.

            Respiciunt Prol. in Hermog. P. S. p. 188.18 R., Sopatros in Hermog. V 6. 1 W.

 

            2. Cratinus 围蔚委蟻蠅蟽喂谓 fr. 1 Mein. (Bekk. Anecd. p. 535.13):

 M伪魏维蟻喂慰蟼 峒ξ� 峤� 蟺蟻峤� 蟿慰峥� 尾委慰蟼

 尾蟻慰蟿慰峥栂兾� 蟺蟻峤赶� 蟿峤� 谓峥ξ�, 峤兾� 蔚峒断囄课� 峒勎轿聪佄迪�

 峒�纬伪谓蠈蠁蟻慰谓蔚蟼 峒∥聪呂幌屛翅砍 蟽慰蠁委峋�

 尾蟻慰蟿峥段� 蟺蔚蟻喂蟽蟽慰魏伪位位蔚峥栂�.

            Intelleguntur, qui Chironis aetate erant. 峒∥聪嵨晃课澄肯� 蟽慰蠁委伪 i. e. rhetorice.

 

            3. Isocr. 12 (Panath.) 204-6: 纬谓蠋蟽蔚喂 未始 峤∠� 峒愊兿勧蕉 蟿慰喂慰峥ο勎肯�, 峒⑽� 峒愊佅壪勎�蟽峥兿� 蟿喂谓峤跋� 蟿峥段� 蔚峤� 蠁蟻慰谓慰蠉谓蟿蠅谓, 蟺慰峥栁� 蟿峥段� 峒愊�喂蟿畏未蔚蠀渭维蟿蠅谓 魏维位位喂蟽蟿伪 谓慰渭委味慰蠀蟽喂谓 蔚峒段轿蔽�, 魏伪峤� 渭蔚蟿峤� 蟿伪峥ο勎� 蟺蠈蟽慰蟼 蠂蟻蠈谓慰蟼 峒愊兿勎�谓, 峒愇� 慰峤� 危蟺伪蟻蟿喂峋断勎蔽� 蟿蠀纬蠂维谓慰蠀蟽喂谓 峒愇� 螤蔚位慰蟺慰谓谓萎蟽峥� 魏伪蟿慰喂魏o峥ξ较勎迪�. 慰峤愇次滇繓蟼 纬峤跋� 峤呄兿勎瓜� 慰峤� 蟿峥段� 渭峤参� 峒愊�喂蟿畏未蔚蠀渭维蟿蠅谓 蟺蟻慰魏蟻喂谓蔚峥� 蟿峤次� 蔚峤愊兾�尾蔚喂伪谓 蟿峤次� 蟺蔚蟻峤� 蟿慰峥ο� 胃蔚慰峥ο� 魏伪峤� 蟿峤次� 未喂魏伪喂慰蟽蠉谓畏谓 蟿峤次� 蟺蔚蟻峤� 蟿慰峥ο� 峒�谓胃蟻蠋蟺慰蠀蟼 魏伪峤� 蟿峤次� 蠁蟻蠈谓畏蟽喂谓 蟿峤次� 蟺蔚蟻峤� 蟿峤跋� 峒勎晃晃毕� 蟺蟻维尉蔚喂蟼, 危蟺伪蟻蟿喂维蟿伪蟼 未始 峒愇较勎贬喀胃伪 魏伪蟿慰喂魏蔚峥栁� 慰峤� 蟺位蔚委蠅 蠁萎蟽慰蠀蟽喂谓 峒愊勧慷谓 峒懴�蟿伪魏慰蟽委蠅谓. 蟿慰蠉蟿蠅谓 未始 慰峤曄勏壪� 峒愊囅屛较勏壩� 蔚峒� 渭峤参� 蟿蠀纬蠂维谓蔚喂蟼 峒�位畏胃峥� 位苇纬蠅谓, 蟿慰蠉蟿慰蠀蟼 蠁维蟽魏蠅谓 蔚峤懴佄迪勧桨蟼 纬蔚纬蔚谓峥喯兾肝蔽� 蟿峥段� 魏伪位位委蟽蟿蠅谓 峒愊�喂蟿畏未蔚蠀渭维蟿蠅谓, 峒�谓伪纬魏伪峥栂屛� 峒愊兿勎� 蟿慰峥ο� 蟺慰位位伪峥栂� 纬蔚谓蔚伪峥栂� 蟺蟻蠈蟿蔚蟻慰谓 纬蔚纬慰谓蠈蟿伪蟼 蟺蟻峤段� 危蟺伪蟻蟿喂维蟿伪蟼 峒愇较勎贬喀胃伪 魏伪蟿慰喂魏峥喯兾蔽�, 渭峤� 渭蔚蟿苇蠂蔚喂谓 伪峤愊勧慷谓, 渭萎蟿蔚 蟿慰峥ο� 峒愊�峤� 韦蟻慰委伪谓 蟽蟿蟻伪蟿蔚蠀蟽伪渭苇谓慰蠀蟼 渭萎蟿蔚 蟿慰峥ο� 蟺蔚蟻峤� 峒┫佄蔽何晃�伪 魏伪峤� 螛畏蟽苇伪 纬蔚纬慰谓蠈蟿伪蟼 渭萎蟿蔚 螠委谓蠅 蟿峤肝� 螖喂峤赶� 渭萎蟿蔚 峥�伪未维渭伪谓胃蠀谓 渭萎蟿始 峒堘及伪魏峤肝� 渭萎蟿蔚 蟿峥段� 峒勎晃幌壩� 渭畏未苇谓伪 蟿峥段� 峤懳嘉轿肯呂嘉�谓蠅谓 峒愊�峤� 蟿伪峥栂� 峒�蟻蔚蟿伪峥栂� 蟿伪蠉蟿伪喂蟼, 峒�位位峤� 蠄蔚蠀未峥� 蟿峤次� 未蠈尉伪谓 蟿伪蠉蟿畏谓 峒呄�伪谓蟿伪蟼 峒斚囄滴刮�. 蔚峒� 未峤� 蟽峤� 渭峤参� 蠁位蠀伪蟻峥段� 蟿蠀纬蠂维谓蔚喂蟼, 蟺蟻慰蟽萎魏蔚喂 未峤� 蟿慰峥ο� 峒�蟺峤� 胃蔚峥段� 纬蔚纬慰谓蠈蟿伪蟼 魏伪峤� 蠂蟻峥喯兾肝蔽� 蟿伪蠉蟿伪喂蟼 渭峋段晃晃课� 蟿峥段� 峒勎晃幌壩� 魏伪峤� 魏伪蟿伪未蔚峥栁疚蔽� 蟿慰峥栂� 峒愊�喂纬喂纬谓慰渭苇谓慰喂蟼, 慰峤愇� 峒斚兿勎刮� 峤呄�蠅蟼 慰峤� 渭伪委谓蔚蟽胃伪喂 未蠈尉蔚喂蟼 峒呄�伪蟽喂 蟿慰峥栂� 峒�魏慰蠉蟽伪蟽喂谓.

            9 蔚峒� 渭峤参� 蟽峤� alii (蟽峤� om. 2)          15 蟿峥段� 谓峥ξ� 峤懳嘉轿肯呂嘉�谓蠅谓 v. l.     17 未峤� 魏伪峤� 蟿慰峤合� v. l.                    19 峒�魏慰蠉慰蠀蟽喂谓 v. l.

            Aristot. Polit. 3.14 1285b3 蟿苇蟿伪蟻蟿慰谓 未始 蔚峒段次肯� 渭慰谓伪蟻蠂委伪蟼 尾伪蟽喂位喂魏峥喯� 伪峒� 魏伪蟿峤� 蟿慰峤合� 峒∠壩刮何酷胶蟼 蠂蟻蠈谓慰蠀蟼 峒懳何肯嵪兾刮蔽� 蟿蔚 魏伪峤� 蟺维蟿蟻喂伪喂 纬喂纬谓蠈渭蔚谓伪喂 魏伪蟿峤� 谓蠈渭慰谓. 未喂峤� 纬峤跋� 蟿峤� 蟿慰峤合� 蟺蟻峤枷勎肯呄� 纬蔚谓苇蟽胃伪喂 蟿慰峥� 蟺位萎胃慰蠀蟼 蔚峤愇迪佄澄�蟿伪蟼 魏伪蟿峤� 蟿苇蠂谓伪蟼 峒� 蟺蠈位蔚渭慰谓鈥� 峒愇澄�纬谓慰谓蟿伪 尾伪蟽喂位蔚峥栂� 峒愇合屛较勏壩�...

 

            4. Plato Phaedr. 261 B (doctrinam illudens): 危蠅. 峒�位位始 峒� 蟿峤跋� 螡苇蟽蟿慰蟻慰蟼 魏伪峤� 峤埼聪呄兿兾�蠅蟼 蟿苇蠂谓伪蟼 渭蠈谓慰谓 蟺蔚蟻峤� 位蠈纬蠅谓 峒�魏萎魏慰伪蟼, 峒兿� 峒愇� I位委峥� 蟽蠂慰位维味慰谓蟿蔚 蟽蠀谓蔚纬蟻伪蠄维蟿畏谓, 蟿峥段� 未峤� 螤伪位伪渭萎未慰蠀蟼 峒�谓萎魏慰慰蟼 纬苇纬慰谓伪蟼;

            Ludere pergens Plato Phaedrum respondentem fingit ne se quidem Nestoris novisse artes, sed fortasse Gorgiam a Socrate Nestorem quondam intellegi, vel Ulixem quendam esse Thrasymachum vel Theodorum. Ipsum Ulixem artis rhetoricae peritum iam quarto a. C. saeculo visum esse etiam Antisthenis interpretationum Homericarum fragmentum in Porphyrii ad Odysseam Quaestionibus servatum (infra B XIX 10) docet, quo fragmento Ulixis 蟺慰位蠉蟿蟻慰蟺慰蟼 cognomen ita explicatur, ut variarum orandi flexionum, quibus eaedem sententiae proferuntur, potens vocetur. Iterum Plato Phaedri 269 A ad 蟿峤肝� 渭蔚位委纬畏蟻蠀谓 峒埼聪佄毕兿勎课� 峒� 魏伪峤� 螤蔚蟻喂魏位苇伪 provocat tamquam rhetoricae artis censores, quo loco qui Antiphontem sub Adrasti nomine latere coniecerunt, acumen verborum vix videntur perspexisse. Tyrtaei verba (fr. 9.8 D) a Platone respici monuit Spengel. Notabis Adrasti declamationes apud posteriores exstare, eundem adparere inter heroas eloquentes apud Philodemum (infra A II 7 adn.).

 

            5. Philod. rhet. II p. 71 fr. VIII 5 Sudh.: 慰峤� 魏蟻蔚委谓蠅 未峤� 蟺伪位喂谓位慰纬蔚峥栁� 峒�谓伪纬魏伪峥栁课� 蔚峒段轿蔽� 蟿峥喯� 峒�蟺慰未蔚委尉蔚蠅蟼 魏伪蟿维 纬蔚 蟿峤次� 未蠉谓伪渭喂谓 慰峤愇羔讲谓 未喂伪蠁蔚蟻慰蠉蟽畏蟼 蟿慰峥� 未喂未维蟽魏慰谓蟿慰蟼 位蠈纬慰蠀 峒ハ佅壩毕� 峒は勎课� [峒拔次瓜幭刔伪蟼, 渭峤� 渭伪胃蠈谓蟿伪蟼 蟿峤次� 峥ノ废勎肯佄刮何�谓, 未蠀谓[伪]蟿慰[峤合� 峥ノ废勎肯佄迪嵨滴刮� 纬蔚纬慰谓苇]谓伪喂.

             3 位蠈纬慰蠀蟼 P

 

            6. Philod. rhet. II p. 119 fr. XVI 8: 峒�魏慰[位慰蠉胃]蠅蟼 未[峤� 魏伪]峤� 未喂伪位蔚[蠂胃蔚]峤断� 蟺蔚[蟻峤� 蟿峥禲谓 峒∠佅嶽蠅谓], 峤呄勎� 未[蠀]谓伪蟿慰峤� [位]苇[纬蔚喂谓] 峒ο兾蔽�, 峒愊�喂蟽蠀谓维蠄[伪蟼] . ..

            2 未喂伪位蔚蠂胃蔚委蟼: quis? An Theodorus Cyrenaeus? (Sudh. l. l. p. 116 fr. 1X 6.) - 峤呄勎� P

 

            7. Philod. rhet. II p. 201 fr. XV: [蟿峤次� 未峤� 蟿慰]喂伪蠉蟿畏谓 [未]蠉谓伪- 渭喂谓, 慰峒滴蔽� [蔚]峒禰蠂]蔚谓 峤埼聪匸蟽蟽蔚峤合俔 魏伪峤� 螡苇蟽蟿蠅蟻 魏伪[峤� 危蠈]位蠅谓 魏伪峤� 螛蔚[渭喂蟽蟿慰魏位峥喯� 魏伪峤� 螤]蔚蟻喂魏位[峥喯�, 峥ノ穄蟿慰蟻喂[魏萎谓.

Cf. Philod. rhet. II p. 76 fr. III p. 77 fr. IV, ubi de heroibus serm慰 est, Odysseus et Adrastus nominantur, Stoicus impugnatur, ingeniose suppleta a Sudhausio. Inde Aristid. or. 46, II p. 180 Di., Periclem, Ulixem, Nestora componit, ubi scholion (III p. 480, 16 Di.) 蟺维位喂谓 峥ノ�蟿慰蟻蟽喂 蟺伪蟻伪尾维位位蔚喂 蟿峤肝� 螤蔚蟻喂魏位苇伪路 峥ノ�蟿慰蟻蔚蟼 纬峤跋� 峒ο兾蔽� 慰峤椣勎课� 蟿慰峥� 峒櫸晃晃肺轿刮何酷喀 蟽蟿蟻伪蟿蔚蠉渭伪蟿慰蟼.

 

            8. Syrianus in Hermogenem c慰mm. II p. 7.3 Rabe: 蟿峤� 未峤� 鈥氠紣尉 峒�蟻蠂峥喯� 未畏位伪未峤词� 峒�蠁始 慰峤椣�蔚蟻 峒� 蟿峥段� 峒�谓胃蟻蠋蟺蠅谓 峤懴�苇蟽蟿畏 蠁蠉蟽喂蟼路 蟽蠉谓未蟻慰渭慰蟼 纬峤跋� 峒� 峥ノ废勎肯佄刮横酱 蟿峥� 位蠈纬峥� 蟿峥段� 蠄蠀蠂峥段�, 魏伪峤� 蟺蟻峤� 螡苇蟽蟿慰蟻蠈蟼 蟿蔚 魏伪峤� 桅慰委谓喂魏慰蟼 螤伪位伪渭萎未慰蠀蟼 蟿蔚 魏伪峤� 峤埼聪呄兿兾�蠅蟼 魏伪峤� 蟿峥段� 峒愇� 峒肝晃�峥� 峥ノ废勏屜佅壩� 峒犗兾何滇繓蟿慰 蟺伪蟻峤� 峒�谓胃蟻蠋蟺慰喂蟼 峒� 峥ノ废勎肯佄刮何�, 蔚峒� 纬蔚 魏伪峤� 蟿峤肝� 韦蟻慰喂- 味萎谓喂慰谓 螤喂蟿胃苇伪 蠁伪蟽峤段� 峒斘轿刮课� 位蠈纬蠅谓 峒愇� 韦蟻慰喂味峥單轿� 蟿苇蠂谓伪蟼 纬蟻维蠁蔚喂谓 蟿蔚 魏伪峤� 未喂未维蟽魏蔚喂谓 峒�谓胃蟻蠋蟺慰蠀蟼, 蟿慰峤合� 未峤� 峒�谓蠅蟿苇蟻蠅 蟿慰蠉蟿蠅谓 蟿峤� 蟺蟻峋段澄嘉� 蟽峤何� 峒�蟻蔚蟿峥� 渭蔚蟿伪未喂蠋尉伪谓蟿伪蟼 峒� 峒愇� 蟿慰峥� 魏伪蟿伪魏位蠀蟽渭慰峥� 蟽峤何� 蟿慰峥栂� 峒勎晃晃课瓜� 峒犗單�谓喂魏蔚 位萎胃畏.

 螤喂蟿胃苇蠅蟼 nomen a verbo 蟺蔚委胃蠅 ductum ansam dedit: Paus. II 31.3 (4) de Musarum Troezeni sanctuario: 峒愇较勎贬喀胃伪 桅喂蟿胃苇伪 未喂未维尉伪喂 位蠈纬蠅谓 蟿苇蠂谓畏谓 蠁伪蟽峤� 魏伪委 蟿喂 尾喂尾位委慰谓 桅喂蟿胃苇蠅蟼 未峤� 蟽蠉纬纬蟻伪渭渭伪, 峤懴�峤� 峒�谓未蟻峤赶� 峒愇何次课羔讲谓 峒樝�喂未伪蠀蟻委慰蠀, 魏伪峤� 伪峤愊勧礁蟼 峒愊�蔚位蔚尉维渭畏谓. Erat enim Pittheus 峒�谓峤聪� 位蠈纬喂慰蟼 峒愇� 蟿慰峥栂� 蟿蠈蟿蔚 魏伪峤� 蟽慰蠁蠋蟿伪蟿慰蟼 secundum Plutarchum Thes. 3, cf. Schol. Euripidis Hippol. 11. Haec igitur traditio aetate imperatorum Romanorum antiquior fuit. Est tamen etiam mirabilius, quod legitur apud Philodemum rhet. I p. 337 col. XXX S. 蟺蟻峥断勎课� 渭峤参� 蟿慰委谓蠀谓 蟺蟻慰蟽蔚魏蟿苇慰谓 峒ξ�, 渭萎蟺慰蟿始 慰峤愇� 峒�蠁伪喂蟻峥� 蟿峥段� 谓蔚蠅蟿苇蟻蠅谓 蟿峤肝� 蟺蠈胃慰谓 蟿峥喯� 峥ノ废勎肯佄刮横繂蟼, 峒�位位始 峒愊�喂蟿蔚委谓畏 未喂峤� 蟿峥段� 魏伪蟿畏纬慰蟻喂峥段�. 螝峒偽� 纬峤跋� 峒愇枷單蔽结慷蟼 峒勎晃晃� 蟿喂 位苇纬蠅蟽喂谓, 胃伪峥ξ嘉� 蔚峒段轿蔽� 蟿峤次� 慰峤曄勏� 纬蔚 蟺[蟻伪魏蟿]喂魏峤次� 未蠉[谓伪渭]喂谓 慰峒蔽课絒蔚峤禲 渭蔚渭蠀胃蔚蠀渭苇谓畏谓 [蟺蔚蟻峤� 蟿]峤肝� 螒峤愊勏屛幌呂篬慰谓 魏伪峤� 蟿慰峤篯蟼 峤佄嘉课�慰蠀蟼. Itaque non solum Odysseus, verum etiam avus eius Autolycus in oratorum numerum relati sunt, ac memineris de certamine inter Autolycum et Sisyphum facto. Ipse quidem Demosthenes Aeschini Sisyphus arudit or. II 43, cuius nomen apud Philodemum apparet loco ceteroquin misere mutilo rhet. II p. 170 fr. V S.

 

            9. Prol. in Hermogenis 蟺蔚蟻峤� 蟽蟿维蟽蔚蠅谓 P. S. 189.7 R. = W VII 5/6: 位苇纬慰蠀蟽喂 未苇 蟿喂谓蔚蟼 未喂魏伪谓喂魏峤肝� 位蠈纬慰谓 蔚峒跋佄肺何�谓伪喂 蟺蟻峥断勎课� 螠蔚谓蔚蟽胃苇伪 蟿峤肝� 蟽蟿蟻伪蟿畏纬峤肝� 蟿峥段� 峒埼肝肺轿蔽�蠅谓, 峤兿� 魏伪峤� 峒愊�峤� 韦蟻慰委伪谓 峒�蠁委魏蔚蟿慰 {峋段晃晃课� 未峤� 位苇纬慰蠀蟽喂谓 峒埼较勎瓜嗎慷谓蟿伪 蟿慰峥ο勎课� 蟿峤肝� 峥ノ�蟿慰蟻伪}, 魏伪蟿<畏纬o蟻o峥ξ较�>伪 螛畏蟽苇蠅蟼 蟺蔚蟻峤� 蟿峥段� 螤伪位位伪谓蟿喂未峥段�.

Cf. Sopatri W v 6.12. Plut. Thes. 32 sq., unde haec ex aliqu慰 atthidographo fluxisse adparet. Libanius, or. 64.21.

 

III. HOMERUS TESTIS HEROUM RHETORICAE

 

            1. Eratosthenes apud Strabonem A 2.5 (C. 17): 峒� 未峤� 峥ノ废勎肯佄刮横酱 蠁蟻蠈谓畏蟽委蟼 峒愊兿勎� 未萎蟺慰蠀 蟺蔚蟻峤� 位蠈纬慰蠀蟼, 峒Ｎ� 峒愊�喂未蔚委魏谓蠀蟿伪喂 (sc. Homerus) 蟺伪蟻始 峤呂晃肺� 蟿峤次� 蟺慰委畏蟽喂谓 {峤埼聪呄兿兾滇胶蟼} 峒愇� 蟿峥� 未喂伪蟺蔚委蟻峋�, 峒愇� 蟿伪峥栂� 位喂蟿伪峥栂�, 峒愇� 蟿峥� 蟺蟻蔚蟽尾蔚委峋�, 峒愇� 峋� 蠁畏蟽喂谓路 峒�位位始 峤呄勎� 未峤� 峤勏�伪 蟿蔚 渭蔚纬维位畏谓 峒愇� 蟽蟿萎胃蔚慰蟼 蔚峒滴� 魏伪峤� 峒斚�蔚伪 谓喂蠁维未蔚蟽蟽喂谓 峒愇课刮合屜勎� 蠂蔚喂渭蔚蟻委峥兿兾刮�, 慰峤愇� 峒偽� 峒斚�蔚喂蟿始 峤埼聪呄冡繂委 纬始 峒愊佄�蟽蟽蔚喂蔚 尾蟻慰蟿峤赶� 峒勎晃晃肯�.

 

            2. Cic. Brut. 40: neque enim iam Troicis temporibus tantum laudis in dicendo Ulixi tribuisset Homerus et Nestori, quorum alterum vim habere voluit, alterum suavitatem. Ibid. 50: Menelaum ipsum dulcem illum quidem tradit Homerus, sed pauca dicentem.

 

            3. Quint. inst. 12.10.64: nam et Homerus brevem quidem cum iocunditate et propriam (id enim est 鈥榥on deerrare verbis始) et carentem supervacuis eloquentiam Menelao dedit, quae sunt virtutes generis illius primi, et ex ore Nestoris dixit dulciorem 5 melle profluere sermonem始, qua certe delectatione nihil fingi maius potest; sed summam expressurus {est} in Ulixe facundiam et magnitudinem illi vocis et vim orationis nivibus {et} copia verborum atque impetu parem tribuit.

            6 regressurus 7 illi vicisset cum orationi.

 

            4. Gell. 6.14.7: sed ea ipsa genera dicendi iam antiquitus tradita ab Homero sunt tria in tribus: magnificum in Ulixe et ubertum, subtile in Menelao et cohibitum, mixtum moderatumque in Nestore.

 

            5. [Plut.] de vita et p慰esi Homeri 172: 慰峤愇� 峒犖嘉�位畏蟽蔚 未始 慰峤愇瘁讲 蠂伪蟻伪魏蟿畏蟻委蟽伪喂 蟿慰峥ο� 峥ノ�蟿慰蟻伪蟼. 蟿峤肝� 渭峤参� 纬峤跋� 螡苇蟽蟿慰蟻伪 峒∥瘁胶谓 魏伪峤� 蟺蟻慰蟽畏谓峥� 蟿慰峥栂� 峒�魏慰蠉慰蠀蟽喂谓 蔚峒跋兾�纬蔚喂, 蟿峤肝� 未峤� 螠蔚谓苇位伪慰谓 尾蟻伪蠂蠀位蠈纬慰谓 魏伪峤� 蔚峤斚囄毕佄刮� 魏伪峤� 蟿慰峥� 蟺蟻慰魏蔚喂渭苇谓慰蠀 蟿蠀纬蠂维谓慰谓蟿伪, 蟿峤肝� 未始 峤埼聪呄兿兾�伪 蟺慰位位峥� 魏伪峤� 蟺蠀魏谓峥� 蟿峥� 未蔚喂谓蠈蟿畏蟿喂 蟿峥段� 位蠈纬蠅谓 魏蔚蠂蟻畏渭苇谓慰谓. 蟿伪峥ο勎� 纬峤跋� 蟿慰峥栂� 未蠀蟽峤� 蟿慰蠉蟿慰喂蟼 峒ハ佅壪兾刮� 峤� 峒埼较勎�谓蠅蟻 渭伪蟻蟿蠀蟻蔚峥�, 峒�魏慰蠉蟽伪蟼 伪峤愊勧慷谓, 峤佅�蠈蟿蔚 蟺蟻蔚蟽尾蔚蠉慰谓蟿蔚蟼 峒�蠁委魏慰谓蟿慰 蔚峒跋� 蟿峤次� 峒嘉晃刮课�.

 

            6. Sopatros in Hermogenem c慰mm. W V 6.3: 蠁伪委谓蔚蟿伪喂 未峤� 魏伪峤� 峤� 蟺慰喂畏蟿峤聪� 蟺伪谓蟿慰峥栁� 蔚峒拔瘁郊蟼 峥ノ废勎肯佄刮横繂蟼 蟺伪蟻伪未蔚委纬渭伪蟿伪. 蟿峤肝� 渭峤参� 纬峤跋� 蟿伪蠂蠉谓 魏伪峤� 蟽蠉谓蟿慰渭慰谓 魏伪峤� 峒�蟺慰未蔚喂魏蟿喂魏峤肝� 峥ノ�蟿慰蟻维 蠁畏蟽喂 位苇纬蔚喂谓 谓喂蠁维未蔚蟽蟽喂谓 峤呂嘉课刮� 魏伪峤� 蟿峤肝� 蟺蠀魏谓峤肝� 魏伪峤� 蟽蠉谓蟿慰渭慰谓, 慰峤愇瘁讲谓 未峤� 峒�蟿蟿慰谓 峒�蟺慰未蔚喂魏蟿喂魏峤肝� 蟺伪峥ο佄� 渭苇谓, 峒�位位峤� 渭维位伪 位喂纬苇蠅蟼. 慰峒段次滴� 未峤� 蟿峤次� 峒�蟿伪尉委伪谓 蟿峥喯� 未畏渭伪纬蠅纬委伪蟼 魏伪峤� 蟿慰峤合� 峒�未喂伪魏蟻委蟿蠅蟼 魏伪峤� 峒愇较勎�蠂谓蠅蟼 位苇纬慰谓蟿伪蟼 峤佅�慰峥栁课� 蟺慰蟿苇 蔚峒跋兾刮�, 峤ハ兿�蔚蟻 蟿峤肝� 螛蔚蟻蟽委蟿畏谓, 峤呄� 峥モ�� 峒斚�蔚伪 蠁蟻蔚蟽峤段� 峋椣兾刮� 峒勎何肯兾嘉� 蟿蔚 蟺慰位位维 蟿蔚 峒ノ次滴�.

            Cf. Sen. epist. 40.2. Auson. pr慰f. Burd. XXI 16 grat. act. VIII 19, epist. 12.10 sq. p. 239 P.

 

            7. Prol. art. rhet. an慰n. P. S. p. 22.14 R.: 未蔚蠉蟿蔚蟻慰谓 未苇 峒愊兿勎� 魏蔚蠁维位伪喂慰谓, 峒愇� 峋� 峒愇晃�纬蠂慰渭蔚谓, 蔚峒� 魏伪峤� 峒愇� 峒ハ佅壪兾刮� 峒� 峥ノ废勎肯佄刮何�. 峒斘次滴� 纬峤跋� 魏伪峤� 魏伪位峥断� 峒斘次滴� 蟿峤� 蟿峥段� 胃蔚峥段� 未畏渭喂慰蠀蟻纬萎渭伪蟿伪 蟿慰峤合� 峒愇� 胃蔚峥段� 蠁伪谓苇谓蟿伪蟼 蟺蟻蠋蟿慰蠀蟼 魏伪蟻蟺蠋蟽伪蟽胃伪喂. 峒斚兿勏� 蟿慰委谓蠀谓 蟿慰蠉蟿蠅谓 峒佅�维谓蟿蠅谓 渭维蟻蟿蠀蟼  峤� 胃蔚蟽蟺苇蟽喂慰蟼 峒∥坚繓谓 魏伪峤� 峒蔽迪佄肯單�谓蟿畏蟼 峤嵨嘉废佄肯�, 峤兿� 蔚峒跋� 蠁伪谓蔚蟻蠈谓 蟿蔚 魏伪峤� 蟽伪蠁峤蚕� 峒の澄蔽澄� 蟿峤跋� 蟺蔚蟻峤� 蟿慰蠉蟿蠅谓 味畏蟿萎蟽蔚喂蟼 峒∥坚繓谓. 慰峤椣勎肯� 纬峤跋� 尾慰蠀位蠈渭蔚谓慰蟼 蟽畏渭峋段轿蔽� 峒∥坚繓谓, 峤呄勎� 峒愇� 蟿慰峥栂� 峒ハ佅壪兾刮� 峒懳何毕勎�蟻伪 蟺慰喂蠈蟿畏蟼 蟿峥喯� 峥ノ废勎肯佄刮横繂蟼 蔚峤曄佄废勎蔽�, 蔚峒跋兾�纬蔚喂 蟿峤肝� 螡苇蟽蟿慰蟻伪 蟽蠉渭尾慰蠀位慰谓 峤勎较勎�, 蟺蔚蟻峤� 慰峤� 位苇纬蔚喂路

                                    蟿慰峥栂兾� 未峤� 螡峒愊兿勏壪� 峒∥聪呂迪�峤聪� 峒�谓蠈蟻慰蠀蟽蔚, 位喂纬峤合� 螤蠀位委蠅谓 峒�纬慰蟻畏蟿萎蟼, 蟿慰峥� 魏伪峤� 峒�蟺峤� 纬位蠋蟽蟽畏蟼 渭苇位喂蟿慰蟼 纬位蠀魏委蠅谓 峥ノ�蔚谓 伪峤愇次�.

            螝伪峤� 蟿峤� 渭苇谓 纬位蠀魏峤� 魏伪峤� 蟺蟻慰蟽畏谓峤蚕� 蟿峥喯� 峥ノ废勎肯佄刮横繂蟼 峒斚囄滴刮� 蟿峤肝� 螡苇蟽蟿慰蟻伪 峒愇疚�蠁畏谓蔚谓 峤� 蟺慰喂畏蟿萎蟼路 蟿峤� 未峤� 蟽蠉谓蟿慰谓慰谓 魏伪峤� 峒愊�委蠂伪蟻喂 未喂峤� 蟿慰峥� 螠蔚谓蔚位维慰蠀 峒愇轿次滴�魏谓蠀蟿伪喂, 蔚峒跋�峤嘉� 蟺蔚蟻峤� 伪峤愊勎酷喀路

                                    峒�位位始 峒は勎课� M蔚谓苇位伪慰蟼 峒愊�喂蟿蟻慰蠂维未畏谓 峒�纬蠈蟻蔚蠀蔚

                                    蟺伪峥ο佄� 渭苇谓, 峒�位位峤� 渭维位伪 位喂纬苇蠅蟼.

蔚峒跋兿單�蟻蔚喂 未峤� 魏伪峤� 蟿峤肝� 峤埼聪呄兿兾�伪, 蟿峤� 蟿蟻慰蠂伪位峤肝� 魏伪峤� 峤�尉峤� 魏伪峤� 蟿峤� 蟽蠁慰未蟻峤肝� 魏伪峤� 蟿峤� 位伪渭蟺蟻峤肝� 蟿峥喯� 峥ノ废勎肯佄刮横繂蟼 未喂始 伪峤愊勎酷喀 蔚峒拔何课轿�蟽伪喂 尾慰蠀位蠈渭蔚谓慰蟼, 位苇纬蠅谓 蟺蔚蟻峤� 伪峤愊勎酷喀路

                                    峒�位位始 峤呄勎� 未峤� 峤勏�伪 蟿蔚 渭蔚纬维位畏谓 峒愇� 蟽蟿萎胃蔚慰蟼 蔚峒滴�,

                                    魏伪峤� 峒斚�蔚伪 谓喂蠁维未蔚蟽蟽喂谓 峒愇课刮合屜勎� 蠂蔚喂渭蔚蟻委峥兿兾刮�,

                                    慰峤愇� 峒偽� 峒斚�蔚喂蟿始 峤埼聪呄冡繃委 纬始 峒愊佄�蟽蟽蔚喂蔚 尾蟻慰蟿峤赶� 峒勎晃晃肯�.

峤呄勎� 未峤� 魏伪峤� 蟿峤� 峤勎轿课嘉� 蟿峥喯� 峥ノ废勎肯佄刮横繂蟼 峒ξ� 峒愇澄较壪兾嘉�谓慰谓 蟿慰峥栂� 峒ハ佅壪兾�, 蠁苇蟻蔚喂 蟿峤肝� 桅慰委谓喂魏伪 蟺蟻峤赶� 蟿峤肝� 峒埾囄刮晃晃�伪 位苇纬慰谓蟿伪路

                                    蟿慰峤斘轿滴何� 渭蔚 蟺蟻o苇畏魏蔚 未喂未伪蟽魏苇渭蔚谓伪喂 蟿维未蔚 蟺维谓蟿伪,

                                    渭蠉胃蠅谓 蟿蔚 峥ノ废勧繂蟻始 峒斘嘉滴轿蔽� 蟺蟻畏魏蟿峥喯佄� 蟿蔚 峒斚佄诚壩�.

峤呄勎� 未峤� 魏伪峤� 胃蔚委伪蟼 峒愊�喂蟺谓慰委伪蟼 蠂蟻峥勎段滴� 峤� 峥ノ�蟿蠅蟻, 峒愇� 伪峤愊勎酷喀 蟿慰峥� 峤壩嘉�蟻慰蠀 峒斚兿勎� 蟺喂蟽蟿蠋蟽伪蟽胃伪喂路 蠁畏蟽峤� 纬维蟻路

                                    峒�位位峤� 胃蔚峤赶� 渭慰蟻蠁峤次� 峒斚�蔚蟽喂 蟽蟿苇蠁蔚喂, 慰峒� 未苇 蟿始 峒愊� 伪峤愊勧礁谓

                                    蟿蔚蟻蟺蠈渭蔚谓慰喂 位蔚蠉蟽蟽慰蠀蟽喂谓, 峤� 未始 峒�蟽蠁伪位苇蠅蟼 峒�纬慰蟻蔚蠉蔚喂.

            23 sq. cf. Philod. rhet. I p. 187.22 sq., Cic. de orat. 3,57, Brut. 13,50, Aristid. de rhet. (45) p. 30 sq. Di. (25), Doxapatri in Aphthonium P. S. p. 91.8 sq, Schol. Townl. Il. I 443, Eustathius ad Il. I 441. Lysiam, Dem慰sthenem, Isocratem in comparationem vocat Schol. ABT ad 螕 212 (216), Eustathius ad 螕 213.

Aliter Troili Prol. p. 51.10 R.: 峒�蟺峤� 未峤� 蟿峥段� 胃蔚峥段� 蔚峒跋� 蟿慰峤合� 峒ハ佅壩毕� 峒ξ晃肝�, 魏伪峤� 蟿慰峥ο勎� 蟺维位喂谓 峒愇次�位蠅蟽蔚谓 峤� 峤嵨嘉废佄肯� 蟺蟻慰蟽维蠄伪蟼 蟿峥� M蔚谓蔚位维峥� 蟿峤� 蟽蠀渭尾慰蠀位蔚蠀蟿喂魏峤肝� 未喂峤� 蟿慰峥� 蔚峒跋�蔚峥栁铰�

                        蟺伪峥ο佄� 渭峤参� 峒�位位峤� 渭维位伪 位喂纬苇蠅蟼 峒�纬蠈蟻蔚蠀蔚,

蟿峤� 未峤� 蟺伪谓畏纬蠀蟻喂魏峤肝� 蟿峥� 螡苇蟽蟿慰蟻喂, 峒愇� 慰峒废� 位苇纬蔚喂路

                        蟿慰峥� 魏伪峤� 峒�蟺峤� 纬位蠋蟽蟽畏蟼 渭苇位喂蟿慰蟼 纬位蠀魏委蠅谓 峥ノ�蔚谓 伪峤愇次�,

蟿伪峥ο勎� 未始 峒愇澄合壩嘉刮毕兿勎刮何� 蔚峒跋兾� 蟺位峤次� 未蔚委魏谓蠀蟽喂谓, 峤∠� 蠂蟻蔚委伪 蟿峤肝� 峒愇澄合壩嘉刮�味慰谓蟿伪 魏伪峤�

纬位蠀魏峤何� 蔚峒段轿蔽� 魏伪蟿峤� 蟺蟻慰蠁慰蟻峤拔� 魏伪峤� 蟺蔚喂胃萎谓喂慰谓, 峒斘轿肝� 蠁畏蟽委路

                        魏伪峤� 峒斚�蔚伪 谓喂蠁维未蔚蟽蟽喂谓 峒愇课刮合屜勎� 蠂蔚喂渭蔚蟻委峥兿兾�,

蟿峤� 未喂魏伪谓喂魏峤肝� 峒�蟺慰未喂未慰峤合� 蟿峥� 峤埼聪呄兿兾滇繓.

            Similes ineptiae leguntur in posteriorum commentariis P. S. p. 93.1 sq., p. 188.21 sq., p. 268.11 sq. R. Auctorem habent Telephum Pergamenum, ut videtur (p. 189.3 sq. R.). Sed opiniones antiquis iam temporibus conceptae quantum valuerint ad Homerum interpretandum et quomodo variatae sint, docet etiam Anonymus 蟺蔚蟻峤� 蟽蠂畏渭维蟿蠅谓 rhet. gr. III p. 152.12 sq. Sp., quocum consentiunt Excerpta Syriani ex codice Monacensi apud Spengelium Art. Scr. p. 119 adn. Ceterum cf. Schrader, Hermae 37.530 sq. Hinc factum est, ut ii, qui de actione scriberent, heroibus 胃伪蠀渭慰蟽蟿峤次� tribuerent etiam 峤懴�蠈魏蟻喂蟽喂谓 (Philod. rhet. I p. 200.21).

 

8. Schol. Hom. Townl. Il. I 443: 慰峒� 蟺蔚蟻峤� 螝蠈蟻伪魏伪 未峤� 魏伪峤� 韦喂蟽委伪谓 峤曄兿勎迪佄课� (i. e. post Phoenicem Homericum) 峒愇疚滴合屜兾嘉废兾蔽� 伪峤愊勎�谓 (sc. 蟿峤次� 峥ノ废勎肯佄刮何�谓).

            2 韦喂蟽委伪谓 corr. Bekk.: 螝蟿畏蟽委伪谓.

 

IV. HOMERUS RHETORICAE INVENTOR

 

            1. Philod. rhet. fr. XXI (II p. 111 Sudh.): 峒�位位始 慰峤曄勏壪� 峒�蟽蠉谓蔚蟿慰委 蟿喂谓苇蟼 峒愊兾嘉滴�, 峤ハ兿勎� 蠁喂位慰蟽慰蠁委伪蟼 渭峤参� 伪峤愊勧礁谓 蔚峤懴佄迪勧酱谓 位蔚纬蠈渭蔚谓慰谓 峒�魏慰蠉蔚喂谓, 慰峤愊囄� 蟿蔚 蟿峥段� 魏蟻喂蟿喂魏峥段� 渭蠈谓慰谓 峒�位位峤� 魏伪峤� 蟿峥段� 蠁喂位慰蟽蠈蠁蠅谓 伪峤愊勧慷谓, 慰峤愇瘁讲 渭喂峋断� 渭蠈谓慰谓 伪峒毕佄�蟽蔚蠅蟼 峒�位位峤� 蟺伪蟽峥段铰� 蟿峤� 未峤� 峥ノ废勎肯佄刮横繂蟼 蔚峤懴乕蔚蟿峤次� 谓慰渭委]味蔚蟽胃伪喂 蟿苇蟻伪蟼 [峤懴�慰位伪渭尾维谓蔚喂谓].

            Cf. etiam Sudh. Philod. Suppl. p. XX围III et ad rem Strabonis A 2, 3 (C. 16), Plut. de vita et poesi Homeri 92 sq., Quintiliani Inst. 12.11.21, Dionysii Hal. ep. ad Pompeium II 225.16. Peculiaris haec Stoicorum fuit sententia (Striller, De Stoicorum studiis rhetoricis, Bresl. philol. Abh. I.2 p. 11, Brozoska, De canone decem oratorum quaestiones, Breslau 1883 p. 59) vix tamen ab his primis prolata. Respicias velim, quae Antisthenes de 蟺慰位蠉蟿蟻慰蟺慰蟼 vocabuli Homerici sensu rhetorico docuit (B XIX 10).

 

            2. Quint. Inst. 10.1.46: igitur, ut Aratus ab Iove incipiendum putat, ita nos rite coepturi ab Homero videmur. hic enim, quem ad modum ex Oceano dicit ipse amnium fontiumque cursus initium capere, omnibus eloquentiae partibus exemplum et ortum dedit. hunc nemo in magnis rebus sublimitate, in parvis proprietate superaverit. idem laetus ac pressus, iucundus et gravis, tum copia tum brevitate mirabilis, nec poetica modo, sed oratoria virtute eminentissimus. nam ut de laudibus, exhortationibus, consolationibus taceam, nonne vel nonus liber, quo missa ad Achillem legatio continetur, vel in primo inter duces illa contentio vel dictae in secundo sententiae omnis litium ac consiliorum explicant artes? adfectus quidem vel illos mites vel hos concitatos nemo erit tam indoctus, qui non in sua potestate hunc auctorem habuisse fateatur. age vero, non utriusque operis sui ingressu in paucissimis versibus legem prohoemiorum non dico servavit sed constituit? nam et benevolum auditorem invocatione dearum, quas praesidere vatibus creditum est, et intentum proposita rerum magnitudine et docilem summa celeriter comprensa facit. narrare vero quis brevius quam qui mortem nuntiat Patrocli, quis significantius potest quam qui Curetum Aetolorumque proelium exponit? iam similitudines, amplificationes, exempla, digressus, signa rerum et argumenta cetera quaeque probandi ac refutandi sunt ita multa, ut etiam qui de artibus scripserunt plurima earum rerum testimonia ab 25 hoc poeta petant. nam epilogus quidem quis umquam poterit illis rogantis Achillen Priami precibus aequari? quid? in verbis, sententiis, figuris, dispositione totius operis nonne humani ingenii modum excedit?

            6 superavit al. ll.           9 consolationibusque dett.        nonus P: unus rell.  15 sui om. EPW        ingressus          16 et om. GH  26 Priami rogantis Ach. G H.

 

            Breviter Quintilianus haec comprehendit inst. 2.17.8: Nos porr慰, quando coeperit huius rei doctrina, non laboramus exquirere, quamquam apud Homerum et praeceptorem Phoenicem cum agendi tum etiam loquendi et oratores plures et omne in tribus ducibus orationis genus et certamina quoque proposita eloquentiae inter iuvenes invenimus, quin in caelatura clipei Achillis et lites sunt et actores. - Praeivisse Graecum auctorem eumque antiquum, comparatus docet Dionysius de comp. 24 p. 121.2 sq. Us. Rad.

 

            3. [Plut.] de vita et poesi Homeri 74: 峒愊�蔚峤� 未峤� 蟺伪谓蟿峤赶� 蟿慰峥� 峒�蟽魏慰蠀渭苇谓慰蠀 蟺伪蟻始峒�谓胃蟻蠋蟺慰喂蟼 位蠈纬慰蠀 峤� 渭苇谓 蟿委蟼 峒愊兿勎刮� 峒毕兿勎肯佄刮合屜�, 峤� 未峤� 胃蔚蠅蟻畏蟿喂魏蠈蟼, 峤� 未峤� 蟺慰位喂蟿喂魏蠈蟼, 蠁苇蟻蔚 胃蔚伪蟽蠋渭蔚胃伪, 蔚峒� 魏伪峤� 蟿慰蠉蟿蠅谓 蔚峒跋冡蕉谓 伪峒� 峒�蟻蠂伪峤� 蟺伪蟻始 伪峤愊勧糠. Ibid. 161: 峤� 未峤� 蟺慰位喂蟿喂魏峤赶� 位蠈纬慰蟼 峒斚兿勎刮� 峒愇� 蟿峥� 峥ノ废勎肯佄刮横繃 蟿苇蠂谓畏, 峒�蟼 峒愇较勧礁蟼 峤嵨嘉废佄肯� 蟺蟻峥断勎肯� 纬苇纬慰谓蔚谓, 峤∠� 蠁伪委谓蟿伪喂. 蔚峒� 纬峤跋� 峒斚兿勎刮� 峒� 峥ノ废勎肯佄刮横酱 未蠉谓伪渭喂蟼 蟿慰峥� 蟺喂胃伪谓峥断� 位苇纬蔚喂谓, 蟿委蟼 渭峋段晃晃课� 峤嵨嘉�蟻慰蠀 峒愇� 蟿峥� 未蠀谓维渭蔚喂 蟿伪蠉蟿峥� 魏伪胃苇蟽蟿畏魏蔚谓;

            In sequentibus agit de oeconomia, de prohoemiis, de variis orationis generibus, in multis congruens cum Quintiliano. Cf. cap. 162 et Quint. 10.1.50; 163 et Quint. 10.1.48; 169 et Quint. 10.1.47; 174 (74) et Quint. 10.1.49.

 

 4. Eustathius ad Od. 1379. 60: 峤� 蟺维蟽畏蟼 蟿峥喯� 峒愇� 位蠈纬慰喂蟼 蟿苇蠂谓畏蟼 魏伪胃畏纬畏蟿萎蟼, 峒愇� 慰峤� 慰峒肺� 蟿喂谓慰蟼 峤犖何滴蔽轿酷喀 蟺维谓蟿蔚蟼 蟺慰蟿伪渭慰峤� 魏伪峤� 蟺峋断兾蔽� 位慰纬喂魏峥段� 渭蔚胃蠈未蠅谓 蟺畏纬伪委.

            Cf. supra ad A IV 2 (Dion纬sii de c慰mp. p. 121.7), Pseudodionsii p. 310.24, p. 324.6 Us.

 

V. INITIA VERA

 

            1. Diog. Laert. 8.57: 峒埾佄瓜兿勎肯勎�位畏蟼 未峤� 峒愇� 蟿峥� 危慰蠁喂蟽蟿峥� (fr. 65) 蠁畏蟽喂 蟺蟻峥断勎课� 峒樜枷�蔚未慰魏位苇伪 峥ノ废勎肯佄刮横酱谓 蔚峤懴佄滇繓谓, 螙萎谓蠅谓伪 未峤� 未喂伪位蔚魏蟿喂魏萎谓. Cf. ibid. 9.25.

 

            2. Sextus adv. math. 7.6: 峒樜枷�蔚未慰魏位苇伪 渭峤参� 纬峤跋� 峤� 峒埾佄瓜兿勎肯勎�位畏蟼 蠁畏蟽峤� 蟺蟻峥断勎课� 峥ノ废勎肯佄刮横酱谓 魏蔚魏喂谓畏魏苇谓伪喂.

 

            3. Diog. Laert. 8.58: 蠁畏蟽峤� 未峤� 危维蟿蠀蟻慰蟼 峒愇� 蟿慰峥栂� 尾委慰喂蟼 (frg. 12, FHG. 3.162), 峤呄勎� 魏伪峤� 峒拔毕勏佱礁蟼 峒ξ� 魏伪峤� 峥ノ�蟿蠅蟻 峒�蟻喂蟽蟿慰蟼. 螕慰蟻纬委伪谓 纬慰峥ξ� 蟿峤肝� 螞蔚慰谓蟿峥栁轿课� 伪峤愊勎酷喀 纬蔚谓苇蟽胃伪喂 渭伪胃畏蟿萎谓, 峒勎轿聪佄� 峤懴�蔚蟻苇蠂慰谓蟿伪 峒愇� 峥ノ废勎肯佄刮横繃 魏伪峤� 蟿苇蠂谓畏谓 峒�蟺慰位蔚位慰喂蟺蠈蟿伪.

 Cf. Olympiodorus in Plat. 骋慰谤驳. p. 112 J., 6.16. 23 N.

 

            4. Quint. 3.1.8: nam primus post eos quos poetae tradiderunt movisse aliqua circa rhetoricen Empedocles dicitur. artium autem scriptores antiquissimi Corax et Tisias Siculi, quos insecutus est vir eiusdem insulae Gorgias Leontinus, Empedoclis, ut traditur, discipulus - v. infra fr. 10.

 

            5. Schol. Iamblichi V. P. p. 198 N. p. 150.10 D.: 峒愇� 螤蠀胃伪纬蠈蟻慰蠀 峒は佄疚毕勎� 峒� 未喂伪位蔚魏蟿喂魏萎, 峤∠兾毕嵪勏壪� 未苇 峒� 峥ノ废勎肯佄刮何�路 韦喂蟽委伪蟼 纬峤跋� 魏伪峤� 螕慰蟻纬委伪蟼 魏伪峤� 螤峥段晃肯� 峒樜枷�蔚未慰魏位苇慰蠀蟼 蟿慰峥� 螤蠀胃伪纬慰蟻蔚委慰蠀 渭伪胃畏蟿伪委.

 

            6. Aristot. Soph. el. 33 183b29: 慰峒� 未峤� 谓峥ξ� 蔚峤愇次课何刮嘉酷喀谓蟿蔚蟼 蟺伪蟻伪位伪尾蠈谓蟿蔚蟼 蟺伪蟻峤� 蟺慰位位峥段� 慰峒肺课� 峒愇� 未喂伪未慰蠂峥喯� 魏伪蟿峤� 渭苇蟻慰蟼 蟺蟻慰伪纬伪纬蠈谓蟿蠅谓 慰峤曄勏壪� 畏峤愇疚�魏伪蟽喂, 韦蔚喂蟽委伪蟼 渭峤参� 渭蔚蟿峤� 蟿慰峥ο� 蟺蟻蠋蟿慰蠀蟼, 螛蟻伪蟽蠉渭伪蠂慰蟼 未峤� 渭蔚蟿峤� 螕蔚喂蟽委伪谓, 螛蔚蠈未蠅蟻慰蟼 未峤� 渭蔚蟿峤� 蟿慰峥ο勎课� 魏伪峤� 蟺慰位位慰峤� 蟺慰位位峤� 蟽蠀谓蔚谓畏谓蠈蠂伪蟽喂 渭苇蟻畏, 未喂蠈蟺蔚蟻 慰峤愇瘁讲谓 胃伪蠀渭伪蟽蟿峤肝� 峒斚囄滴刮� 蟿喂 蟺位峥單肝肯� 蟿峤次� 蟿苇蠂谓畏谓... (36) 魏伪峤� 纬峤跋� 蟿峥段� 蟺蔚蟻峤� 蟿慰峤合� 峒愊佄瓜兿勎刮何酷胶蟼 位蠈纬慰蠀蟼 渭喂蟽胃伪蟻谓慰蠉谓蟿蠅谓 峤佄嘉课�伪 蟿喂蟼 峒ξ� 峒� 蟺伪委未蔚蠀蟽喂蟼 蟿峥� 螕慰蟻纬委慰蠀 蟺蟻伪纬渭伪蟿蔚委峋�. 位蠈纬慰蠀蟼 纬峤跋� 慰峒� 渭峤参� 峥ノ废勎肯佄刮何肯嵪�, 慰峒� 未峤� 峒愊佅壪勎废勎刮何酷喀蟼 峒愇次�未慰蟽伪谓 峒愇何嘉蔽轿肝�谓蔚喂谓, 蔚峒跋� 慰峤撓� 蟺位蔚喂蟽蟿维魏喂蟼 峒愇枷�委蟺蟿蔚喂谓 峋犖�胃畏蟽伪谓 峒懳何�蟿蔚蟻慰喂 蟿慰峥ο� 峒�位位萎位蠅谓 位蠈纬慰蠀蟼. 未喂蠈蟺蔚蟻 蟿伪蠂蔚峥栁� 渭苇谓, 峒勏勎迪囄轿肯� 未始 峒ξ� 峒� 未喂未伪蟽魏伪位委伪 蟿慰峥栂� 渭伪谓胃维谓慰蠀蟽喂 蟺伪蟻始 伪峤愊勧慷谓. 慰峤� 纬峤跋� 蟿苇蠂谓畏谓, 峒�位位峤� 蟿峤� 峒�蟺峤� 蟿峥喯� 蟿苇蠂谓畏蟼 未喂未蠈谓蟿蔚蟼 蟺伪喂未蔚蠉蔚喂谓 峤懴�蔚位维渭尾伪谓慰谓, 峤ハ兿�蔚蟻 峒偽� 蔚峒� 蟿喂蟼 峒愊�喂蟽蟿萎渭畏谓 蠁维蟽魏蠅谓 蟺伪蟻伪未蠋蟽蔚喂谓 峒愊�峤� 蟿峤� 渭畏未苇谓 蟺慰谓蔚峥栁� 蟿慰峤合� 蟺蠈未伪蟼, 蔚峒断勎� 蟽魏蠀蟿慰蟿慰渭喂魏峤次� 渭峤参� 渭峤� 未喂未维蟽魏慰喂, 渭畏未始 峤呂肝滴� 未蠀谓萎蟽蔚蟿伪喂 蟺慰蟻委味蔚蟽胃伪喂 蟿峤� 蟿慰喂伪峥ο勎�, 未慰委畏 未峤� 蟺慰位位峤� 纬苇谓畏 蟺伪谓蟿慰未伪蟺峥段� 峤懴�慰未畏渭维蟿蠅谓. 慰峤椣勎肯� 纬峤跋� 尾蔚尾慰萎胃畏魏蔚 渭峤参� 蟺蟻峤赶� 蟿峤次� 蠂蟻蔚委伪谓, 蟿苇蠂谓畏谓 未始 慰峤� 蟺伪蟻苇未蠅魏蔚谓. 魏伪峤� 蟺蔚蟻峤� 渭峤参� 蟿峥段� 峥ノ废勎肯佄刮横慷谓 峤懴�峥喯佅囄� 蟺慰位位峤� 魏伪峤� 蟺伪位伪喂峤� 蟿峤� 位蔚纬蠈渭蔚谓伪, 蟺蔚蟻峤� 未峤� 蟿慰峥� 蟽蠀位位慰纬委味蔚蟽胃伪喂 蟺伪谓蟿蔚位峥断� 慰峤愇瘁讲谓 蔚峒聪囄课嘉滴� 蟺蟻蠈蟿蔚蟻慰谓 峒勎晃籵 位苇纬蔚喂谓.

 2 蟺伪蟻伪纬伪纬蠈谓蟿蠅谓 A       蟺蟻慰蟽蟿伪纬蠈谓蟿蠅谓 D             8 峒愊佅壪勎刮何酷胶蟼 D 11 峒�蟺峤� 蟿苇蠂谓畏蟼 D

            Cf. Plato Menex. 235D, Isocr. 13.12 sq. De verbis interpretandis P. Wendland, Quaestiones rhetoricae (Universitatis Gott. Progr. 1914), Susemihl, Neue Platonische Forschungen (Univers. Gryph. Progr. 1898) 4 sq., Kroll, RhM 66.168. Ceterum de sophistarum institutionis ratione Plato qu慰que agit Soph. 232C sq.

 

            7. Schol. in Isocr. 13.19: 魏伪峤� 蟿峤跋� 魏伪位慰蠀渭苇谓伪蟼 蟿苇蠂谓伪蟼 纬蟻维蠄伪喂 蟿慰位渭萎蟽伪谓蟿蔚蟼: T喂蟽委伪谓 魏伪峤� 螝蠈蟻伪魏伪 位苇纬蔚喂 蟿慰峤合� 危蠀蟻伪魏慰蟽委慰蠀蟼 螕慰蟻纬委伪谓銆埾勎点�壩何贬蕉 螛蟻伪蟽蠉渭伪蠂慰谓, 慰峒� 蟺蟻峥断勎课� 峥ノ废勎肯佄刮横桨蟼 蟿苇蠂谓伪蟼 峒斘诚佄毕埼蔽�.

 

            Philod. I p. 211, col. XXIX a 17 蟿峤跋� 峒愇何次滴次课嘉�谓伪蟼 峤懴�始 伪峤愊勧慷谓 (scil. 蟿峥段� 渭蔚纬维位蠅谓 蟽慰蠁喂蟽蟿峥段�) . . 蟿苇蠂谓伪蟼.

 

            8. Cicero inv. 2.2.6-7: ac veteres quidem scriptores artis usque a principe illo atque inventore Tisia repetitos unum in locum conduxit Aristoteles et nominatim cuiusque praecepta magna conquisita cura perspicue conscripsit atque enodatadiligenter exposuit ac tantum inventoribus ipsis suavitate et brevitate dicendi praestitit, ut nemo illorum praecepta ex ipsorum libris cognoscat, sed omnes qui, quod illi praecipiant, velint intellegere, ad hunc quasi ad quendam multo commodiorem explicatorem revertantur. atque hic quidem ipse et sese ipsum nobis et eos, qui ante se fuerant, in medio posuit, ut ceteros et se ipsum per se cognosceremus.

            Hunc Aristotelis librum 鈥渋n quo exposuit dicendi artes omnium superiorum鈥� legisse se adfirmat Antonius apud Cic. de orat. 2.38.160. 峒愊�喂蟿慰渭峤� 蟿峥段� 峥ノ废勏屜佅壩� vocatur a Diog. Laert. 2.104 (v. infra s. n. 螛蔚蠈未蠅蟻慰蟼). 蟽慰蠁喂蟽蟿喂魏峤跋� 蟿蔚蠂谓慰位慰纬委伪蟼 inde memorare videtur Philod. rhet. II p. 110, fr. XIX 8 sq.

 

            9. Cic. Brut. 12.46-48: itaque ait Aristoteles, cum sublatis in Sicilia tyrannis res privatae longo intervallo iudiciis repeterentur, tum primum, quod esset acuta illa gens et controversa natura, artem et praecepta Siculos Coracem et Tisiam conscripsisse: nam antea neminem solitum via nec arte, sed accurate tamen et discripte plerosque dicere, scriptasque fuisse et paratas a Protagora rerum illustrium disputationes, quae nunc communes appellantur loci. quod idem fecisse Gorgiam, cum singularum rerum laudes vituperationesque conscripsisset, quod iudicaret, hoc oratoris esse maxume proprium, rem augere posse laudando vituperandoque rursus adfligere. huic Antiphontem Rhamnusium similia quaedam habuisse conscripta, qu慰 neminem umquam melius ullam oravisse capitis causam, cum se ipse defenderet, se audiente, locuples auctor scripsit Thucydides. nam Lysiam primo profiteri solitum artem esse dicendi, deinde, quod Theodorus esset in arte subtilior, in orationibus autem ieiunior, orationes eum scribere aliis coepisse, artem removisse. similiter Isocratem primo artem dicendi esse negavisse, scribere autem aliis solitum orationes, quibus in iudiciis uterentur, sed cum ex eo, quia quasi committeret contra legem qua <vetabatur, ne> quis iudicio circumveniretur, saepe ipse in iudicium vocaretur, orationes aliis destitisse scribere totumque se ad artes componendas transtulisse.

            3 controversia  6 de scripto (quod F. Blass tuetur Att. Ber. I² 27 鈥榥ach einem schriftlichen Konzept鈥�)                    21 quo

 

            10. Quint. Inst. 3.1.8-13: nam primus post e慰s, qu慰s poetae tradiderunt, movisse aliqua circa rhetoricen Empedocles dicitur, artium autem scriptores antiquissimi Corax et Tisias Siculi, quos insecutus est vir eiusdem insulae Gorgias Leontinus, Empedoclis, ut traditur, discipulus.

            is beneficio longissimae aetatis (nam centum et novem vixit annos) cum multis simul floruit, ideoque et illorum, de quibus supra dixi, fuit aemulus et ultra Socraten usque duravit. Thrasymachus Chalcedonius cum hoc et Prodicus Cius et Abderites Protagoras, a quo decem milibus denariorum didicisse artem, quam edidit, Euathlus dicitur, et Hippias Elius, et quem Palameden Plato appellat, Alcidamas Elaites. Antiphon qu慰que, <qui> et orationem primus omnium scripsit et nihilominus artem et ipse composuit et pro se dixisse optime est creditus. etiam Polycrates 鈥� et Theodorus Byzantius 鈥� horum primi communis locos tractasse dicuntur Protagoras, Gorgias, adfectus Prodicus, Hippias et idem Protagoras et Thrasymachus 鈥� (13) his successere multi, sed clarissimus Gorgiae auditor Isocrates (quamquam de praeceptore eius inter auctores non convenit, nos tamen Aristoteli credimus).

            12 et artem ipse A        15 adfectus om. BP      16 Prodicus Hippias et idem Protagoras Trasimacus A     Prodicus et Thrasymachus BP: 肠慰谤谤. a b 17 auditor Ambrosianus III Laurentianus: auditorum ABP 19 tamen A: autem BP

            Vide praeterea, quae de singulis auctoribus infra adnotata exstant. Cave autem, ne puram Aristotelis putes hanc traditionem.

 

            11. Cic. Brut. 8.30: ut intellectum est, quantam vim haberet accurata et facta quodam modo oratio, tum etiam magistri dicendi multi subito exstiterunt. tum Leontinus Gorgias, Thrasymachus Calchedonius, Protagoras Abderites, Prodicus Cius, Hippias Elius in honore magno fuit aliique multi temp慰ribus eisdem docere se profitebantur, arrogantibus sane verbis, quem ad modum causa inferior 鈥� ita enim loquebantur 鈥� dicendo fieri superior posset 鈥� (32) exstitit igitur iam senibus illis, quos paulo ante diximus, Isocrates, cuius domus cunctae Graeciae quasi ludus quidam patuit atque officina dicendi, magnus orator et perfectus magister, quamquam forensi luce caruit intraque parietes aluit eam gloriam, quam nemo meo quidem iudicio est postea consecutus. is et ipse scripsit multa praeclare et docuit alios.

 

            12. Plato Apol. Socr. 19E: 魏伪峤� 蟿慰峥ο勏� 纬苇 渭慰喂 未慰魏蔚峥� 魏伪位峤肝� 蔚峒段轿蔽�, 蔚峒� 蟿喂蟼 慰峒废屜� 蟿始 蔚峒滴� 蟺伪喂未蔚蠉蔚喂谓 峒�谓胃蟻蠋蟺慰蠀蟼 峤ハ兿�蔚蟻 螕慰蟻纬委伪蟼 蟿蔚 峤� 螞蔚慰谓蟿峥栁轿肯� 魏伪峤� f螤蟻蠈未喂魏慰蟼 峤� 螝蔚峥栁肯� 魏伪峤� 峒赶�蟺委伪蟼 峤� 螠位蔚峥栁肯�. 蟿慰蠉蟿蠅谓 纬峤跋� 峒曃何毕兿勎肯�, 峤� 峒勎轿聪佄迪�, 慰峒废屜� 蟿始 峒愊兿勧蕉谓 峒搬慷谓 蔚峒跋� 峒懳何�蟽蟿畏谓 蟿峥段� 蟺蠈位蔚蠅谓 蟿慰峥ο� 谓苇慰蠀蟼, 慰峒废� 峒斘疚迪兿勎� 蟿峥段� 峒懳毕呄勧慷谓 蟺慰位喂蟿峥段� 蟺蟻慰峥栁何� 尉蠀谓蔚峥栁轿蔽�, 峋� 峒偽� 尾慰蠉位蠅谓蟿伪喂, 蟿慰蠉蟿慰蠀蟼 蟺蔚委胃慰蠀蟽喂 蟿峤跋� 峒愇何滴�谓蠅谓 尉蠀谓慰蠀蟽委伪蟼 峒�蟺慰位喂蟺蠈谓蟿伪蟼 蟽蠁委蟽喂 尉蠀谓蔚峥栁轿蔽� 蠂蟻萎渭伪蟿伪 未喂未蠈谓蟿伪蟼 魏伪峤� 蠂维蟻喂谓 蟺蟻峤赶� 蔚峒拔次�谓伪喂. 峒愊�蔚峤� 魏伪峤� 峒勎晃晃肯� 峒�谓萎蟻 峒愊兿勎� 螤维蟻喂慰蟼 峒愇轿肝�未蔚 蟽慰蠁蠈蟼, 峤兾� 峒愇翅郊 峒∠兾赶屛嘉肺� 峒愊�喂未畏渭慰峥ξ较勎� 鈥� (20B) 蟿委蟼, 峒ξ� 未始 峒愇诚�, 魏伪峤� 蟺慰未伪蟺峤赶� 魏伪峤� 蟺蠈蟽慰蠀 未喂未维蟽魏蔚喂; 螘峤斘肺轿肯�, 峒斚單�, 峤� 危蠋魏蟻伪蟿蔚蟼, 螤维蟻喂慰蟼, 蟺苇谓蟿蔚 渭谓峥段�.

 

            13. Dionys. Hal. ad Amm. I p.258.17 U. R.: 蟿慰峥ο勎� 未峤� (i. e. Aristotelis confutationem) 蟺蔚蟺慰委畏魏伪, 尾苇位蟿喂蟽蟿蔚 峒埼嘉嘉贬繓蔚, 蟿峥喯� 蟿蔚 峒�位畏胃蔚委伪蟼 蟺蟻慰谓慰慰蠉渭蔚谓慰蟼, 峒Ｎ� 峒愊�峤� 蟺伪谓蟿峤赶� 慰峒次课嘉蔽� 未蔚峥栁� 蟺蟻维纬渭伪蟿慰蟼 峒愇疚迪勎�味蔚蟽胃伪喂, 魏伪峤� 蟿峥喯� 峒�蟺维谓蟿蠅谓 蟿峥段� 蟺蔚蟻峤� 蟿慰峤合� 蟺慰位喂蟿喂魏慰峥ο� 位蠈纬慰蠀蟼 峒愊兿�慰蠀未伪魏蠈蟿蠅谓 蠂维蟻喂蟿慰蟼, 峒滴轿� 渭峤� 蟿慰峥ξ甘� 峤懴�慰位维尾蠅蟽喂谓, 峤呄勎� 蟺维谓蟿伪 蟺蔚蟻喂蔚委位畏蠁蔚谓 峒� 螤蔚蟻喂蟺伪蟿畏蟿喂魏峤� 蠁喂位慰蟽慰蠁委伪 蟿峤� 峥ノ废勎肯佄刮横桨 蟺伪蟻伪纬纬苇位渭伪蟿伪 魏伪峤� 慰峤斚勎� 慰峒� 蟺蔚蟻峤� 螛蔚蠈未蠅蟻慰谓 魏伪峤� 螛蟻伪蟽蠉渭伪蠂慰谓 魏伪峤� 峒埼较勎瓜嗎慷谓蟿伪 蟽蟺慰蠀未峥喯� 峒勎疚刮课� 慰峤愇瘁讲谓 蔚峤椣佄课� 慰峤斚勎� 峒赶兾课合佄�蟿畏蟼 魏伪峤� 峒埼轿蔽疚刮嘉�谓畏蟼 魏伪峤� 峒埼晃何刮次�渭伪蟼 慰峤斚勎� 慰峒� 蟿慰蠉蟿慰喂蟼 蟽蠀渭尾喂蠋蟽伪谓蟿蔚蟼 蟿慰峥栂� 峒�谓未蟻维蟽喂 蟺伪蟻伪纬纬蔚位渭维蟿蠅谓 蟿蔚蠂谓喂魏峥段� 蟽蠀纬纬蟻伪蠁蔚峥栂� 魏伪峤� 峒�纬蠅谓喂蟽蟿伪峤� 位蠈纬蠅谓 峥ノ废勎肯佄刮横慷谓, 慰峒� 蟺蔚蟻峤� 螛蔚慰未苇魏蟿畏谓 魏伪峤� 桅委位喂蟽魏慰谓 魏伪峤� 峒赶兾贬繓慰谓 魏伪峤� 螝畏蠁喂蟽蠈未蠅蟻慰谓, 峥�蟺蔚蟻蔚委未畏谓 蟿蔚 魏伪峤� 螞蠀魏慰峥ο佄澄课� 魏伪峤� 螒峒跋兿囄�谓畏谓, 慰峤愇词� 銆堘紕谓銆� 伪峤愊勧礁蟼 峤� 螖畏渭慰蟽胃苇谓畏蟼 ... 蟿慰蟽慰峥ο勎肯� 峒愇澄�谓蔚蟿慰 蟿慰峥栂� 峒赶兾课合佄�蟿慰蠀蟼 蟿蔚 魏伪峤� 峒赶兾蔽�慰蠀 魏慰蟽渭慰蠉渭蔚谓慰蟼 蟺伪蟻伪纬纬苇位渭伪蟽喂谓, 蔚峒� 渭峤� 蟿峤跋� 峒埾佄瓜兿勎肯勎�位慰蠀蟼 蟿苇蠂谓伪蟼 峒愇疚�渭伪胃蔚谓.

            11 桅委位喂蟽蟿慰谓                  12 慰峤愇词� 峒偽�: 慰峤斚勎�

 

            14. Diog. Laert. 9.8.54 (de Protag慰ra): 蟺蟻峥断勎课� 未峤� 蟿峥段� 位蠈纬蠅谓 峒懳毕呄勎酷喀 峒�谓苇纬谓蠅 蟿峤肝� 蟺蔚蟻峤� 胃蔚峥段� ... 峒�谓苇纬谓蠅 未始 峒埼肝�谓畏蟽喂谓 峒愇� 蟿峥� 螘峤愊佄瓜�委未慰蠀 慰峒拔何�峋� 峒� 峤∠� 蟿喂谓峤蚕� 峒愇� 蟿峥� 螠蔚纬伪魏位蔚委未慰蠀. 峒勎晃晃课� 峒愇� 螞蠀魏蔚委峥�, 渭伪胃畏蟿慰峥� 蟿峤次� 蠁蠅谓峤次� 伪峤愊勧糠 蠂蟻萎蟽伪谓蟿慰蟼 峒埾佅囄蔽诚屜佄肯� 蟿慰峥� 螛蔚慰未蠈蟿慰蠀. 魏伪蟿畏纬蠈蟻畏蟽蔚 未始 伪峤愊勎酷喀 螤蠀胃蠈未蠅蟻慰蟼 螤慰位蠀味萎位慰蠀, 蔚峒废� 蟿峥段� 蟿蔚蟿蟻伪魏慰蟽委蠅谓. 峒埾佄瓜兿勎肯勎�位畏蟼 未始 E峤斘蔽肝幌屛� 蠁畏蟽喂谓.

            6 De Euathlo cf. sequentia.

 

            15. Diog. Laert. 9.8.56: 位苇纬蔚蟿伪喂 未苇 蟺慰蟿蔚 伪峤愊勧礁谓 峒�蟺伪喂蟿慰峥ξ较勎� 蟿峤肝� 渭喂蟽胃峤肝� 螘峤斘蔽肝晃课� 蟿峤肝� 渭伪胃畏蟿萎谓, 峒愇何滴�谓慰蠀 蔚峒跋�蠈谓蟿慰蟼路 峒�位位始 慰峤愇次�蟺蠅 谓蔚谓委魏畏魏伪<蟼>, 蔚峒跋�蔚峥栁铰� 峒�位位始 峒愇翅郊 渭峤参� 峒偽� 谓喂魏萎蟽蠅, 峤呄勎� 峒愇翅郊 峒愇轿�魏畏蟽伪, 位伪尾蔚峥栁� 渭蔚 峒斘次滴孤� 峒愥桨谓 未峤� 蟽蠉, 峤呄勎� 蟽蠉.

            Ex alio fonte esse sumpta neque eandem causam intellegi posse, quae supra indicatur (峒埾佄瓜兿勎肯勎�位畏蟼 未始 螘峤斘蔽肝幌屛� 蠁畏蟽喂谓) statuit Rabe P. S. XI. De Protagora Euathlum in ius vocante cf. Apul. flor. 18 p. 30 K, Gell. 5.10, Syriani in Hermogenem II p. 42.2 R, nec sane narratio ita dispersa saeculo demum p. C. secundo potest esse orta. 未委魏畏 峤懴�峤蚕� 渭喂蟽胃慰峥� inter Protagorae scripta memoratur a Diog. Laert. 9.55.

 

            16. Aristotelis, qui Coracem in privatis litibus apud iudices oravisse tradiderat, doctrinae vestigia conservantur, non pura quidem, apud Sopatrum in Hermogenis commentario VW V 6, 14: 蟿峥段� 纬峤跋� 蟿蠀蟻伪谓谓委未蠅谓 峒愇� 蟿伪峥栂� 蟺蠈位蔚蟽喂 纬蔚谓慰渭苇谓蠅谓 峒�谓伪纬魏伪委蠅蟼 峒� 峥ノ废勎肯佄刮横酱 蟺蟻峤赶� 峒愇晃迪呂肝迪佄�伪谓 蟽蟺慰蠀未维味慰蠀蟽伪 魏伪峤� 峒愇轿蔽较勎�伪 慰峤栂兾� 蟿伪峥栂� 蟿蠀蟻伪谓谓委蟽喂谓 峒斘澄何晃肺嘉� 蟿蔚 峒ξ� 魏伪峤� 峒愊�喂魏委谓未蠀谓慰谓 纬委谓蔚蟽胃伪喂. 峒愇� 未峤� 危喂魏蔚位委峋� 位苇纬蔚蟿伪喂 桅维位伪蟻喂谓 未畏渭伪纬蠅纬喂魏峤肝� 位蠈纬慰谓 蔚峒跋�蔚峥栁� 魏伪峤� 峤懴�伪纬伪纬苇蟽胃伪喂 蟿峤� 蟺位峥單肝肯� 蟺喂胃伪谓蠈蟿畏蟿喂, 峤ハ兿勎� 魏伪峤� 蔚峒跋� 蟿蠀蟻伪谓谓委未伪 峒愇晃肝滇繓谓路 渭蔚蟿峤� 未峤� 蟿伪峥ο勎� 螝蠈蟻伪尉 蟺蟻峥断勎课� 蟺维谓蟿蠅谓 蟽蠀谓蔚蟽蟿萎蟽伪蟿慰 未喂未伪蟽魏伪位委伪谓 蟺蔚蟻峤� 峥ノ废勎肯佄刮横繂蟼. 慰峒� 纬峤跋� 蟺蟻峤� 伪峤愊勎酷喀 峒愊�喂蟿畏未蔚蠉慰谓蟿蔚蟼 蟿峤次� 蟿苇蠂谓畏谓 峤∠� 峒愇枷�蔚喂蟻委峋� 蟿喂谓峤� 魏伪峤� 峒愊�喂渭蔚位蔚委峋� 蠂蟻蠋渭蔚谓慰喂 峒愊�蔚蟿萎未蔚蠀慰谓, 魏伪峤� 慰峤椣勎肯� <l. 慰峤曄勏壪�> 渭峤参� 慰峤� 渭蔚蟿峤� 位蠈纬慰蠀 魏伪峤� 伪峒跋勎�伪蟼 慰峤愇瘁讲 蟿苇蠂谓畏蟼 蟿喂谓蠈蟼. 蟿慰蠉蟿慰蠀 未峤� 蟿慰峥� 螝蠈蟻伪魏慰蟼 T喂蟽委伪蟼 纬苇纬慰谓蔚 渭伪胃畏蟿萎蟼, 蟺蔚蟻峤� 慰峤� 位苇纬蔚蟿伪喂 蟿慰喂慰峥ο勏屛� 蟿喂. T喂蟽委伪谓 蟽蠀谓胃苇蟽胃伪喂 蟿峥� 螝蠈蟻伪魏喂 蠂喂位委伪蟼 未蟻伪蠂渭维蟼, 峒∥轿�魏伪 峒偽� 峒愇� 未喂魏伪蟽蟿畏蟻委峥� 峒�纬蠅谓喂味蠈渭蔚谓慰蟼 蟿峤次� 蟺蟻蠋蟿畏谓 谓委魏畏谓 谓喂魏萎蟽蔚喂蔚谓, 峤勎较勎肯� 未苇 蟺蟻蔚蟽尾蠀蟿苇蟻慰蠀 蟿慰峥� 螝蠈蟻伪魏慰蟼 慰峤� 蟺蟻慰峥囄滴� 峒愇� 未喂魏伪蟽蟿畏蟻委峥� 峒愊�峤� 蟿峥� 蟿峥� 蟿蔚位蔚蠀蟿峥� 蟿慰峥� 螝蠈蟻伪魏慰蟼 魏蔚蟻未峋段轿蔽� 蟿峤跋� 峒愊�伪纬纬蔚位委伪蟼. 峒愇诚佄�蠄伪蟿慰 慰峤栁� 伪峤愊勧礁谓 峤� 螝蠈蟻伪尉 蠂蟻苇慰蟼 魏蟿位.

            Sequitur Coracis et Tisiae de mercede litis historiola, nota iam Sexto Empirico adv. math. II 96, extans eadem apud omnes Prolegomenon et Commentariorum scriptores, quam historiolam alii auctores (v. s.) de Protagora et Euathlo narraverant. Deinde pergit Sopater (p. 7.9):

            螙峥單晃肯� 慰峤栁� 蔚峒跋� 蟿慰蠉蟿慰蠀蟼 蟺慰位峤合� 蟿峥喯� 蟿苇蠂谓畏蟼 纬苇纬慰谓蔚, 魏伪峤� 螕慰蟻纬委伪蟼 峤� 螞蔚慰谓蟿峥栁轿肯� 魏伪蟿峤� 蟺蟻蔚蟽尾蔚委伪谓 峒愇晃羔郊谓 峒埼肝�谓畏蟽喂 蟿峤次� 蟿苇蠂谓畏谓 蟿峤次� 蟽蠀纬纬蟻伪蠁蔚峥栂兾蔽� 蟺伪蟻始伪峤愊勎酷喀 峒愇合屛嘉瓜兾滴� 魏伪峤� 伪峤愊勧礁蟼 峒懴勎�蟻伪谓 蟺蟻慰蟽苇胃畏魏蔚 魏伪峤� 渭蔚蟿始 伪峤愊勧礁谓 峒埼较勎瓜嗎慷谓 峤� 峥�伪渭谓慰蠉蟽喂慰蟼, 峤� 螛慰蠀魏蠀未委未慰蠀 未喂未维蟽魏伪位慰蟼, 位苇纬蔚蟿伪喂 蟿苇蠂谓畏谓 纬蟻维蠄伪喂, 渭蔚蟿峤� 蟿伪峥ο勎� 未峤� 峒赶兾课合佄�蟿畏蟼 峤� 峥ノ�蟿蠅蟻.

            Eandem Coracis, Gorgiae, Antiphontis, Isocratis successionem habes, quam Cicero l. l. exhibet. Neque ignorat Sopater (quod Aristoteles observaverat) antiquas illas artes ad genus iudiciale pertinuisse (ibid. p. 7.18 sq.), addens in fine (p. 7.31) 伪峤椣勎蔽� 渭苇谓蟿慰喂 伪峒� 未喂魏伪谓喂魏伪峤� 蟿苇蠂谓伪喂 慰峤愇次蔽嘉酷喀 蟽蠋味慰谓蟿伪喂. Vide ad rem excerpta quoque brevissima P. S. p. 60.2-7.

 

            Mixtam Aristotelis cum altera (v. i.) traditionem satis pueriliter quidem Troilus in Proleg慰menis W VI 48.26 sq. = P. S. 5 p. 52.3 sq. exhibet: 峥毼�蟻蠅谓 魏伪峤� 螕苇位蠅谓 危喂魏蔚位委伪蟼 纬蔚纬蠈谓伪蟽喂 蟿蠉蟻伪谓谓慰喂, 峒斚兿囄课� 未苇 蟿喂谓伪 螝蠈蟻伪魏伪 蟿峥� 峤�谓蠈渭伪蟿喂 蟺伪蟻伪未蠀谓伪蟽蟿蔚蠉慰谓蟿伪, 峤兿� 峒愊�慰委蔚喂 蟿峤次� 未喂慰委魏畏蟽喂谓 蟿峥段� 蟺慰位位峥段� 蟺伪蟻始 伪峤愊勎酷繓蟼. 渭蔚蟿伪蟺蔚蟽慰蠉蟽畏蟼 未峤� 蟿峥喯� 蟿蠀蟻伪谓谓委未慰蟼 蔚峒跋� 未畏渭慰魏蟻伪蟿委伪谓, 峒懴幭佄� 纬维蟻, 峤∠� 慰峤� 未蠉谓伪蟿伪喂 蟺蔚委胃蔚喂谓 峒勏�伪谓蟿伪 蟿峤肝� 未峥單嘉课� 魏伪胃维蟺蔚蟻 峒曃轿� 蟿峥段� 蟿蠀蟻维谓谓蠅谓, 峒愇嘉废囄蔽结径蟿慰 蟿峤� 蟺蟻慰慰委渭喂伪, 峒滴轿� 未喂始 伪峤愊勧慷谓 峒愊單滴晃合嵪兾废勎蔽� 蟿峤肝� 峒�魏蟻慰伪蟿峤次� 蟺蟻峤赶� 蔚峤斘轿课刮蔽�, 蔚峒断勎� 蟿峤次� 蟺蟻慰魏伪蟿伪蟽魏蔚蠀萎谓, 峒滴轿� 峒�谓苇位峥� 伪峒跋勎�伪谓 位蠀蟺慰峥ο兾蔽� 伪峤愊勏屛�, 蔚峒断勎� 蟿峤次� 蟺蟻慰魏伪蟿维蟽蟿伪蟽喂谓, 蔚峒跋兾参课会酱谓 魏伪峤� 峒�蟻蠂峤次� 魏伪峤� 蟺蟻慰慰委渭喂慰谓 慰峤栂兾蔽� 峒愊�峤� 蟿峤次� 魏伪蟿维蟽蟿伪蟽喂谓, 蟿峤次� 未峤� 魏伪蟿维蟽蟿伪蟽喂谓 蠄喂位峤次� 蟿峥段� 蟺蟻伪蠂胃苇谓蟿蠅谓 峒斘何肝迪兾刮�, 蟿慰峤合� 未峤� 峒�纬峥段轿毕� 峒�蟺蠈未蔚喂尉喂谓 魏伪峤� 蟺委蟽蟿喂谓 蟿峥段� 蠄喂位峥断� 未喂畏纬畏胃苇谓蟿蠅谓, 蔚峒断勎� 蟿峤次� 蟺伪蟻苇魏尾伪蟽喂谓 峒�蟺蠈未蔚喂尉喂谓 慰峤栂兾蔽� 蟿慰峥� 魏蟻喂谓慰渭苇谓慰蠀 尾委慰蠀. 峒愊兾合屜�蔚喂 纬维蟻, 峤∠�, <蔚峒�> 苇蟺峤� 峒懳结蕉 魏伪峤� 渭蠈谓峥� 峒愇澄何晃�渭伪蟿喂 蟺慰喂萎蟽伪蟽胃伪喂 蟿峤次� 魏伪蟿畏纬慰蟻委伪谓 <峒�蟻魏慰峥�>蟿慰, 峤� 蠁蔚蠉纬蠅谓 峒�蟺慰位蠀胃萎蟽蔚蟿伪喂, 魏伪峤� 未喂峤� 蟿慰峥ο勎� 蟿峤次� 蟺伪蟻苇魏尾伪蟽喂谓 峒愊�蔚谓蠈畏蟽蔚, 蟿慰峥ο� 未始 峒愊�喂位蠈纬慰蠀蟼 峒�谓伪魏蔚蠁伪位伪委蠅蟽喂谓 蟿峥段� 蔚峒跋佄肺嘉�谓蠅谓 未喂峤� 蟿慰峥�, 峤∠� 蟿峤� (蟿峤� 峤∠� ll.) 蔚峒拔合屜�, 蟿慰峤合� 未喂魏伪蟽蟿峤跋� 蟺慰位位峤� 峒�魏慰蠉蟽伪谓蟿伪蟼 蔚峒跋� 位萎胃畏谓 峒愇晃肝滇繓谓.  

            Sequitur de Coracis Tisiaeque lite historia, Gorgias eloquentiam Athenas transfert.         Troilo auctore septem Corax orationis partes distinxerat: 蟺蟻慰慰委渭喂慰谓, 蟺蟻慰魏伪蟿伪蟽魏蔚蠀萎谓, 蟺蟻慰魏伪蟿维蟽蟿伪蟽喂谓, 魏伪蟿维蟽蟿伪蟽喂谓, 峒�纬峥段轿毕�, 蟺伪蟻苇魏尾伪蟽喂谓, 峒愊�委位慰纬慰谓, eaeque partes ad solum quadrant iudiciale genus dicendi (de singulis rebus v. infra s. v. 螝蠈蟻伪尉).

 

            Altera autem est in Prolegomenis rhetoricis traditio, qua Corax orator in contionali genere versatus inducitur, id quod breviter Ioannes Doxapatri in commentario ad Aphthonii Pr慰gymnasmata exp慰nit W II 140 = P. S. p. 150.12 R. 峒斚兿勎� 未苇 魏伪峤� 峒�蠁始峒懴勎�蟻伪蟼 峒毕兿勎肯佄�伪蟼 未蔚峥栁疚蔽� 蟺蟻峥断勎课� 蟿峤� 蟽蠀渭尾慰蠀位蔚蠀蟿喂魏峤肝� 蟿峥段� 峒勎晃幌壩铰� 位苇纬蔚蟿伪喂 纬峤跋� 魏伪峤� 螝蠈蟻伪魏伪, 峤呄兿勎瓜� 蟿峤� 蟿峥喯� 峥ノ废勎肯佄刮横繂蟼 峒斚佄澄� 蔚峒跋� 蠁峥断� 蟺蟻慰萎纬伪纬蔚 蟿慰峥栂� 峒�谓胃蟻蠋蟺慰喂蟼, 蟿峥� 蟽蠀渭尾慰蠀位蔚蠀蟿喂魏峥� 蔚峒次次滴� 蠂蟻萎蟽伪蟽胃伪喂 蟺蟻蠋蟿峥�. De eadem re satis loquaciter Prolegomena artis rhetoricae an慰nyma W VI 11 = P. S. p. 24.8: 蔚峒跋兾滴次�尉伪谓蟿慰 蟿慰委谓蠀谓 蟺蟻峥断勎课� 峒佅�维谓蟿蠅谓 伪峒� 危蠀蟻维魏慰蠀蟽蟽伪喂, 蟺蠈位喂蟼 蟿峥喯� 危喂魏蔚位委伪蟼 (scil. 蟿峤次� 峥ノ废勎肯佄刮何�谓). . . . 伪峤曄勎� . . . 峤懴�峤� 螕苇位蠅谓慰蟼 魏伪峤� 峒刮�蟻蠅谓慰蟼, 蟿蠀蟻维谓谓蠅谓 峤犖嘉肯勎�蟿蠅谓, 峒愊勏呄佄蔽轿轿迪嵨肝� . . . (p. 25.3) 慰峤曄勏壪� 慰峤栁� 蠂伪位蔚蟺峥断� 魏伪峤� 胃畏蟻喂蠅未峥断� 峒�蟻蠂慰渭苇谓蠅谓 蟿峥段� 危蠀蟻伪魏慰蠀蟽蟽委蠅谓 魏伪峤� 蟺蟻慰蟽蔚蠀蠂慰渭苇谓蠅谓 螖喂峤� 峒愇晃迪呂肝迪佄�峥� 峒�蟺伪位位伪纬峥單轿蔽� 蟿峥喯� 蟺喂魏蟻峋断� 蟿伪蠉蟿畏蟼 未慰蠀位蔚委伪蟼, 螙蔚峤合� 蟽蠅蟿峤聪� 峒呂嘉� 魏伪峤� 峒愇晃迪呂肝�蟻喂慰蟼 . . . 峒犖晃迪呂肝�蟻蠅蟽蔚 蟿峥喯� 蟿蠀蟻伪谓谓委未慰蟼 蟿慰峤合� 危蠀蟻伪魏慰蠀蟽蟽委慰蠀蟼. 峤� 慰峤栁� 蟿峥段� 危蠀蟻伪魏慰蠀蟽蟽委蠅谓 未峥單嘉肯� . . . 蟿峤次� 未蔚蟽蟺慰蟿蔚委伪谓 峒斚囄滴刮� 峒佅�维谓蟿蠅谓 峒犖参肯呂晃�胃畏, 螝蠈蟻伪尉 未苇 蟿喂蟼 峤勎轿课嘉�, 危蠀蟻伪魏慰蠉蟽蟽喂慰蟼 蟿峤� 纬苇谓慰蟼, 蟽魏慰蟺萎蟽伪蟼, 峤∠� 峤� 未峥單嘉肯� 峒�蟽蟿维胃渭畏蟿慰谓 魏伪峤� 峒勏勎蔽合勎课� 蟺苇蠁蠀魏蔚 蟺蟻峋段澄嘉�, 魏伪峤� 峒愇轿轿课�蟽伪蟼, 峤呄勎� 位蠈纬慰蟼 峒愊兿勎�谓, 峋� 峥ハ呂肝嘉�味蔚蟿伪喂 峒�谓胃蟻蠋蟺慰蠀 蟿蟻蠈蟺慰蟼, 峒愊兾合屜�畏蟽蔚 未喂峤� 位蠈纬慰蠀 峒愊�峤� 蟿峤� 蟺蟻蠈蟽蠁慰蟻伪 蟿峤肝� 未峥單嘉课� 魏伪峤� 蟺蟻慰蟿蟻苇蟺蔚喂谓 魏伪峤� 峒�蟺慰蟿蟻苇蟺蔚喂谓. 蔚峒跋兾滴晃羔郊谓 慰峤栁� 峒愇� 蟿峥� 峒愇何何晃废兾�峋� . . . 峒は佄疚毕勎� 位蠈纬慰喂蟼 蟺蟻蠈蟿蔚蟻慰谓 胃蔚蟻伪蟺蔚蠀蟿喂魏慰峥栂� 魏伪峤� 魏慰位伪魏蔚蠀蟿喂魏慰峥栂� 蟿峤次� 峤勏囄晃废兾刮� 魏伪峤� 蟿峤� 胃慰蟻蠀尾峥段次迪� 魏伪蟿伪蟺蟻伪峥�谓伪喂 蟿慰峥� 未萎渭慰蠀, 峒呄勎刮轿� 魏伪峤� 蟺蟻慰慰委渭喂伪 峒愇何�位蔚蟽蔚, 渭蔚蟿峤� 未峤� 蟿峤� 魏伪蟿伪蟺蟻伪峥�谓伪喂 魏伪峤� 魏伪蟿伪蟽喂纬维蟽伪喂 蟿峤肝� 未峥單嘉课� 峒は佄疚毕勎�, 蟺蔚蟻峤� 峤�谓 峒斘次滴�, 蟽蠀渭尾慰蠀位蔚蠉蔚喂谓 蟿峥� 未萎渭峥� 魏伪峤� 位苇纬蔚喂谓 峤∠� 峒愇� 未喂畏纬萎蟽蔚喂 魏伪峤� 渭蔚蟿峤� 蟿伪峥ο勎� 峒�谓伪魏蔚蠁伪位伪喂慰峥ο兾肝蔽� 魏伪峤� 峒�谓伪渭喂渭谓峋愊兾何滴刮� 峒愇� 蟽蠀谓蟿蠈渭峥� 蟺蔚蟻峤� 蟿峥段� 蠁胃伪蟽维谓蟿蠅谓 魏伪峤� 蔚峒跋� 蟽蠉谓慰蟺蟿慰谓 魏伪峤� 峤懴�始 峤勏埼刮� 峒勎澄滴刮� 蟿峤� 位蔚蠂胃苇谓蟿伪 蟿峥� 未萎渭峥�. 魏伪峤� 蟿峤� 渭峤参� 蟺蟻峥断勎� 峒愇何�位蔚蟽蔚 蟺蟻慰慰委渭喂伪, 蟿峤� 未峤� 未蔚蠉蟿蔚蟻伪 峒愇何�位蔚蟽蔚谓 峒�纬峥段轿毕�, 蟿峤� 未峒� 蟿蟻委蟿伪 峒愇何�位蔚蟽蔚谓 峒愊�喂位蠈纬慰蠀蟼. Sequitur de Tisiae discipuli lite historia. Deinde pergitur (W p. 14 = P. S. p. 27.11 sq.): 蟿苇蟿伪蟻蟿蠈谓 峒愊兿勎� 魏蔚蠁维位伪喂慰谓, 蟺峥断� 峒愇� 峒埼肝�谓伪喂蟼 峒の何嘉毕兾滴� 峒� 峥ノ废勎肯佄刮何� . . . 螞蔚慰谓蟿委谓畏 蟺蠈位喂蟼 魏伪峤� 伪峤愊勧酱 蟿峥喯� 危喂魏蔚位委伪蟼. 蟿伪蠉蟿畏谓 峒�蟺峥次何瓜兾蔽� 蟺维位伪喂 峒埼肝肺轿贬繓慰喂. 蟺蠈位蔚渭慰谓 未峤� 峒愊兿囄肺合屜勎迪� 慰峒� 螞蔚慰谓蟿峥栁轿课� 蟺蟻峤赶� 蟿慰峥ο� 峒�蟽蟿蠀纬蔚委蟿慰谓伪蟼 蟺蟻蔚蟽尾蔚蠉慰谓蟿伪喂 蟺蟻峤赶� 峒埼肝肺轿蔽�慰蠀蟼 未喂峤� 螕慰蟻纬委慰蠀 蟿慰峥� 峥ノ�蟿慰蟻慰蟼 蟽蠀渭渭伪蠂委伪谓 伪峒跋勎酷喀谓蟿蔚蟼. 峤� 未峤� 螕慰蟻纬委伪蟼 峒愇晃羔郊谓 蔚峒跋� 蟿峤跋� 峒埼肝�谓伪蟼 峥ノ废勎肯佄迪嵨滴刮� 峒愊兿�慰蠉未伪蟽蔚 未喂始 峒Ｎ� 峒�蠁委魏蔚蟿o 蠂蟻蔚委伪谓, 魏伪峤� 蟿慰蟽慰峥ο勎课� 蟺蔚蟻喂峥單� 蟿峥� 峥ノ�蟿慰蟻喂 魏维位位慰蟼 蟺蔚蟻峤� 蟿峤次� 蠁蟻维蟽喂谓, 峤ハ兿勎� 蟺维蟽伪蟼 峒埼肝�谓伪蟼 魏喂谓峥喯兾蔽� 蟺蔚蟻峤� 蟿峤次� 峒�魏蟻蠈伪蟽喂谓 蟿峤次� 伪峤愊勎酷喀. 蟽蠀谓蔚蟻蠂蠈渭蔚谓慰喂 慰峤栁� 蟿峤跋� 渭峤参� 峒∥嘉�蟻伪蟼 蟿峥段� 峒愊�喂未蔚委尉蔚蠅谓 峒愇何�位慰蠀谓 峒懳肯佅勎�蟼, 蟿慰峤合� 未峤� 位蠈纬慰蠀蟼 峒愇何�位慰蠀谓 位伪渭蟺维未伪蟼.

            Similiter W III 610. W II 119 = P. S. p. 126 R. W 11 = P. S. p. 269. W II 683 = P. S. p. 60. W II 91 = P. S. p. 91. W VII 6 = P. S. p. 189. Hausit inde etiam Ioannes Sardianus p. 50.12-19 R. Ad Platonis Gorgiam adludere videntur (464 C) 位蠈纬慰喂 胃蔚蟻伪蟺蔚蠀蟿喂魏慰峤� 魏伪峤� 魏慰位伪魏蔚蠀蟿喂魏慰委, quorum memor est etiam Longinus in rhet. p. 190, 15 H. 蟺慰喂蔚峥栂兾肝蔽� 未峤� 蟿慰峥ο勎� 蠂蟻峤� 蟿慰峥栂� 胃蔚蟻伪蟺蔚蠀蟿喂魏慰峥栂� 蟿蔚 魏伪峤� 魏慰位伪魏蔚蠀蟿喂魏慰峥栂� 峤�谓蠈渭伪蟽喂.

            ln hac traditione, qua Corax orator in contionem prodierat, non septem, sed tres orationis partes 蟺蟻慰慰委渭喂伪, 峒�纬峥段轿迪�, 峒愊�委位慰纬慰喂 distinguntur, quod ipsum quoque ad rem admodum quadrat, quartum 未喂萎纬畏蟽喂蟼 interdum ex confusione rerum additur, quintum 蟺伪蟻苇魏尾伪蟽喂蟼.

            Ad rem cf. Diodori 11.87.5 de rebus Siculorum: 峒愊�蔚蟺蠈位伪味蔚 纬峤跋� 未畏渭伪纬蠅纬峥段� 蟺位峥單肝肯� 魏伪峤� 蟽蠀魏慰蠁伪谓蟿峥段�, 魏伪峤� 位蠈纬慰蠀 未蔚喂谓蠈蟿畏蟼 峤懴�峤� 蟿峥段� 谓蔚蠅蟿苇蟻蠅谓 峒犗兾何滇繓蟿慰. Vide A. Gercke, Hermae 32 (1897) 344 sq., P. Hamberger, Die rednerische Disposition in der alten 韦苇蠂谓畏 峥ノ废勎肯佄刮何� (Rhet. Studien 2, Paderborn 1914) 25 sq. Kowalski, De artis rhet. origg. quaestiones sel. 44 sq. De artibus rhetoricis e Sicilia in Graeciam translatis generaliter loquitur Iamblichus Vit. Pyth. 166.

 

            17. Theophrast. (Usener Kl. Schr. I 191): 峒樜� 蟿慰峥� 蟺苇蟺位慰蠀 螛蔚慰蠁蟻维蟽蟿慰蠀路 蟿苇蠂谓畏谓 位蠈纬蠅谓 螝蠈蟻伪尉 危蠀蟻伪魏慰蠉蟽喂慰蟼 蔚峤曄佄毕勎�.

            Cf. P. S. p. 126.5, p. 171.19, p. 150.13 R., Sudae lex. s. v. 螝蠈蟻伪尉.

 

            18. Cic. de orat. 1.20.91: neminem scriptorem artis ne mediocriter quidem disertum fuisse dicebat, cum repeteret usque a Corace nescioquo et Tisia, quos artis illius inventores et principes fuisse constaret.

 

            19. Quint. inst. 2.17.5: quidam naturalem esse rhetoricen volunt 鈥� (7) deinde adiciunt illas verborum cavillati慰nes, nihil, quod ex arte fiat, ante artem fuisse: atqui dixisse homines pro se et in alios semper: doctores artis sero et circa Tisian et Coraca primum repertos.

 

            20. Excerpta Cod. Par. 3032, P. S. p. 296.25: 韦喂蟽委伪蟼 魏伪峤� 螝蠈蟻伪尉, 慰峒迪勎刮轿迪� 峒愊單滇喀蟻慰谓 蟿峤次� 峥ノ废勎肯佄刮何�谓.

 

            21. Schol. Hom. Town. Il. I 443 v. supra A III 8.

 

            22. Sopatros W V 7.10: 螕慰蟻纬委伪蟼 峤� 螞蔚慰谓蟿峥栁轿肯� 魏伪蟿峤� 蟺蟻蔚蟽尾蔚委伪谓 峒愇晃羔郊谓 峒埼肝�谓畏蟽喂 蟿峤次� 蟿苇蠂谓畏谓 蟿峤次� 蟽蠀纬纬蟻伪蠁蔚峥栂兾蔽� 蟺伪蟻始 伪峤愊勎酷喀 (螝蠈蟻伪魏慰蟼 scil.) 峒愇合屛嘉瓜兾滴� 魏伪峤� 伪峤愊勧礁蟼 峒懴勎�蟻伪谓 蟺蟻慰蟽苇胃畏魏蔚 魏伪峤� 渭蔚蟿始 伪峤愊勧礁谓 峒埼较勎瓜嗎慷谓 峤� P伪渭谓慰蠉蟽喂慰蟼, 峤� 螛慰蠀魏蠀未委未慰蠀 未喂未维蟽魏伪位慰蟼, 位苇纬蔚蟿伪喂 蟿苇蠂谓畏谓 纬蟻维蠄伪喂, 渭蔚蟿峤� 蟿伪峥ο勎� 未峤� 峒赶兾课合佄�蟿畏蟼 峤� 峥ノ�蟿蠅蟻. 魏伪峤� 蟺峋断兾蔽� 渭峤参� 伪峤椣勎蔽� 未畏渭伪纬蠅纬喂魏伪峤� 蟿苇蠂谓伪喂 蔚峒跋兾�谓. quae secuntur, infra (A V 42) epressa exstant.

            Cf. Iamblichus, Vit. Pyth. 166.

 

            23. Paus. 6.17.8: 慰峤椣勎肯� 峤� 螕慰蟻纬委伪蟼 蟺伪蟿蟻峤赶� 渭峤参� 峒ξ� 围伪蟻渭伪谓蟿委未慰蠀, 位苇纬蔚蟿伪喂 未峤� 峒�谓伪蟽蠋蟽伪蟽胃伪喂 渭蔚位苇蟿畏谓 位蠈纬蠅谓 蟺蟻峥断勎肯�, 峒犖嘉滴晃肺嘉�谓畏谓 蟿蔚 峒愊� 峒呄�伪谓 魏伪峤� 峒愊� 位萎胃畏谓 峤�位委纬慰蠀 未蔚峥栁� 峒ノ何肯呄兾蔽� 峒�谓胃蟻蠋蟺慰喂蟼. 蔚峤愇次课何刮坚繂蟽伪喂 未峤� 螕慰蟻纬委伪谓 位蠈纬蠅谓 峒曃轿滴何� 峒斘� 蟿蔚 蟺伪谓畏纬蠉蟻蔚喂 蟿峥� 峤埼幌呂枷�喂魏峥� 蠁伪蟽喂 魏伪峤� 峒�蠁喂魏蠈渭蔚谓慰谓 魏伪蟿峤� 蟺蟻蔚蟽尾蔚委伪谓 峤佄嘉酷喀 韦喂蟽委峋� 蟺伪蟻始 峒埼肝肺轿蔽�慰蠀蟼.

 

            24. Diod. bibl. 12.53.1: 峒愊�峤� 未峤� 蟿慰蠉蟿蠅谓 魏伪蟿峤� 蟿峤次� 危喂魏蔚位委伪谓 螞蔚慰谓蟿峥栁轿课�, 围伪位魏喂未苇蠅谓 渭峤参� 峤勎较勎迪� 峒勏�慰喂魏慰喂, 蟽蠀纬纬蔚谓蔚峥栂� 未峤� 峒埼肝肺轿蔽�蠅谓, 峒斚勏呄囄课� 峤懴�峤� 危蠀蟻伪魏慰蟽委蠅谓 蟺慰位蔚渭慰蠉渭蔚谓慰喂. 蟺喂蔚味蠈渭蔚谓慰喂 未峤� 蟿峥� 蟺慰位苇渭峥� 魏伪峤� 未喂峤� 蟿峤次� 峤懴�蔚蟻慰蠂峤次� 蟿峥段� 危蠀蟻伪魏慰蟽委蠅谓 魏喂谓未蠀谓蔚蠉慰谓蟿蔚蟼 峒佄会慷谓伪喂 魏伪蟿峤� 魏蟻维蟿慰蟼, 峒愇疚�蟺蔚渭蠄伪谓 蟺蟻苇蟽尾蔚喂蟼 蔚峒跋� 蟿峤跋� 峒埼肝�谓伪蟼, 峒�尉喂慰峥ξ较勎迪� 蟿峤肝� 未峥單嘉课� 尾慰畏胃峥喯兾蔽� 蟿峤次� 蟿伪蠂委蟽蟿畏谓 魏伪峤� 蟿峤次� 蟺蠈位喂谓 峒懳毕呄勧慷谓 峒愇� 蟿峥段� 魏喂谓未蠉谓蠅谓 峥ハ嵪兾毕兾肝蔽孤� 峒ξ� 未峤� 蟿峥段� 峒�蟺蔚蟽蟿伪位渭苇谓蠅谓 峒�蟻蠂喂蟺蟻蔚蟽尾蔚蠀蟿峤聪� 螕慰蟻纬委伪蟼 峤� 峥ノ�蟿蠅蟻, 未蔚喂谓蠈蟿畏蟿喂 位蠈纬慰蠀 蟺慰位峤� 蟺蟻慰苇蠂蠅谓 蟺维谓蟿蠅谓 蟿峥段� 魏伪胃始 峒懳毕呄勏屛�. 慰峤椣勎肯� 魏伪峤� 蟿苇蠂谓伪蟼 峥ノ废勎肯佄刮横桨蟼 蟺蟻峥断勎肯� 峒愇疚滇喀蟻蔚 魏伪峤� 魏伪蟿峤� 蟿峤次� 蟽慰蠁喂蟽蟿蔚委伪谓  蟿慰蟽慰峥ο勎� 蟿慰峤合� 峒勎晃晃肯呄� 峤懴�蔚蟻苇尾伪位蔚谓, 峤ハ兿勎� 渭喂蟽胃峤肝� 位伪渭尾维谓蔚喂谓 蟺伪蟻峤� 蟿峥段� 渭伪胃畏蟿峥段� 渭谓峋断� 峒懳何毕勏屛�. 慰峤椣勎肯� 慰峤栁� 魏伪蟿伪谓蟿萎蟽伪蟼 蔚峒跋� 蟿峤跋� 峒埼肝�谓伪蟼 魏伪峤� 蟺伪蟻伪蠂胃蔚峤断� 蔚峒跋� 蟿峤肝� 未峥單嘉课� 未喂蔚位苇蠂胃畏 蟿慰峥栂� 峒埼肝肺轿蔽�慰喂蟼 蟺蔚蟻峤� 蟿峥喯� 蟽蠀渭渭伪蠂委伪蟼 魏伪峤� 蟿峥� 尉蔚谓委味慰谓蟿喂 蟿峥喯� 位苇尉蔚蠅蟼 峒愇疚�蟺位畏尉蔚 蟿慰峤合� 峒埼肝肺轿蔽�慰蠀蟼 峤勎较勎毕� 蔚峤愊喯呂滇繓蟼 魏伪峤� 蠁喂位慰位蠈纬慰蠀蟼. 蟺蟻峥断勎肯� 纬峤跋� 峒愊囅佄�蟽伪蟿慰 蟿慰峥栂� 蟿峥喯� 位苇尉蔚蠅蟼 蟽蠂畏渭伪蟿喂蟽渭慰峥栂� 蟺蔚蟻喂蟿蟿慰蟿苇蟻慰喂蟼 魏伪峤� 蟿峥� 蠁喂位慰蟿蔚蠂谓委峋� 未喂伪蠁苇蟻慰蠀蟽喂谓, 峒�谓蟿喂胃苇蟿慰喂蟼 魏伪峤� 峒跋兾课合幬晃课瓜� 魏伪峤� 蟺伪蟻委蟽慰喂蟼 魏伪峤� 峤佄嘉课刮肯勎滴晃迪嵪勎课瓜� 魏伪委 蟿喂蟽喂谓 峒懴勎�蟻慰喂蟼 蟿慰喂慰蠉蟿慰喂蟼, 峒� 蟿蠈蟿蔚 渭峤参� 未喂峤� 蟿峤� 尉苇谓慰谓 蟿峥喯� 魏伪蟿伪蟽魏蔚蠀峥喯� 峒�蟺慰未慰蠂峥喯� 峒犖疚刮酷喀蟿慰.

            16 峤佄嘉肯勎滴晃迪嵪勎课瓜� ll.

 

            25. Di慰nys. de Lysia I p. 11.3 U. R. (458 R.): 峒ハ埼毕勎� 未峤� 魏伪峤� 蟿峥段� 峒埼肝�谓畏蟽喂 峥ノ废勏屜佅壩� 峒� 蟺慰喂畏蟿喂魏萎 蟿蔚 魏伪峤� 蟿蟻慰蟺喂魏峤� 蠁蟻维蟽喂蟼, 峤∠� 渭峤参� 韦峒拔嘉蔽瓜屜� 蠁畏蟽喂, 螕慰蟻纬委慰蠀 峒勏佄疚蔽较勎肯�, 峒∥轿�魏始 峒埼肝�谓伪味蔚 蟺蟻蔚蟽尾蔚蠉蠅谓 魏伪蟿蔚蟺位萎尉伪蟿慰 蟿慰峤合� 峒�魏慰蠉慰谓蟿伪蟼 蟿峥� 未畏渭畏纬慰蟻委峋�.

            Notabis etiam commentaria, cum a Gorgia rhetoricen Athenas translatam esse contendant, nihil aliud testimonii causa proferre quam orationis in contione Atheniensium habitae verborum pulchritudinem. Minus recte autem R. (P. S. p. 27) Platonis Hippiae maioris 282B eiusdem rei gratia laudat, cum Plato nihil dicat, nisi Gorgiam sicut Prodicum et in contione optime dicere visum esse et sophisticas declamationes instituisse.

 

            26. Plato Hipp. mai. 281D: 峒喯伿� 慰峤栁� 蟺蟻峤赶� 螖喂蠈蟼, 峤ハ兿�蔚蟻 伪峒� 峒勎晃晃蔽� 蟿苇蠂谓伪喂 峒愊�喂未蔚未蠋魏伪蟽喂 魏伪委 蔚峒跋兾� 蟺伪蟻峤� 蟿慰峤合� 谓峥ξ� 未畏渭喂慰蠀蟻纬慰峤合� 慰峒� 蟺伪位伪喂慰峤� 蠁伪峥ξ晃课�, 慰峤曄勏� 魏伪峤� 蟿峤次� 峤懳嘉迪勎�蟻伪谓 蟿峤次� 蟿峥段� 蟽慰蠁喂蟽蟿峥段� 蟿苇蠂谓畏谓 峒愊�喂未蔚未蠅魏苇谓伪喂 蠁峥段嘉滴� 魏伪峤� 蔚峒段轿蔽� 蟿峥段� 峒�蟻蠂伪委蠅谓 蟿慰峤合� 蟺蔚蟻峤� 蟿峤次� 蟽慰蠁委伪谓 蠁伪蠉位慰蠀蟼 蟺蟻峤赶� 峤懳坚径蟼 蟺维谓蠀 渭峤参� 慰峤栁� 峤�蟻胃峥断� 位苇纬蔚喂蟼. - 蔚峒� 峒勏佄� 谓峥ξ� 峒∥坚繓谓, 峒瓜�蟺委伪, 峤� B委伪蟼 峒�谓伪尾喂峥次�, 纬苇位蠅蟿始 峒偽� 峤勏單晃课� 蟺蟻峤赶� 峤懳坚径蟼, (282) 峤ハ兿�蔚蟻 魏伪峤� 蟿峤肝� 螖伪委未伪位蠈谓 蠁伪蟽喂谓 慰峒� 峒�谓未蟻喂伪谓蟿慰蟺慰喂慰委, 谓峥ξ� 蔚峒� 纬蔚谓蠈渭蔚谓慰蟼 蟿慰喂伪峥ο勈� 峒愊佄澄�味慰喂蟿慰, 慰峒肺� 峒ξ�, 峒�蠁始 峤�谓 蟿慰峤斘轿课际� 峒斚兿囄滴�, 魏伪蟿伪纬苇位伪蟽蟿慰谓 峒偽� 蔚峒段轿蔽�. - 峒斚兿勎� 渭峤参� 蟿伪峥ο勎�, 峤� 危蠋魏蟻伪蟿蔚蟼, 慰峤曄勏壪�, 峤∠� 蟽峤� 位苇纬蔚喂蟼. 蔚峒聪壩肝� 渭苇谓蟿慰喂 峒斘诚壩澄� 蟿慰峤合� 蟺伪位伪喂慰蠉蟼 蟿蔚 魏伪峤� 蟺蟻慰蟿苇蟻慰蠀蟼 峒∥坚慷谓 蟺蟻慰蟿苇蟻慰蠀蟼 蟿蔚 魏伪峤� 渭峋段晃晃课� 峒愇澄合壩嘉刮�味蔚喂谓 峒� 蟿慰峤合� 谓峥ξ�, 蔚峤愇晃蔽参肯嵨嘉滴轿肯� 渭峤参� 蠁胃蠈谓慰谓 蟿峥段� 味蠋谓蟿蠅谓, 蠁慰尾慰蠉渭蔚谓慰蟼 未峤� 渭峥單轿刮� 蟿峥段� 蟿蔚蟿蔚位蔚蠀蟿畏魏蠈蟿蠅谓. - (282B) 魏伪位峥断� 纬蔚 蟽蠉, 峤� 峒瓜�蟺委伪, 峤�谓慰渭维味蠅谓 蟿蔚 魏伪峤� 未喂伪谓慰慰蠉渭蔚谓慰蟼, 峤∠� 峒愇嘉酷蕉 未慰魏蔚峥栂�. 蟽蠀渭渭伪蟻蟿蠀蟻峥喯兾蔽� 未苇 蟽慰喂 峒斚囅�, 峤呄勎� 峒�位畏胃峥� 位苇纬蔚喂蟼 魏伪峤� 蟿峥� 峤勎较勎� 峤懳坚慷谓 峒愊�喂未苇未蠅魏蔚谓 峒� 蟿苇蠂谓畏 蟺蟻峤赶� 蟿峤� 魏伪峤� 蟿峤� 未畏渭蠈蟽喂伪 蟺蟻维蟿蟿蔚喂谓 未蠉谓伪蟽胃伪喂 渭蔚蟿峤� 蟿峥段� 峒拔次�蠅谓. 螕慰蟻纬委伪蟼 蟿蔚 纬峤跋� 慰峤椣勎肯� 峤� 螞蔚慰谓蟿峥栁轿肯� 蟽慰蠁喂蟽蟿峤聪� 未蔚峥ο佄� 峒�蠁委魏蔚蟿慰 未畏渭慰蟽委峋� 慰峒次何课肝滴� 蟺蟻蔚蟽尾蔚蠉蠅谓, 峤∠� 峒蔽何蔽结浇蟿伪蟿慰蟼 峤⑽� 螞蔚慰谓蟿委谓蠅谓 蟿峤� 魏慰喂谓峤� 蟺蟻维蟿蟿蔚喂谓, 魏伪峤� 峒斘� 蟿蔚 蟿峥� 未萎渭峥� 峒斘次课疚滴� 峒勏佄瓜兿勎� 蔚峒跋�蔚峥栁� 魏伪峤� 峒拔次�峋� 峒愊�喂未蔚委尉蔚喂蟼 蟺慰喂慰蠉渭蔚谓慰蟼 魏伪峤� 蟽蠀谓峤嘉� (282C) 蟿慰峥栂� 谓苇慰喂蟼 蠂蟻萎渭伪蟿伪 蟺慰位位峤� 蔚峒跋佄澄�蟽伪蟿慰 魏伪峤� 峒斘晃蔽参滴� 峒愇� 蟿峥喯兾次� 蟿峥喯� 蟺蠈位蔚蠅蟼. 蔚峒� 未峤� 尾慰蠉位蔚喂, 峤� 峒∥嘉�蟿蔚蟻慰蟼 峒懴勎贬繓蟻慰蟼 螤蟻蠈未喂魏慰蟼 慰峤椣勎肯� 蟺慰位位维魏喂蟼 渭峤参� 魏伪峤� 峒勎晃晃肯勎� 未畏渭慰蟽委峋� 峒�蠁委魏蔚蟿慰, 峒�蟿峤跋� 蟿峤� 蟿蔚位蔚蠀蟿伪峥栁� 峒斘轿蔽诚囄肯� 峒�蠁喂魏蠈渭蔚谓慰蟼 未畏渭慰蟽委峋� 峒愇� 螝苇蠅 位苇纬蠅谓 蟿始 峒愇� 蟿峥� 尾慰蠀位峥� 蟺维谓蠀 蔚峤愇次课何�渭畏蟽蔚 魏伪峤� 峒拔次�峋� 峒愊�喂未蔚委尉蔚喂蟼 蟺慰喂慰蠉渭蔚谓慰蟼 魏伪峤� 蟿慰峥栂� 谓苇慰喂蟼 蟽蠀谓峥段� 蠂蟻萎渭伪蟿伪 峒斘晃蔽参� 胃伪蠀渭伪蟽蟿峤� 峤呄兾�. 蟿峥段� 未峤� 蟺伪位伪喂峥段� 峒愇何滴�谓蠅谓 慰峤愇次滇繓蟼 蟺蠋蟺慰蟿蔚 峒犖疚�蠅蟽蔚谓 峒�蟻纬蠉蟻喂慰谓 渭喂蟽胃峤肝� 蟺蟻维尉伪蟽胃伪喂 慰峤愇词� 峒愊�喂未蔚委尉蔚喂蟼 蟺慰喂萎蟽伪蟽胃伪喂 峒愇� 蟺伪谓蟿慰未伪蟺慰峥栂� 峒�谓胃蟻蠋蟺慰喂蟼 蟿峥喯� 峒懳毕呄勎酷喀 蟽慰蠁委伪蟼. (282D) 慰峤曄勏壪� 峒ο兾蔽� 蔚峤愇�胃蔚喂蟼 魏伪峤� 峒愇晃滴晃�胃蔚喂 伪峤愊勎酷胶蟼 峒�蟻纬蠉蟻喂慰谓 峤∠� 蟺慰位位慰峥� 峒勎疚刮课� 蔚峒次�. 蟿慰蠉蟿蠅谓 未始 峒懳何�蟿蔚蟻慰蟼 蟺位苇慰谓 峒�蟻纬蠉蟻喂慰谓 峒�蟺峤� 蟽慰蠁委伪蟼 蔚峒聪佄澄毕兿勎蔽� 峒� 峒勎晃晃肯� 未畏渭喂慰蠀蟻纬峤赶� 峒�蠁始 峒�蟼 蟿喂谓慰蟼 蟿苇蠂谓畏蟼. 魏伪峤� 峒斚勎� 蟺蟻蠈蟿蔚蟻慰蟼 蟿慰蠉蟿蠅谓 螤蟻蠅蟿伪纬蠈蟻伪蟼.

            29 峒�蟻纬蠉蟻喂慰谓 F: 峒�蟻纬蠀蟻委慰蠀 TW

 

            27. Philod. rhet. I p. 188.21: 蟿维蠂伪 纬峤跋� 峒怺蟺峤禲 蟿慰蠉蟿蠅谓 魏伪蟿峥喯佅囄肝蔽� [蟿喂蟼] 峒愊佄滇繓 蟿峤跋� 未喂伪蟿蟻喂尾维蟼, 峒跋僛蠂蠀魏]苇谓伪喂 未峤� 慰峤愇次滇蕉蟼 渭峤� 蟿蔚[位苇蠅蟼 峒�]谓伪喂蟽蠂蠀谓蟿峥段�.

            峒愊�峤� 蟿慰蠉蟿蠅谓 i. e. Periclis et Thucydidis aetate, quos antea nominaverat.

 

            28. Vita Antiphontis orationibus praemissa: 峒埼较勎瓜嗎慷谓 蠀峒贬礁蟼 渭峤参� 峒ξ� 危蠅蠁委位慰蠀, 蠁蠀位峥喯� 未峤� 螒峒拔蔽较勎�未慰蟼, 峥�伪渭谓慰蠉蟽喂慰蟼 蟿峤肝� 未峥單嘉课�, 魏伪蟿峤� 未峤� 蟿峤� 螤蔚蟻蟽喂魏峤� 纬蔚谓蠈渭蔚谓慰蟼 蟽蠀谓萎魏渭伪蟽蔚 螕慰蟻纬委峋� 蟿峥� 蟽慰蠁喂蟽蟿峥�, 魏伪峤� 未喂未伪蟽魏维位峥� 蟿峤� 蟺蟻峥断勎� 蠂蟻畏蟽维渭蔚谓慰蟼 蟿峥� 蟺伪蟿蟻峤� 未喂未维蟽魏慰谓蟿喂 纬蟻维渭渭伪蟿伪, 蟿峥喯� 峒∥晃刮何�伪蟼 蟺蟻慰尾伪喂谓慰蠉蟽畏蟼 蟿峤� 蟺蔚蟻峤� 蟿慰峤合� 位蠈纬慰蠀蟼 峒愇疚迪�蠈谓畏蟽蔚 蠁蠀蟽喂魏峥� 未蔚喂谓蠈蟿畏蟿喂, 蟿峤次� 峒愇� 蟿峥喯� 峒�蟽魏萎蟽蔚蠅蟼 渭蔚位苇蟿畏谓 蟺蟻慰蟽位伪尾蠋谓, 渭畏未蔚谓峤赶� 渭峤参� 峒�魏蟻慰伪蟽维渭蔚谓慰蟼, 峤呄勎� 渭畏未始 峒ξ� 蟺蠋 蟿喂蟼 蟿蠈蟿蔚 渭萎蟿蔚 位蠈纬蠅谓 渭萎蟿蔚 蟿蔚蠂谓峥段� 峥ノ废勎肯佄刮横慷谓 蟽蠀纬纬蟻伪蠁蔚蠉蟼, 渭萎蟿蔚 蟽慰蠁喂蟽蟿峤聪� 蟺蟻慰蔚蟽蟿畏魏峤枷� 未喂伪蟿蟻喂尾峥喯�. 蟿慰峥栂� 蟺蟻峤� 伪峤愊勎酷喀 未峤� 峒愇较勏呄囜郊谓 尾喂尾位委慰喂蟼 魏伪峤� 蟿慰峥栂� 蟿峥段� 蟺慰喂畏蟿峥段� 渭维位喂蟽蟿伪, 蔚峒跋� 蟿慰蟽慰峥ο勎课� 蟺蟻慰峥單晃肝� 未蔚喂谓蠈蟿畏蟿慰蟼, 峤ハ兿勎� 螡苇蟽蟿蠅蟻 峒愊�蔚魏伪位蔚峥栂勎� 未喂峤� 蟿峤次� 峒愇� 蟿峥� 位苇纬蔚喂谓 峒犖次课轿�谓.

            Traditio est minime neglegenda, qua usus est is, qui vitam Antiphontis in vitis 围 oratorum Plutarcheis composuit, item Sudae lexicon. [蟺蟻峤� 螝蠈蟻伪魏慰蟼 魏]伪[峤禲 峒埼较勎瓜嗎慷谓[蟿慰蟼] 魏伪峤� [蟺伪谓蟿峤竇蟼 峒乕蟺]位峥断� 蟿蔚蠂谓慰纬蟻维蠁[慰蠀] supplendum videtur apud Philodemum rhet. I p. 187.16 sq. eademque res agi apud eundem II p. 111, fr. XXI. Adde Schol. in Prol. in Hermogenem W VII 6 = P. S. p. 189.9: 峒勎晃晃课� 未峤� 位苇纬慰蠀蟽喂谓 峒埼较勎瓜嗎慷谓蟿伪 蟿慰峥ο勎课� 蟿峤肝� 峥ノ�蟿慰蟻伪 scil. 未喂魏伪谓喂魏峤肝� 位蠈纬慰谓 蔚峒跋佄肺何�谓伪喂 蟺蟻峥断勎课�. Cf. Philodemus l. supra l. et Pseudoplutarchi vit. X 慰r. 832 C.

 

            29. Isocr. Antid. 15.295: 蟺维谓蟿蠅谓 蟿峥段� 未蠀谓伪渭苇谓蠅谓 位苇纬蔚喂谓 峒� 蟺伪喂未蔚蠉蔚喂谓 峒� 蟺蠈位喂蟼 峒∥坚慷谓 未慰魏蔚峥� 纬蔚纬蔚谓峥喯兾肝蔽� 未喂未维蟽魏伪位慰蟼, 蔚峒拔合屜勏壪偮� 魏伪峤� 纬峤跋� 峒單肝晃� 渭苇纬喂蟽蟿伪 蟿喂胃蔚峥栂兾蔽� 伪峤愊勧酱谓 峤佅佱慷蟽喂 蟿慰峥栂� 蟿峤次� 未蠉谓伪渭喂谓 蟿伪蠉蟿畏谓 峒斚囄肯呄兾� 魏伪峤� 纬蠀渭谓维蟽喂伪 蟺位蔚峥栂兿勎� 魏伪峤� 蟺伪谓蟿慰未伪蟺峤较勎毕勎� 蟺伪蟻苇蠂慰蠀蟽伪谓 蟿慰峥栂� 峒�纬蠅谓委味蔚蟽胃伪喂 蟺蟻慰峥兿佄肺嘉�谓慰喂蟼 魏伪峤� 蟺蔚蟻峤� 蟿峤� 蟿慰喂伪峥ο勎� 纬蠀渭谓维味蔚蟽胃伪喂 尾慰蠀位慰渭苇谓慰喂蟼, 峒斚勎� 未峤� 蟿峤次� 峒愇枷�蔚喂蟻委伪谓, 峒ハ�蔚蟻 渭维位喂蟽蟿伪 蟺慰喂蔚峥� 未蠉谓伪蟽胃伪喂 位苇纬蔚喂谓, 峒愇轿肝�谓未蔚 蟺维谓蟿伪蟼 位伪渭尾维谓慰谓蟿伪蟼. 蟺蟻峤赶� 未峤� 蟿慰蠉蟿慰喂蟼 魏伪峤� 蟿峤次� 蟿峥喯� 蠁蠅谓峥喯� 魏慰喂谓蠈蟿畏蟿伪 魏伪峤� 渭蔚蟿蟻喂蠈蟿畏蟿伪 魏伪峤� 蟿峤次� 峒勎晃晃肺� 蔚峤愊勏佄毕�蔚位委伪谓 魏伪峤� 蠁喂位慰位慰纬委伪谓 慰峤� 渭喂魏蟻峤肝� 峒∥澄酷喀谓蟿伪喂 蟽蠀渭尾伪位苇蟽胃伪喂 渭苇蟻慰蟼 蟺蟻峤赶� 蟿峤次� 蟿峥段� 位蠈纬蠅谓 蟺伪喂未蔚委伪谓. 峤ハ兿勈� 慰峤愇� 峒�未委魏蠅蟼 峤懴�慰位伪渭尾维谓慰蠀蟽喂谓 峒呄�伪谓蟿伪蟼 蟿慰峤合� 位苇纬蔚喂谓 峤勎较勎毕� 未蔚喂谓慰峤合� 蟿峥喯� 蟺蠈位蔚蠅蟼 蔚峒段轿蔽� 渭伪胃畏蟿维蟼.

            5 蟿峤� 蟿慰喂伪峥ο勎�: 蟿伪峥ο勎� 螛 蟿峤跋� 蟿慰喂伪蠉蟿伪蟼 cett. ll.       9 蟽蠀渭尾维位位蔚蟽胃伪喂 螛

            Cf. Cic. Brut. 13 (49). De sophistis Athenas incolentibus lepide Aristoph. Av. 1694 sq.

 

            30. Isocr. Antid. 15.41: 峒�位位峤� 渭峤次� 魏峒�魏蔚峥栁轿� 蟺峋断兾� 蠁伪谓蔚蟻蠈谓 峒愊兿勎刮�, 峤呄勎� 蟺伪渭蟺位畏胃蔚峥栂� 蔚峒跋兾刮� 慰峒� 蟺伪蟻伪蟽魏蔚蠀维味慰谓蟿蔚蟼 蟿慰峤合� 位蠈纬慰蠀蟼 蟿慰峥栂� 峒愇� 蟿慰峥栂� 未喂魏伪蟽蟿畏蟻委慰喂蟼 峒�纬蠅谓喂味慰渭苇谓慰喂蟼. 蟿慰蠉蟿蠅谓 渭峤参� 蟿慰委谓蠀谓 蟿慰蟽慰蠉蟿蠅谓 峤勎较勏壩� 慰峤愇次滇蕉蟼 蟺蠋蟺慰蟿蔚 蠁伪谓萎蟽蔚蟿伪喂 渭伪胃畏蟿峥段� 峒犖疚瓜壩嘉�谓慰蟼.

            1 魏峒�魏蔚峥栁较� 纬蔚 螛              3 蟿慰峤合� 峒愇� 蟿. 未. 峒�纬蠅谓喂味慰渭苇谓慰蠀蟼 螕螖

 

            31. Isocr. 魏伪蟿峤� 蟿峥段� 蟽慰蠁喂蟽蟿峥段� 13.9 sq.: 慰峤� 渭蠈谓慰谓 未峤� 蟿慰蠉蟿慰喂蟼 峒�位位峤� 魏伪峤� 蟿慰峥栂� 蟿慰峤合� 蟺慰位喂蟿喂魏慰峤合� 位蠈纬慰蠀蟼 峤懴�喂蟽蠂谓慰蠀渭苇谓慰喂蟼 峒勎疚刮课� 峒愊�喂蟿喂渭峥喯兾蔽孤� 魏伪峤� 纬峤跋� 峒愇何滇繓谓慰喂 蟿峥喯� 渭峤参� 峒�位畏胃蔚委伪蟼 慰峤愇瘁讲谓 蠁蟻慰谓蟿委味慰蠀蟽喂谓, 峒∥澄酷喀谓蟿伪喂 未峤� 蟿慰峥ο勈� 蔚峒段轿蔽� 蟿峤次� 蟿苇蠂谓畏谓, 峒⑽� 峤∠� 蟺位蔚委蟽蟿慰蠀蟼 蟿峥� 渭喂魏蟻蠈蟿畏蟿喂 蟿峥段� 渭喂蟽胃峥段� 魏伪峤� 蟿峥� 渭蔚纬苇胃蔚喂 蟿峥段� 峒愊�伪纬纬蔚位渭维蟿蠅谓 蟺蟻慰蟽伪纬维纬蠅谓蟿伪喂 魏伪峤� 位伪尾蔚峥栁� 蟿喂 蟺伪蟻始 伪峤愊勧慷谓 未蠀谓畏胃峥断兾刮铰� 慰峤曄勏� 未始 峒�谓伪喂蟽胃萎蟿蠅蟼 伪峤愊勎课� 蟿蔚 未喂维魏蔚喂谓蟿伪喂 魏伪峤� 蟿慰峤合� 峒勎晃晃肯呄� 峒斚囄滴刮� 峤懴�蔚喂位萎蠁伪蟽喂谓, 峤ハ兿勎� 蠂蔚峥栂佄课� 纬蟻维蠁o谓蟿蔚蟼 蟿慰峤合� 位蠈纬慰蠀蟼 峒� 蟿峥段� 峒拔次瓜壪勧慷谓 蟿喂谓蔚蟼 伪峤愊勎肯兿囄滴次刮�味慰蠀蟽喂谓, 峤呂枷壪� 峤懴�喂蟽蠂谓慰峥ξ较勎蔽� 蟿慰喂慰蠉蟿慰蠀蟼 峥ノ�蟿慰蟻伪蟼 蟿慰峤合� 蟽蠀谓蠈谓蟿伪蟼 蟺慰喂萎蟽蔚喂谓 峤ハ兿勎� 渭畏未峤参� 蟿峥段� 峒愇较屛较勏壩� 峒愇� 蟿慰峥栂� 蟺蟻维纬渭伪蟽喂谓 蟺伪蟻伪位喂蟺蔚峥栁�. (10) 魏伪峤� 蟿伪蠉蟿畏蟼 蟿峥喯� 未蠀谓维渭蔚蠅蟼 慰峤愇瘁讲谓 慰峤斚勎� 蟿伪峥栂� 峒愇枷�蔚喂蟻委伪喂蟼 慰峤斚勎� 蟿峥� 蠁蠉蟽蔚喂 蟿峥� 蟿慰峥� 渭伪胃畏蟿慰峥� 渭蔚蟿伪未喂未蠈伪蟽喂谓, 峒�位位维 蠁伪蟽喂谓 峤佄嘉课�蠅蟼 蟿峤次� 蟿峥段� 位蠈纬蠅谓 峒愊�喂蟽蟿萎渭畏谓 峤ハ兿�蔚蟻 蟿峤次� 蟿峥段� 纬蟻伪渭渭维蟿蠅谓 蟺伪蟻伪未蠋蟽蔚喂谓, 峤∠� 渭峤参� 峒斚囄滴� 蟿慰蠉蟿蠅谓 峒懳何�蟿蔚蟻慰谓 慰峤愇� 峒愇疚迪勎�蟽伪谓蟿蔚蟼, 慰峒跋屛嘉滴轿课� 未峤� 未喂峤� 蟿峤跋� 峤懴�蔚蟻尾慰位峤跋� 蟿峥段� 峒愊�伪纬纬蔚位渭维蟿蠅谓 伪峤愊勎课� 蟿蔚 胃伪蠀渭伪蟽胃萎蟽蔚蟽胃伪喂 魏伪峤� 蟿峤次� 蟺伪委未蔚蠀蟽喂谓 蟿峤次� 蟿峥段� 位蠈纬蠅谓 蟺位蔚委慰谓慰蟼 峒�尉委伪谓 未蠈尉蔚喂谓 蔚峒段轿蔽�, 魏伪魏峥断� 蔚峒拔聪屜勎迪�, 峤呄勎� 渭蔚纬维位伪蟼 蟺慰喂慰峥ο兾� 蟿峤跋� 蟿苇蠂谓伪蟼 慰峤愊� 慰峒� 蟿慰位渭峥段较勎迪� 峒�位伪味慰谓蔚蠉蔚蟽胃伪喂 蟺蔚蟻峤� 伪峤愊勧慷谓, 峒�位位始 慰峒迪勎刮轿迪� 峒勎�, 峤呄兾课� 峒斘轿迪兿勎刮� 峒愇� 峒懳何�蟽蟿畏, 蟿慰峥ο勈� 峒愇疚迪呄佄滇繓谓 未蠀谓畏胃峥断兾刮�.

            4/5 蟿慰峥� 渭喂蟽胃慰峥� v. l.                   13 纬蟻伪渭渭维蟿蠅谓 : 蟺蟻伪纬渭维蟿蠅谓 螕 prima manu, quod probaverat Gercke, probat Suess (Susemihl, Rh. M. 55.577 sq.).

            Cf. ibid. 12 sq., et quae infra ad Isocratis 13.12 in fragmentorum eius sylloge adnotavimus. Tum Hippocrates 蟺蔚蟻峤� 蟿蠈蟺蠅谓 蟿峥段� 魏伪蟿始 峒勎轿赶佅壪�慰谓 41-45 (Pohlenz, G枚tt. Gel. Nachr. N. F. II 4 (1937) 98 sq.). Ad 峤懴�蠈蟽蠂蔚蟽喂谓 9 sq. vid. Plato Phaedr. 235 B. Aischines 2.38. Theophrastus Char. 17.8 (Usener, Kl. Schriften I 26).

 

            32. Xen. Mem. 1.2.31: 峒愇� 峤�谓 未峤� 魏伪峤� 峒愇嘉�蟽蔚喂 蟿峤肝� 危蠅魏蟻维蟿畏 峤� 螝蟻喂蟿委伪蟼, 峤ハ兿勎� 魏伪峤� 峤呄勎� 蟿峥段� 蟿蟻喂维魏慰谓蟿伪 峤⑽� 谓慰渭慰胃苇蟿畏蟼 渭蔚蟿峤� 围伪蟻喂魏位苇慰蠀蟼 峒愇澄�谓蔚蟿慰 峒�蟺蔚渭谓畏渭蠈谓蔚蠀蟽蔚谓 伪峤愊勧糠 魏伪峤� 峒愇� 蟿慰峥栂� 谓蠈渭慰喂蟼 峒斘诚佄毕埼� 位蠈纬蠅谓 蟿苇蠂谓畏谓 渭峤� 未喂未维蟽魏蔚喂谓.

            Cf. Sextus Emp. adv. math. II 20 sq. Philod. II p. 216.I 359 c慰l. LXX. Idem Plato sentit atque Critias consanguineus Leg. 围I 938, mortis oratoribus minans supplicium.

 

            33. Diog. Laert. 4.1.4 de Speusipp慰: 魏伪蟿伪位苇位慰喂蟺蔚 未峤� 蟺维渭蟺位蔚喂蟽蟿伪 峤懴�慰渭谓萎渭伪蟿伪 . . . 峒愇� 慰峒废� 魏伪峤� . . 螕蔚蠂谓峥段� 峒斘晃滴诚囄肯� 伪 .

            (1f. Wendland 35.2. De artium omnium obtrectatoribus loquitur iam Hippocrates (7) 蟺蔚蟻峤� 蟿蠂谓畏蟼 c. 1, de Protagora Plato Soph. 232D. Umbram rei habes apud eundem Rei publ. 495C sq., ipsius rhetoricae censura legitur Leg. 937E. Philod. rhet. I p. 79.23 Sudh. = Philod. Suppl. p. 40.2: 峒埼晃迪囄痆谓慰蠀] 纬峤跋� 峒愇� 蟿慰峥栂� [峒搬及蔚]蟻峤� 峒�纬蠅纬峥哰蟼 魏]伪蟿畏纬慰蟻慰峥ξ较勎肯� 蟿峥段� 峥ノ废勎肯佄刮横慷谓 蟽慰蠁喂蟽蟿峥段�, 峤呄勎� 蟺慰位位峤� 味畏蟿慰峥ο兾刮� 峒�蠂蟻萎蟽蟿蠅蟼, 谓 峒愊兿勎� 魏伪峤� 蟿峤� 蟺蔚蟻峤� 蟿峤次� 位苇尉喂谓 伪峤愊勧慷谓 蟺蟻伪纬渭维蟿蔚蠀渭伪 魏伪峤� 蟿峤� 蟺蔚蟻峤� 蟿峤次� [渭谓]萎渭畏谓, 魏伪峤� 峒愇� 慰峒废� 峒愊�喂味畏蟿慰峥ο兾刮晃�纬蔚喂谓, 峤嵨嘉穂蟻]慰[谓 峤怾蟺慰胃蔚尾畏魏苇谓[伪喂 蟿慰峥栂� 峒擼蟺蔚蟽喂谓 峤�谓 峒�蟻蠂峤� [峋禲蟽蟿蟻伪 峒ノ次废�蟻慰尾苇尾畏魏蔚始, 魏伪峤� 蟺蔚蟻峤� 蟿喂谓峥段� 峒勎晃幌壩� [蟺伪]蟻维 蟿蔚 蟿慰蠉[蟿蠅]喂 魏伪峤� 蟺[伪蟻始 X]峤愊佄瓜�委未峥�... . Sequentia admodum incerta, F uit inter rhetoricae obtrectatores etiam 峤� 螝蠀蟻畏谓伪峥栁肯� 胃蔚蠈未蠅蟻慰蟼 cognomine 峒勎肝滴肯� (Philod. l. 1. II p. 116 fr. IX). Agnon quis fuerit, qui 魏伪蟿畏纬慰蟻委伪谓 峥ノ废勎肯佄刮横繂蟼 scripsit (Quintil. inst. 2.17,15), ignoratur (Sauppe Dr. Att. II 344).

 

            34. Aristot. Eth. Nicom. 1164 a 27: 慰峒� 未峤� 蟺蟻慰位伪渭尾维谓慰谓蟿蔚蟼 蟿峤� 峒�蟻纬蠉蟻喂慰谓, 蔚峒断勎� 渭畏未峤参� 蟺慰喂慰峥ξ较勎迪� 峤�谓 峒斚單毕兾蔽� 未喂峤� 蟿峤跋� 峤懴�蔚蟻尾慰位峤跋� 蟿峥段� 峒愊�伪纬纬蔚位喂峥段�, 蔚峒拔合屜勏壪� 峒愇� 峒愇澄何晃�渭伪蟽喂 纬委谓慰谓蟿伪喂路 慰峤� 纬峤跋� 峒愊�喂蟿蔚位慰峥ο兾刮� 峒� 峤∥嘉课幌屛澄废兾蔽�. 蟿慰峥ο勎� 未始 峒聪兿壪� 蟺慰喂蔚峥栁� 慰峒� 蟽慰蠁喂蟽蟿伪峤� 峒�谓伪纬魏维味慰谓蟿伪喂 未喂峤� 蟿峤� 渭畏未苇谓伪 峒偽� 未慰峥ξ轿蔽� 峒�蟻纬蠉蟻喂慰谓 峤�谓 峒愊�委蟽蟿伪谓蟿伪喂. 慰峤椣勎课� 渭峤参� 慰峤栁�, 峤�谓 峒斘晃蔽参课� 蟿峤肝� 渭喂蟽胃蠈谓, 渭峤� 蟺慰喂慰峥ξ较勎迪� 蔚峒拔合屜勏壪� 峒愇� 峒愇澄何晃�渭伪蟽委谓 蔚峒跋兾刮�.

 

            35. Isocr Antid. 15.197: 蟿峤跋� 尾位伪蟽蠁畏渭委伪蟼 魏伪峤� 魏伪蟿畏纬慰蟻委伪蟼, 伪峒废� 蠂蟻峥段较勎蔽� 魏伪胃始 峒∥坚慷谓, 峒愇疚滴晃�纬尉慰渭蔚谓 蠄蔚蠀未蔚峥栂� 慰峤斚兾毕�. 蔚峒跋冡蕉 未峤� 未喂蟿蟿伪委 位苇纬慰蠀蟽喂 纬峤跋� 慰峒� 渭苇谓, 峤∠� 峒斚兿勎刮� 峒� 蟺蔚蟻峤� 蟿慰峤合� 蟽慰蠁喂蟽蟿峤跋� 未喂伪蟿蟻喂尾峤� 蠁位蠀伪蟻委伪 魏伪峤� 蠁蔚谓伪魏喂蟽渭蠈蟼路 慰峤愇次滴嘉�伪 纬峤跋� 蔚峤曄佄废勎蔽� 蟺伪喂未蔚委伪 蟿慰喂伪蠉蟿畏, 未喂始 峒�蟼 纬苇谓慰喂蟿蠈 蟿喂蟼 峒偽� 峒� 蟺蔚蟻峤� 蟿慰峤合� 位蠈纬慰蠀蟼 未蔚喂谓蠈蟿蔚蟻慰蟼 峒� 蔚 蟺蔚蟻峤� 蟿峤跋� 蟺蟻维尉蔚喂蟼 蠁蟻慰谓喂渭蠋蟿蔚蟻慰蟼, 峒�位位始 慰i 蟺蟻慰苇蠂慰谓蟿蔚蟼 峒愇� 蟿慰蠉蟿慰喂蟼 蟿峥� 蠁蠉蟽蔚喂 蟿峥段� 峒勎晃幌壩� 未喂伪蠁苇蟻慰蠀蟽喂谓. 慰峒� 未峤� 未蔚喂谓慰蟿苇蟻慰蠀蟼 渭峤参� 峤佄嘉课晃课澄酷喀蟽喂谓 蔚峒段轿蔽� 蟿慰峤合� 蟺蔚蟻峤� 蟿峤次� 渭蔚位苇蟿畏谓 蟿伪蠉蟿畏谓 峤勎较勎毕�, 慰峤� 渭峤次� 峒�位位峤� 未喂伪蠁胃蔚委  蟻蔚蟽胃伪喂 魏伪峤� 纬委纬谓蔚蟽胃伪喂 蠂蔚委蟻慰蠀蟼路 峒愊�蔚喂未峤拔� 纬峤跋� 位维尾蠅蟽喂 未蠉谓伪渭喂谓, 蟿慰峥栂� 峒�位位慰蟿蟻委慰喂蟼 峒愊�喂尾慰蠀位蔚蠉蔚喂谓. 15

            1 蟿峤跋� 魏伪蟿. 螛 2 伪峒废� 谓峥ξ� 蠂蟻峥段较勎蔽� 1螛螛 5 峒偽� om. 螕 ante 纬苇谓慰喂蟿慰 螛 Sophistarum cavillationem habes e.g. in Cynegetici, qui 围enophonti tribuitur, cap. 围III. Ipsa autem quae tractatur, quaestio trita est in posteriorum controversiis. Cf. Maximi Planudis 蔚峒跋� 未蔚峥段� 伪始 scholia W V 440, 25: 峤� 未苇 纬蔚 X蟺委魏慰蠀蟻慰蟼 峒愇� 蟿峥� 蟺蔚蟻峤� 峥ノ废勎肯佄刮横繂蟼 (fr, 55 Us.) 伪峤愇肝蔽次�蟽蟿蔚蟻慰谓, 慰峒拔嘉蔽�. 位苇纬蠅谓 蠁畏蟽峤段� 伪峤愊勧礁蟼 渭蠈谓慰蟼 蔚峤愊佄肺何�谓伪喂 蟿苇蠂谓畏谓 蟺慰位喂蟿喂魏峥段� 位蠈纬蠅谓, 蟿慰峤合� 未峤� 峒勎晃晃肯呄� 峒�蟺慰蟽魏慰蟻伪魏委味蠅谓 峥ノ�蟿慰蟻伪蟼 峒愇毕呄勧糠 蟺蠅蟼 渭蟿蠂蠈渭蔚谓伪 位苇纬蔚喂 蠁蠉蟽喂蟼 纬维蟻 峒愊兿勎刮� 峒� 魏伪蟿慰蟻  胃慰峥ο兾� 位蠈纬慰蠀蟼, 蟿苇蠂谓畏 未峤� 慰峤愇次滴嘉�伪, quas esse nugas equidem non putaverim.

 

            36. Philod. rhet. I p. 210.9: 峒斘� 未始 (sc. 位苇纬蠅) 峒愇篬蔚峥朷谓慰蠀蟼 [蟿慰峤合俔 蟽慰蠁喂蟽蟿峤跋� 渭畏未峤� 蟺慰位位慰蟽[蟿峤肝絔 峒愇疚迪呄佄�蟽魏蔚喂谓 蟿峥段� 峒愇轿次迪嘯慰]渭苇谓蠅谓 峒愇� 蟿慰峥栂� 蟺慰位蔚喂蟿[喂魏]慰峥栂�, 峤呄兾课� 峒愊�峤� 蟿伪峥栂� 蟿蔚蠂谓慰位慰纬委伪喂蟼. 蟺维位喂 未始 峒曄勎迪佄肯� 渭峤参� 蠁萎蟽蔚喂 魏伪峤� 蟿慰蠉蟼 渭蔚纬维位慰蠀蟼 蟽慰蠁喂蟽蟿峤跋� 峒愇� 蟿慰峥栂� 蟽慰[蠁]喂蟽蟿喂魏慰峥栂� 峒�未蠀谓伪蟿蔚[峥朷谓, 峤∠� 魏[伪峤禲 蟿峤跋� 峒斘何次滴次课嘉�谓伪蟼 峤懴�始 伪[峤愊�)峥段� 峒偽� 蟿苇蠂谓伪蟼 魏伪峤� 蟿峤� 蟺伪蟻伪蟺位萎蟽喂伪 未喂伪蟽伪蠁蔚峥栁�.

 

            37. Aristot. Rhet. 1.1 1354b16: 蠁伪谓蔚蟻峤肝� 峤呄勎� 蟿峤� 峒斘鞠� 蟿慰峥� 蟺蟻维纬渭伪蟿慰蟼 蟿蔚蠂谓慰位慰纬慰峥ο兾刮� 峤呄兾课� 蟿峒單晃晃� 未喂慰蟻委味慰蠀蟽喂谓, 慰峒肺课� 蟿委 未蔚峥� 蟿峤� 蟺蟻慰 慰委渭喂慰谓 峒� 蟿峤次� 未喂萎纬畏蟽喂谓 峒斚囄滴刮�, 魏伪峤� 蟿峥段� 峒勎晃幌壩� 峒曃何毕兿勎课� 渭慰蟻委蠅谓路 慰峤愇次�谓 纬峤跋� 峒愇� 伪峤愊勎酷繓蟼 峒勎晃籵 蟺蟻伪纬渭伪蟿蔚蠉慰谓蟿伪喂 蟺位峤次� 峤呄�蠅蟼 蟿峤肝� 魏蟻喂蟿峤次� 蟺慰喂蠈谓 蟿喂谓伪 蟺慰喂萎蟽蠅蟽喂谓, 蟺蔚蟻峤� 未峤� 蟿峥段� 峒愇较勎�蠂谓蠅谓 蟺委蟽蟿蔚蠅谓 慰峤愇瘁讲谓 未蔚喂魏谓蠉慰蠀蟽喂谓, 蟿慰峥ο勎� 未始 峒愊兿勧蕉谓 峤呂肝滴� 峒勎� 蟿喂蟼 纬苇谓慰喂蟿慰 峒愇轿赶呂嘉肺嘉毕勎刮合屜�. 未喂峤� 纬峤跋� 蟿慰峥ο勎�, 蟿峥喯� 伪峤愊勧繂蟼 慰峤斚兾废� 渭蔚胃蠈未慰蠀 蟺蔚蟻峤� 蟿峤� 未畏渭畏纬慰蟻喂魏峤� 魏伪峤� 未喂魏伪谓喂魏峤� 魏伪峤� 魏伪位位委慰谓慰蟼 魏伪峤� 蟺慰位喂蟿喂魏蠅蟿苇蟻伪蟼 蟿峥喯� 未畏渭畏纬慰蟻喂魏峥喯� 蟺蟻伪纬渭伪蟿蔚委伪蟼 慰峤斚兾废� 峒� 蟿峥喯� 蟺蔚蟻峤� 蟿峤� 蟽蠀谓伪位位维纬渭伪蟿伪, 蟺蔚蟻峤� 渭苇谓 峒愇何滴�谓畏蟼 慰峤愇瘁讲谓 位苇纬慰蠀蟽喂谓 蟺蔚蟻峤� 未峤� 蟿慰峥� 未喂魏维味蔚蟽胃伪喂 蟺维谓蟿蔚蟼 蟺蔚喂蟻峥段较勎蔽� 蟿蔚蠂谓慰位慰纬蔚峥栁�, 峤呄勎� 峒�蟿蟿蠈谓 峒愊兿勎� 蟺蟻峤� 峒斚佄澄肯� 蟿峤� 峒斘鞠� 蟿慰峥� 蟺蟻维纬渭伪蟿慰蟼 位苇纬蔚喂谓 峒愇� 蟿慰峥栂� 未畏渭畏纬慰蟻喂魏慰峥栂� 魏伪峤� 峒�蟿蟿蠈谓 峒愊兿勎� 魏伪魏慰峥ο佄澄课� 峒� 未畏渭畏纬慰蟻委伪 未喂魏慰位慰纬委伪蟼, 峤呄勎� 魏慰喂谓蠈蟿蔚蟻慰谓.

            12 峤呄勎�: 峒�位位峤� v. 1.

            Dictum quidem esse, sed non scriptum 蟺蔚蟻峤� 未畏渭畏纬慰蟻委伪蟼 Plato testatur (cf. A V 43). Aristot. rhet. 1356a19: 峤呄勎� 渭峤参� 慰峤栁� 蟿峤� 峒斘鞠� 蟿慰峥� 蟺蟻维纬渭伪蟿慰蟼 慰峒� 峒勎晃晃课� 蟿蔚蠂谓慰位慰纬慰峥ο兾� 魏伪峤� 未喂始 峤� 蟿喂 渭峋段晃晃课� 峒�蟺慰谓蔚谓蔚蠉魏伪蟽喂 蟺蟻峤赶� 蟿峤� 未喂魏慰位慰纬蔚峥栁�, 蠁伪谓蔚蟻蠈谓.

 

            38. Plut. Them. 2.4: 渭峋段晃晃课� 慰峤栁� 峒勎� 蟿喂蟼 蟺蟻慰蟽苇蠂慰喂 蟿慰峥栂� M谓畏蟽喂蠁委位慰蠀 蟿峤肝� 螛蔚渭喂蟽蟿慰魏位苇伪 蟿慰峥� 桅蟻蔚伪蟻蟻委慰蠀 味畏位蠅蟿峤次� 纬蔚谓苇蟽胃伪喂 位苇纬慰蠀蟽喂谓, 慰峤斚勎� 峥ノ�蟿慰蟻慰蟼 峤勎较勎肯� 慰峤曄勎� 蟿峥段� 蠁蠀蟽喂魏峥段� 魏位畏胃苇谓蟿蠅谓 蠁喂位慰 蟽蠈蠁蠅谓, 峒�位位峤� 蟿峤次� 魏伪位慰蠀渭苇谓畏谓 蟽慰蠁委伪谓, 慰峤栂兾蔽� 未峤� 未蔚喂谓蠈蟿畏蟿伪 蟺慰位喂蟿喂魏峤次� 魏伪峤� 未蟻伪蟽蟿萎蟻喂慰谓 蟽蠉谓蔚蟽喂谓, 峒愊�喂蟿萎未蔚蠀渭伪 蟺蔚蟺慰喂畏渭苇谓慰蠀 魏伪峤� 未喂伪蟽峥澄段课较勎肯� 峤ハ兿�蔚蟻 伪蟻蔚蟽喂谓 峒愇� 未喂伪未慰蠂峥喯� 峒�蟺峤� 危蠈位蠅谓慰蟼. 峒ノ� 慰峒� 渭蔚蟿峤� 蟿伪峥ο勎� 未喂魏伪谓喂 魏伪峥栂� 渭蔚委尉伪谓蟿蔚蟼 蟿苇蠂谓伪喂蟼 魏伪峤� 渭蔚蟿伪纬伪纬蠈谓蟿蔚蟼 峒�蟺峤� 蟿峥段� 蟺蟻维尉蔚蠅谓 蟿峤次� 峒勏兾何废兾刮� 峒愊�峤� 蟿慰蠉蟼 位蠈纬慰蠀蟼 蟽慰蠁喂蟽蟿伪峤� 蟺蟻慰蟽畏纬慰蟻蔚蠉胃畏蟽伪谓.

 

            39. Isocr. C. soph. 13.19: 位慰喂蟺慰峤� 未始 峒∥坚繓谓 蔚峒跋兾刮� 慰峒� 蟺蟻峤� 峒∥坚慷谓 纬蔚谓蠈渭蔚谓慰喂 魏伪峤� 蟿峤跋� 魏伪位慰蠀渭苇谓伪蟼 蟿苇蠂谓伪蟼 纬蟻维蠄伪喂 蟿慰位渭萎 蟽伪谓蟿蔚蟼, 慰峤撓� o峤愇� 峒�蠁蔚蟿苇慰谓 峒�谓蔚蟺喂蟿喂渭萎蟿慰蠀蟼路 慰峒迪勎刮轿迪� 峤愊�苇蟽蠂慰谓蟿慰 未喂魏维 味蔚蟽胃伪喂 未喂未维蟽魏蔚喂谓, 峒愇何晃滴疚�渭蔚谓慰喂 蟿峤� 未蠀蟽蠂蔚蟻苇蟽蟿伪蟿慰谓 蟿峥段� 峤�谓慰渭维蟿蠅谓, 峤� 蟿峥段� 蠁胃慰谓慰蠉谓蟿蠅谓 峒斚佄澄课� 峒ξ� 位苇纬蔚喂谓 峒�位位始 慰峤� 蟿峥段� 蟺蟻慰蔚蟽蟿峤枷勏壩� 蟿峥喯� 蟿慰喂伪蠉蟿畏蟼 蟺伪喂未蔚蠉蟽蔚伪蠅蟼, 魏伪峤� 蟿伪峥ο勎� 蟿慰峥� 蟺蟻维纬渭伪蟿慰蟼, 魏伪胃始 峤呄兾课� 峒愊兿勧蕉 未喂未伪魏蟿蠈谓, 慰峤愇瘁讲谓 渭峋段晃晃课� 蟺蟻峤赶� 蟿慰峤合� 未喂魏伪谓喂魏慰峤合� 位蠈纬慰蠀蟼 峒� 蟺蟻峤赶� 蟿慰峤合� 峒勎晃晃肯呄� 峒勏�伪谓蟿伪蟼 蠋蠁蔚位蔚峥栁� 未蠀谓伪渭苇谓慰蠀.

 

            40. Plato Leg. 937D-E: 魏伪峤� 未峤� 魏伪峤� 未委魏畏 峒愇� 峒�谓胃蟻蠋蟺慰喂蟼 蟺峥断� 慰峤� 魏伪位蠈谓, 峤� 蟺维谓蟿伪 峒∥嘉�蟻蠅魏蔚 蟿峤� 峒�谓胃蟻蠋蟺喂谓伪蟼 魏伪位慰峥� 未峤� 峤勎较勎肯� 蟿慰蠉蟿慰蠀 蟺峥断� 慰峤� 魏伪峤� 蟿峤� 尉蠀谓未喂魏蔚峥栁� 峒∥坚繓谓 纬委纬谓慰喂蟿始 峒偽� 魏伪位蠈谓蟼 蟿伪峥ο勎� 慰峤栁� 蟿慰喂伪峥ο勎� 峤勎较勎� 未喂伪尾维位位蔚喂 蟿喂蟼 魏维魏畏, 魏伪位峤肝� 峤勎轿课嘉� 蟺蟻慰蟽蟿畏蟽伪渭苇谓畏 蟿苇蠂谓畏谓, 峒� 蟺蟻峥断勎课� 渭峤参� 未萎 蠁畏蟽喂谓 蔚峒段轿蔽� 蟿喂谓伪 未喂魏峥段� 渭畏蠂伪谓萎谓, 蔚峒段轿蔽� 5 未始 伪峤愊勧酱谓 蟿峥� 蟿蔚 未喂魏维蟽伪蟽胃伪喂 魏伪峤� 尉蠀谓未喂魏蔚峥栁� 峒勎晃会砍 谓喂魏峋段� 未蠀谓伪渭苇谓畏谓, 峒勎� 蟿始 慰峤栁� 未委魏伪喂伪 峒勎� 蟿蔚 渭峤� 蟿峤� 蟺蔚蟻峤� 蟿峤次� 未委魏畏谓 峒懳何�蟽蟿畏谓 峋� 蟺蔚蟺蟻伪纬 渭苇谓伪路 未蠅蟻蔚峤拔� 未始 伪峤愊勧繂蟼 蔚峒段轿蔽� 蟿峥喯� 蟿苇蠂谓畏蟼 魏伪峤� 蟿峥段� 位蠈纬蠅谓 蟿峥段� 峒愇� 蟿峥喯� 蟿苇蠂谓畏蟼, 峒偽� 峒�谓蟿喂未蠅蟻峥喯勎蔽� 蟿喂蟼 蠂蟻萎渭伪蟿伪.

            5 蔚峒段轿蔽� 未始 伪峥ο勎� 蟿慰峥� 蟿蔚

           

            41. Arist. Rhet. 1.1 1354a11: 谓峥ξ� 渭峤参� 慰峤栁� 慰峒� 蟿峤跋� 蟿苇蠂谓伪蟼 蟿峥段� 位蠈纬蠅谓 蟽蠀谓蟿喂胃苇谓蟿蔚蟼 峤�位委纬慰谓 蟺蔚蟺慰喂萎魏伪蟽喂谓 伪峤愊勧繂蟼 (蟿苇蠂谓畏蟼) 渭蠈蟻喂慰谓. 伪峒� 纬峤跋� 蟺委蟽蟿蔚喂蟼 峒斘较勎迪囄较屛� 峒愊兿勎� 渭蠈谓慰谓, 蟿峤� 未始 峒勎晃晃� 蟺蟻慰蟽胃峥單何蔽�. 慰峒� 未峤� 蟺蔚蟻峤� 渭峤参� 峒愇轿赶呂嘉肺嘉�蟿蠅谓 慰峤愇瘁讲谓 位苇纬慰蠀蟽喂谓, 峤呄�蔚蟻 峒愊兿勧蕉 蟽峥段嘉� 蟿峥喯� 蟺委蟽 蟿蔚蠅蟼, 蟺蔚蟻峤� 未峤� 蟿峥秈谓 峒斘鞠� 蟿慰峥� 蟺蟻维纬渭伪蟿慰蟼 蟿峤� 蟺位蔚峥栂兿勎� 蟺蟻伪纬渭伪蟿蔚蠉慰谓蟿伪喂. 5 未喂伪尾慰位峤� 纬峤跋� 魏伪峤� 峒斘晃滴肯� 魏伪峤� 峤�蟻纬峤� 魏伪峤� 蟿峤� 蟿慰喂伪峥ο勎� 蟺维胃畏 蟿峥喯� 蠄蠀蠂峥喯� 慰峤� 蟺蔚蟻峤� 蟿慰峥� 蟺蟻维纬渭伪蟿蠈蟼 峒愊兿勎刮�, 峒�位位峤� 蟺蟻峤赶� 蟿峤肝� 未喂魏伪蟽蟿萎谓.

            2 蟺蔚蟺慰蟻委魏伪蟽喂谓 Bekker ex Marciano, Ac in mg. 伪蠉蟿峥喯俔 伪峤愊勎酷喀 ll. quidam 3 蟺蟻慰蟽胃萎魏畏 nonnulli l1

            Cf. 1356a15 慰峤� 纬峤跋� 峤佄嘉课�蠅蟼 峒�蟺慰未委未慰渭蔚谓 蟿峤跋� 魏蟻委蟽蔚喂蟼 位蠀蟺慰蠉渭蔚谓慰喂 魏伪峤� 蠂伪委蟻慰谓蟿蔚蟼 峒� 蠁喂位慰峥ξ较勎迪� 魏慰伪峤� 渭喂蟽慰峥ξ较勎迪偮� 蟺蟻峤赶� 峤� 魏伪峤� 渭蠈谓慰谓 蟺蔚喂蟻峋断兾肝蔽� 蠁伪渭蔚谓 魏蟻伪纬渭伪蟿蔚蠉蔚蟽胃伪喂 蟿慰峤合� 谓峥ξ� 蟿蔚蠂谓慰位慰纬慰峥ξ较勎毕�.

 

            42. Sopatros in Hermog. W V 7.15 postquam antiquorum technographorum usque ad Isocratem nomina enarravit: 魏伪峤� 蟺峋断兾蔽� 渭峤参� 伪峤椣勎蔽� 未畏渭伪纬蠅纬喂魏伪峤� 蟿苇蠂谓伪喂 蔚峒跋兾�谓, 慰峤愇次�谓 蟺蔚蟻峤� 蟽蟿维蟽蔚蠅谓 峒斚囄肯呄兾蔽� 魏蔚蠁维位伪喂慰谓 峒� 蟿慰蠉蟿蠅谓 蟿峥段� 谓峥ξ� 峒愊�喂蟿畏未蔚蠀慰渭苇谓蠅谓, 蟺喂胃伪谓蠈蟿畏蟿慰蟼 未苇 蟿喂谓慰蟼, 蟺峥断� 未蔚峥� 未峥單嘉课� 峤懴�伪纬伪纬苇蟽胃伪喂.

            Isocratis 13.19 locum supra laudatum posthac (26) idem profert. Cf. supra A V 22.

 

            43. Plato Phaedr. 261B: 渭维位喂蟽喂伪 渭苇谓 蟺蠅蟼 蟺蔚蟻峤� 未委魏伪蟼 位苇纬蔚蟿伪喂 魏伪峤� 纬蟻维蠁蔚蟿伪喂 蟿苇蠂谓峥�, 位苇纬蔚蟿伪喂 未峤� 魏伪峤� 蟺蔚蟻峤� 未畏渭畏纬慰蟻委伪蟼, 峒愊�峤� 蟺位苇慰谓 未峤� 慰峤愇� 峒�魏萎魏慰伪.

             Itaque non novit 蟽蠀纬纬蟻维渭渭慰伪蟿伪 蟺蔚蟻峤� 未畏渭畏纬慰蟻委伪蟼. 7. etiam Brandst盲tter p. 191 adn. 2.

 

            44. Plato Rei publ. 365D adulescentes secum reputantes facit: 峒�位位始 峤呂枷壪�, 蔚峒� 渭苇位位慰渭蔚谓 蔚峤愇次蔽刮嘉课轿�蟽蔚喂谓, 蟿伪蠉蟿畏 峒跋勎�慰谓, 峤∠� 蟿峤� 峒聪囄轿� 蟿峥段� 位蠈纬蠅谓 蠁苇蟻蔚喂. 峒愊�峤� 纬峤跋� 蟿峤� 位伪谓胃维谓蔚喂谓 蟽蠀谓蠅渭慰蟽委伪蟼 蟿蔚 魏伪峤� 峒懴勎蔽瓜佄滴�伪蟼 蟽蠀谓维尉慰渭蔚谓, 蔚峒断兾�谓 蟿蔚 蟺蔚喂胃慰峥ο� 未喂未维蟽魏伪位慰喂 蟽慰蠁委伪谓 未畏渭畏 纬慰蟻喂魏萎谓 蟿蔚 魏伪峤� 未喂魏伪谓喂魏峤次� 未喂未蠈谓蟿蔚蟼, 峒愇� 峤�谓 蟿峤� 渭峤参� 蟺蔚委蟽慰渭蔚谓, 蟿峤� 未峤� 尾喂伪蟽蠈渭蔚胃伪, 峤∠� 蟺位蔚慰谓蔚魏蟿慰峥ξ较勎迪� 未委魏畏谓 渭峤� 未喂未蠈谓伪喂.

            Cf. Gorg. 452E. Euthydem. 290A. Aristoteles Eth. Nicom. 1181a4 politicos spectans: 魏伪委蟿慰喂 魏维位位喂慰谓 峒ξ� 峒跋兿壪� (纬蟻维蠁蔚喂谓 蟺蔚蟻峤� 蟿峥段� 蟿慰喂慰蠉蟿蠅谓) 峒� 位蠈纬慰蠀蟼 未喂魏伪谓喂魏慰蠉蟼 蟿蔚 魏伪峤� 未畏渭畏纬慰蟻喂魏慰蠉蟼, Philod. rhet. I p. 132.7: 峒�位位峤� 蟿[峤次� 蟿苇蠂谓畏谓 位苇纬慰蠀蟽喂谓 蔚峒段轿蔽� 蟺蔚蟻峤� [蟿峤跋� 未畏渭]畏纬慰蟻委伪蟼 [魏伪峤� 蟿峤跋� 未]魏伪蟼. Platonem ipsum sex species rhetorices distinxisse tradit Diogenes Laert. 3.59 (93); sunt autem 蟺蟻慰蟿蟻慰蟺萎, 峒�蟺慰蟿蟻慰蟺萎, 魏伪蟿畏 纬慰蟻委伪, 峒�蟺慰位慰纬委伪, 峒愇澄合幬嘉刮课�, 蠄蠈纬慰蟼, quibus septimum 蟿峤� 峒愇疚迪勎毕兿勎刮合屛� addit Anaximenes, numeri septem amator, sed ne is quidem plura quam duo genera orationum publicarum agnoscit, iudiciale et contionale, itaque 蟿峤� 峒愊�喂未蔚喂魏蟿喂魏蠈谓 proprium genus ante Aristotelem fuisse non videtur.

 

            45. Isocr. Evag. 9.8: 慰峒段次� 渭峤参� 慰峤栁�, 峤呄勎� 蠂伪位蔚蟺蠈谓 峒愊兿勎刮�, 峤� 渭苇位位蠅 蟺慰喂蔚峥栁�, 峒�谓未蟻峤赶� 峒�蟻蔚蟿峤次� 未喂峤� 位蠈纬蠅谓 峒愇澄合壩嘉刮�味蔚喂谓. 蟽畏渭蔚峥栁课� 未峤� 渭苇纬喂蟽蟿慰谓路 蟺蔚蟻峤� 渭峤参� 纬峤跋� 峒勎晃幌壩� 蟺慰位位峥段� 魏伪峤� 蟺伪谓蟿慰未伪蟺峥段� 位苇纬蔚喂谓 蟿慰位渭峥断兾刮� 慰峒� 蟺蔚蟻峤� 蟿峤次� 蠁喂位慰蟽慰蠁委伪谓 峤勎较勎迪�, 蟺蔚蟻峤� 未峤� 蟿峥段� 蟿慰喂慰蠉蟿蠅谓 慰峤愇次滇繓蟼 蟺蠋蟺慰蟿始 伪峤愊勧慷谓 蟽蠀纬纬蟻维蠁蔚喂谓 峒愊�蔚蠂蔚委蟻畏蟽蔚谓.

 

            46. Aristot. Eth. Nic. 1101b64, postquam, quae sit inter laudem atque encomium diEerentia, exposuit: 峒�位位峤� 蟿伪峥ο勎� 渭峤参� 峒聪兿壪� 慰峒拔何滴瓜屜勎迪佄课� 峒愇疚蔽合佄刮参酷喀谓 蟿慰峥栂� 蟺蔚蟻峤� 蟿峤� 峒愇澄合幬嘉刮� 蟺蔚蟺慰谓畏渭苇谓慰喂蟼. Ipsum Isocratem eiusque discipulos videtur intellegere.

 

            47. Aristot. Rhet. 1403b35: 慰峤曄�蠅 未峤� 蟽蠉纬魏蔚喂蟿伪喂 蟿苇蠂谓畏 蟺蔚蟻峤� 伪峤愊勧慷谓 (sc. 蟿峥段� 蟺蔚蟻峤� 蟿峤次� 峤懴�蠈魏蟻喂蟽喂谓), 峒愊�蔚峤� 魏伪峤� 蟿峤� 蟺蔚蟻峤� 蟿峤次� 位苇尉喂谓 峤�蠄苇 蟺蟻慰峥單晃肝滴�.

 

            48. Aristot. Rhet. 1404a12: 峒愇何滴�谓畏 (i e. 峒� 位苇尉喂蟼) 渭峤参� 慰峤栁� 峤呄勎蔽� 峒斘晃肝�, 蟿伪峤愊勧礁 蟺慰喂萎蟽蔚喂 蟿峥� 峤懴�慰魏蟻喂蟿喂魏峥�. 峒愇澄何迪囄滴瓜佄�魏伪蟽喂谓 未苇 峒愊�始 峒�位委纬慰谓 蟺蔚蟻峤� 伪峤愊勧繂蟼 蔚峒跋�蔚峥栁� 蟿喂谓蔚蟼, 慰峒肺课� 螛蟻伪蟽蠉渭伪蠂慰蟼 峒愇� 蟿慰峥栂� 峒愇晃�慰喂蟼.

 

            49. Aristot. Rhet. 1403 h 20: 蟿蟻委蟿慰谓 未峤� 蟿慰蠉蟿蠅谓, 峤� 未蠉谓伪渭喂谓 渭峤参� 峒斚囄滴� 渭蔚纬委蟽蟿畏谓, 慰峤斚�蠅 未始 峒愊�喂魏蔚蠂蔚委蟻畏蟿伪喂, 蟿峤� 蟺蔚蟻峤� 蟿峤次� 峤懴�蠈魏蟻喂蟽喂谓.

            Cf. ibid. 31 sq.

 

            50. Rufin. Comm. de numeris oratoriis, Gramm. lat. VI 573, 22K. (Rhet. at. min. p. 581. 14H.: vi B VII 38.

 

            51. Longini rhet. p. 201. 24H.: 未畏 未峤� 魏伪峤� 危喂渭蠅谓委未畏蟼 魏伪峤� 蟺位蔚委慰蠀蟼 渭蔚蟿始 峒愇何滇繓谓慰谓 渭谓萎渭畏蟼 {纬谓蠋渭畏蟼} 峤佄次酷胶蟼 蟺蟻慰峤愇次�未伪尉伪谓, 蔚峒拔聪幬幌壩� 蟺伪蟻维胃蔚蟽喂谓 魏伪峤� 蟿蠈蟺蠅谓 蔚峒跋兾肺澄肯嵨嘉滴轿课� 蟺蟻峤赶� 蟿峤� 渭谓畏渭慰谓蔚蠉蔚喂谓 峒斚囄滴刮� (7) 峤�谓慰渭维蟿蠅谓 蟿蔚 魏伪峤� 峥ノ肺嘉�蟿蠅谓.

            Cf. Quint. Inst. 11.2.11 sq. Amm. Marc. 16.5.8, Dialexeis 9 et de Hippia Eleo infra, de Antiphonte 2.10.7. F. Solmsen, Die Entwicklung der aristot. Logik und Rhetorik (Neue philol. Unters. 4) 171 sq.

 

            52. Philod. Rhet. I p. 79.23 S. (Philod. Suppl p. M.2): 峒埼晃滴疚�谓慰蠀 纬峤跋� 峒愇� 蟿慰峥栂� 韦螤蔚蟻峤� 峒�纬蠅纬峥喯� 魏伪蟿畏纬慰蟻慰峥ξ较勎肯� 蟿峥段� 峥ノ废勎肯佄刮横慷谓 蟽慰蠁喂蟽蟿峥段�, 峤呄勎� 蟺慰位位峤� 味畏蟿慰峥ο兾刮� 峒�蠂蟻萎蟽蟿蠅蟼, 峤�谓 峒愊兿勎� 魏伪峤� 蟿峤� 蟺蔚蟻峤� 蟿峤次� 位苇尉喂谓 伪峤愊勧慷谓 蟺蟻伪纬渭维蟿蔚蠀渭伪 魏伪峤� 蟿峤� 蟺蔚蟻峤� 蟿峤次� 渭谓萎渭畏谓 (v. supra 36).

            Plato Leg. 811A: 慰峒� 未峤� 峒愇� 蟺维谓蟿蠅谓 (scil. 蟺慰喂畏蟿峥段�) 魏蔚蠁维位伪喂伪 峒愇何晃�尉伪谓蟿蔚蟼 魏伪委 蟿喂谓伪蟼 峤呂晃毕� 峥ノ�蟽蔚喂蟼 蔚峒跋� 蟿伪峤愊勧礁 蟽蠀谓伪纬伪纬蠈谓蟿蔚蟼 峒愇何嘉蔽轿肝�谓蔚喂谓 蠁伪蟽峤� 未蔚峥栁�, 蔚峒跋� 渭 谓 萎渭畏谓 蟿喂胃蔚渭 苇谓慰蠀蟼, 蔚峒� 渭苇位位蔚喂 蟿喂蟼 峒�纬伪胃峤赶� 峒∥坚繓谓 魏伪峤� 蟽慰蠁峤赶� 峒愇� 蟺慰位蠀 蟺蔚喂蟻委伪蟼 魏伪峤� 蟺慰位蠀渭伪胃委伪蟼 纬蔚谓苇蟽胃伪喂. Sophistas dici puto, nisi vero ipse Hippias intellegitur.